Skip to content
FonteumThe Graph
DataResearchCare CompareThe DifferAttestAPI
See the proof
  • Data
  • Research
  • Care Compare
  • The Differ
  • Attest
  • API
See the proof
  1. All studies
  2. /Who owns the medical industry: the Open Payments file nobody opens
FINANCIAL DISTRESS · ISSUE 083
cms-open-paymentsOriginal Research

Who owns the medical industry: the Open Payments file nobody opens

CMS's Open Payments ownership file lists 4,591 stakes that 3,965 physicians held in medical companies in 2024, worth $1.34 billion. The median stake is $19,440, but the top 1% of records hold 62.3% of the value: most are token interests in physician groups, and the dollars sit in a handful of device-company stakes.

BY FONTEUM RESEARCH BUREAU · JUNE 17, 2026 · 9 MIN READ · ASSERTED VIA SLSA L3REVIEWED BY DR. JENNIFER MONTECILLO, MDSNAPSHOT 2026-01-23 · DOI 10.5072/fonteum/open-payments-physician-ownership-concentration-2024 · LAST UPDATED JUNE 17, 2026
CMS Open Payments · 2026-01-23
Reviewed by Dr. Jennifer Montecillo, MD, non-practicing medical reviewer. Gullas College of Medicine, 2019. Non-practicing medical reviewer focused on source interpretation, terminology, and limitations language. About our reviewers →
Reproduce this study →
Physician ownership records by specialty, 2024cms-open-payments · 2026-01-23
Obstetrics & Gynecology
816
Gastroenterology
686
Urology
593
Orthopaedic Surgery
417
Ophthalmology
208
Neurological Surgery
163
Built on CMS Open Payments · snapshot 2026-01-23 · reproducible · re-derive the figures yourself
Key findings
62.3%
of the ownership file's $1.34 billion in reported value of interest sits in the top 1% of records — 46 of 4,591. The single largest record is 19.5% of the file and the top 10 are 43.5%; the bottom 90% of records hold 11.5%. Mean value ($291,057) is 15 times the median ($19,440)
cms-open-payments · CMS
$1.34B
in value of interest is reported across the 4,591 ownership records held by 3,965 physicians in 209 companies, against $147.8 million actually invested — a 9-to-1 ratio between what the stakes are worth and what was put into them in 2024. Snapshot published 2026-01-23
cms-open-payments · CMS
73.4%
of records — 3,371 — report a value of interest with zero dollars invested that year. These are standing equity stakes whose worth is disclosed, not fresh capital that changed hands; only a quarter of the file records a 2024 investment at all
cms-open-payments · CMS
85.9%
of ownership records belong to procedural and surgical specialties. Obstetrics & gynecology (17.8%), gastroenterology (14.9%), urology (12.9%) and orthopaedic surgery (9.1%) alone are 54.7% of the file by count — the specialties that buy implants, run ambulatory surgery centers, and back device startups
cms-open-payments · CMS
4,591
ownership and investment-interest records make up the program-year-2024 slice, across 3,965 physicians, 209 companies, and 50 states. Every figure here is a count or sum over published records — no individual physician is named, ranked, or scored
cms-open-payments · CMS
On this page
The file is a power lawWhat the stakes are worth, versus what went inTwo ownership files hiding in oneOwnership is a procedural-physician storyWhere the owners areWhat one row actually isMethodologyLimitationsSources

CMS's Open Payments program publishes three files each year. Two of them get nearly all the attention: the general-payments file, the source of every "pharma paid doctors X" headline, and the much larger research-payments file. The third is the ownership file — the disclosures that drug and device companies must file when a physician or an immediate family member holds an ownership or investment interest in them. It is the smallest of the three and the least read. For program year 2024 it holds 4,591 records, and opening it shows a market shaped almost nothing like the payment files beside it.

The file is a power law

The 2024 ownership file reports $1.34 billion in value of interest, but the median record is worth just $19,440 — because the top 1% of records hold 62.3% of the value. Concentration this steep is the defining fact of the file.

Slice of recordsShare of total value
Largest single record19.5%
Top 10 records43.5%
Top 1% (46 of 4,591 records)62.3%
Top 10% (459 records)88.5%
Bottom 90% (4,132 records)11.5%

Source: CMS Open Payments ownership file, value of interest ranked descending, program year 2024.

The mean value of interest is $291,057 — fifteen times the $19,440 median. That gap is the signature of a distribution with a short, heavy head and a very long thin tail: a few enormous stakes sitting above thousands of modest ones. The largest single record alone carries nearly a fifth of the file's entire reported value.

An ownership disclosure is a coverage record, not a verdict. It says a physician held a stake in a company that makes drugs or devices — and nothing about the quality, conduct, or standing of the physician who held it.

What the stakes are worth, versus what went in

The file reports $1.34 billion of value against $147.8 million actually invested — a nine-to-one ratio — and 73.4% of records record no investment at all in 2024. Open Payments keeps the two measures in separate columns, and the distinction matters for reading the file correctly.

Measure2024 ownership file
Value of interest (worth of the stakes)$1,336,244,024
Amount invested (dollars put in)$147,781,836
Value-to-invested ratio9.0x
Records reporting value but zero investment3,371 (73.4%)

Source: CMS Open Payments ownership file, value of interest and amount invested, program year 2024.

Value of interest is the reported worth of the ownership stake; amount invested is the capital the physician contributed during the year. Most records describe a holding that already exists and was simply re-disclosed: nearly three-quarters report a value with no new dollars invested in 2024. The file is therefore better read as a snapshot of standing equity than as a flow of fresh investment — the $1.34 billion is what the stakes are worth, not what changed hands.

Two ownership files hiding in one

Rank the companies by how many physicians own them and you get one list; rank them by how much that ownership is worth and you get an almost entirely different one. The file contains two structurally separate kinds of ownership.

Ranked by record countRecordsValue of interest
Unified Women's Healthcare, LP875$875
GastroGPO, LLC686$15,123,999
SN Holdings, LLC480$32,734,155
Ranked by value of interestRecordsShare of value
Midmark Corporation328.9%
TriMed, Inc.28.2%
Innovation Technologies Inc715.6%

Source: CMS Open Payments ownership file, top companies by record count and by value of interest, program year 2024.

The count leaders are physician-group and group-purchasing organizations: hundreds of physician-owners, each holding a small or token interest. One such entity has 875 records totalling $875 of value — about a dollar apiece. These records explain why obstetrics & gynecology and gastroenterology top the specialty counts, and why the median stake is so small.

The value leaders are device and biotech makers — orthopaedic, vascular, spine, and neuro-device companies in which a handful of physician-investors hold multimillion-dollar equity. Three records in a single medical-equipment maker carry 28.9% of the file's entire value. These records, not the long tail, are where the $1.34 billion lives. Across all 209 companies in the file, the top ten by record count hold 60.1% of the records, but value tracks a different, even tighter set.

Ownership is a procedural-physician story

Procedural and surgical specialties hold 85.9% of every ownership record in the file. Where the opt-out roster is a behavioral-health story and the research file is an institutional one, ownership belongs to the proceduralists.

SpecialtyOwnership recordsShare of file
Obstetrics & Gynecology81617.8%
Gastroenterology68614.9%
Urology59312.9%
Orthopaedic Surgery4179.1%
Ophthalmology2084.5%
Neurological Surgery1633.6%

Source: CMS Open Payments ownership file, ten-largest specialties shown as top six, by record count, program year 2024.

The pattern is structural. These are the specialties that implant devices, run ambulatory surgery centers and ambulatory-care joint ventures, and back the device and specialty-care startups whose products they use — so it is their stakes that the Sunshine Act picks up. Obstetrics & gynecology, gastroenterology, urology and orthopaedic surgery together are 54.7% of the file by count. Behavioral-health and primary-care specialties, which dominate other Medicare datasets, barely register here: they neither buy implants nor own the companies that make them.

Where the owners are

Texas holds the most ownership records of any state — 13.5% — while Florida carries the largest share of the value among the big states at 11.3%. Geography tracks where procedural medicine and physician-owned facilities concentrate.

StateRecordsShare of recordsShare of value
Texas61913.5%5.9%
Florida52511.4%11.3%
California3778.2%6.8%
Illinois2355.1%1.9%
New York2034.4%4.5%

Source: CMS Open Payments ownership file, states with the most records, program year 2024.

Texas and Florida — states with large physician-owned surgical and specialty markets and permissive self-referral environments — lead by record count, together holding a quarter of the file. The value share moves differently: Florida's records skew larger, while Illinois and several high-count states hold far less of the dollars than their record counts suggest, a reminder that counting owners and measuring ownership value give two different maps.

What one row actually is

Each row in the ownership slice of cms_open_payments is one disclosed interest: a physician's name and specialty, the company, the value of interest, the amount invested, and the terms. A physician can appear more than once — 3,965 distinct NPIs hold the 4,591 records — and two rows carry no NPI. The published file is the program-year-2024 release, the worth of stakes as companies reported them; counting and summing these rows is the whole method here. The NPI-to-entity-graph link is deferred, so ownership status renders on no individual provider profile. Every figure in this study is a count or sum at the file, specialty, company, or state level. No physician is named, ranked, or scored.

Methodology

All figures are direct aggregations over the cms_open_payments table filtered to record_type = 'ownership', populated from the OP_DTL_OWNRSHP file of CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act §6002), published annually at openpaymentsdata.cms.gov. The 2024 slice holds 4,591 ownership records across 121 specialty labels, 209 companies, and 50 states; 3,965 distinct NPIs; payment-publication date 2026-01-23; public, read-only; license US-Government-Works. CMS republishes Open Payments annually, so figures advance with each release.

This study reads the 2024 ownership file as a whole — every row is one disclosed physician or immediate-family interest in a reporting company. Two amount columns are reported separately and are not added together: value_of_interest_usd is the worth of the stake; total_amount_usd on ownership rows is the Total_Amount_Invested. The concentration figures rank records by value_of_interest_usd; the specialty group is records whose specialty matches a procedural or surgical field (surgery, orthopaedics, urology, gastroenterology, ophthalmology, cardiology, obstetrics, otolaryngology, dermatology, radiology, pain). Because these are counts and sums over a published file, every figure is exact as of the release rather than estimated. Value-of-interest figures are sensitive to a small number of very large records, and where the procedural and "other" groups diverge by value rather than count, the divergence is driven by those outliers — which is why the specialty finding is stated by record count. Methodology version: open-payments/v1. The source-provenance contract is documented in the provenance methodology.

Limitations

  • A disclosure record, not a quality or conduct signal. An ownership interest is a transparency disclosure required by statute. It is unrelated to exclusion, sanction, discipline, or any assessment of competence. This study draws no inference about any physician from the presence of a record.
  • Aggregate and group-level only. Every figure is a count or sum at the file, specialty, company, or state level. No individual physician is named, ranked, or scored, and the NPI-to-entity-graph link is deferred, so ownership renders on no provider profile.
  • Value of interest is not amount invested. The headline dollar figure is the reported worth of the stakes ($1.34 billion), not capital invested in 2024 ($147.8 million). The two columns measure different things and are reported separately; this study never sums them.
  • A few records dominate the dollars. Value of interest is heavily right-skewed: the top 1% of records hold 62.3% of the value. Sums and value shares are therefore sensitive to a handful of very large records, and the specialty story is reported by record count, which is robust to those outliers.
  • One program year, not a trend. Figures reflect the single 2024 release published 2026-01-23. CMS refreshes Open Payments annually and the ownership file's composition shifts between releases; this study does not model change over time.
  • Specialty and company labels are as reported. Specialty is the taxonomy label on the record and grouping follows those labels exactly; company names are as the reporting entity filed them. Records in adjacent specialties may sit just outside the procedural definition used here.

Sources

  • CMS — Open Payments (general, research, and ownership data) — the annual public-use files behind every figure in this study, including the OP_DTL_OWNRSHP ownership file.
  • CMS — Open Payments program — the Sunshine Act transparency program under which manufacturers disclose physician ownership and investment interests.
  • 42 CFR Part 403 Subpart I — Transparency Reports and Reporting of Physician Ownership or Investment Interests — the regulation that defines the ownership-disclosure requirement.

The companion dataset page for CMS Open Payments lists the full schema and refresh cadence, and the Open Payments data explorer exposes the underlying records. This is the ownership counterpart to the $8.5 billion research slice that dominates the same statute and to the 1% of physicians who collect two-thirds of general-payment money; for who pays see the device makers, not pharma, who top the manufacturer list and what industry money actually buys, and for the specialties and states the money touches, which specialties take the most and where industry payments land geographically.

Frequently asked questions

What is a physician ownership interest in Open Payments?
Under the Sunshine Act, when a physician or an immediate family member holds an ownership or investment interest in a company that makes drugs, devices, or biologicals, that company must disclose the interest to CMS each year. The disclosure records the value of the interest and how much the physician invested. It is one of three Open Payments files, alongside general payments and research payments, and is by far the smallest — 4,591 records for 2024 against millions of general-payment records.
How concentrated is physician ownership?
Extremely. The 2024 ownership file reports $1.34 billion of value of interest, but the median record is worth just $19,440. The single largest record accounts for 19.5% of all the value in the file, the top 10 records for 43.5%, and the top 1% of records — 46 of 4,591 — for 62.3%. The bottom 90% of records together hold 11.5%. It is a textbook power-law distribution.
What is the difference between value of interest and amount invested?
Value of interest is the reported worth of the ownership stake; amount invested is the dollars the physician actually put in during the year. They are reported in separate columns and the gap is large: $1.34 billion of value against $147.8 million invested, a 9-to-1 ratio. 73.4% of records report a value of interest with zero dollars invested that year — standing equity whose worth is disclosed, not new money changing hands.
Which specialties hold the most ownership interests?
Procedural and surgical specialties — 85.9% of all ownership records. Obstetrics & gynecology (17.8% of records), gastroenterology (14.9%), urology (12.9%), and orthopaedic surgery (9.1%) lead by count. These are the fields that use implantable devices, operate ambulatory surgery centers, and invest in device and specialty-care companies, which is why ownership concentrates there rather than in primary-care or behavioral specialties.
Does holding an ownership interest mean a physician did something wrong?
No. An ownership disclosure is a transparency record required by statute, not a disciplinary or quality signal. It records that a physician held a financial interest in a reporting company and is entirely separate from exclusion, sanction, or any assessment of conduct or competence. This study draws no inference about any physician from the presence of a record.
Why do some companies have hundreds of owners and others only a few?
Because the file contains two different kinds of ownership. Physician-group and group-purchasing entities show hundreds of physician-owners each holding a small or token interest — one such company has 875 records totalling $875 of value, about a dollar each. Device and biotech makers show the opposite: a handful of records holding multimillion-dollar equity. The first pattern drives the record counts; the second drives the dollars.
Can I reproduce these figures?
Yes. Every number is a direct count or sum over the public cms_open_payments table filtered to record_type = 'ownership', program year 2024, snapshot published 2026-01-23 — with no modeling. The exact SQL for the concentration curve, the value-versus-invested split, the two manufacturer rankings, and the specialty and state breakdowns is published in the reproducibility block below.

Who uses this data

The source data behind this study is public

Compliance teams, journalists, and researchers work from the same federal source families cited above — queried by NPI or facility identifier through Fonteum’s open dataset pages and API. Every figure traces to a frozen, downloadable snapshot you can reproduce yourself.

Browse CMS Open Payments→Query the API →How we built this →

Datasets used

CMS Open Payments→

Reproducibility

Every claim, reproducible

The SQL+
open-payments-physician-ownership-concentration-2024.sql
-- Physician OWNERSHIP and investment interest in the medical industry — the
-- untouched third slice of CMS Open Payments. Fully reproducible query.
--
-- Question: when a physician (or an immediate family member) holds an ownership
-- or investment interest in a company that makes drugs or devices, the Sunshine
-- Act requires that company to disclose it. What does the resulting ownership
-- file look like — how much value does it hold, who holds it, and how evenly is
-- it spread? The lead figure: the top 1% of records (46 of 4,591) hold 62.3% of
-- the file's $1.34 billion in reported value of interest; the median stake is
-- just $19,440. Ownership is a coverage/disclosure record, NOT a quality, fraud,
-- or wrongdoing signal of any kind.
--
-- Source:
--   public.cms_open_payments WHERE record_type = 'ownership' — the OP_DTL_OWNRSHP
--     disclosure file of CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act §6002), published
--     annually at openpaymentsdata.cms.gov. 4,591 ownership records for program
--     year 2024; payment_publication_date 2026-01-23. Public, read-only.
--     License: US-Government-Works (17 U.S.C. Sec. 105).
--     methodology_version = 'open-payments/v1'.
--
-- Universe: this study reads the ownership slice of program year 2024 AS A WHOLE
--   — every row is one disclosed physician/immediate-family ownership or
--   investment interest in a reporting company. value_of_interest_usd is the
--   reported worth of the interest; total_amount_usd on ownership rows is the
--   Total_Amount_Invested_USDollars (dollars the physician actually put in).
--   The two are different measures and are reported separately below.
--
-- Counting note: 3,965 distinct NPIs across 4,591 records (a physician can hold
--   interests in more than one company). 2 rows carry no NPI. No individual is
--   named, ranked, or scored in the study; every figure is an aggregate.

-- ============================================================================
-- (1) Universe reconciliation — the ownership file at a glance.
-- ============================================================================
SELECT
  count(*)                                                          AS records,
  count(DISTINCT recipient_npi)                                     AS distinct_npi,
  count(*) FILTER (WHERE recipient_npi IS NULL OR recipient_npi = '') AS null_npi,
  count(DISTINCT manufacturer_id)                                   AS companies,
  count(DISTINCT recipient_specialty)                              AS specialties,
  count(DISTINCT recipient_state)                                   AS states,
  round(sum(value_of_interest_usd)::numeric, 0)                     AS value_of_interest,
  round(sum(total_amount_usd)::numeric, 0)                          AS amount_invested,
  max(payment_publication_date)                                     AS published
FROM public.cms_open_payments
WHERE record_type = 'ownership';
--  records 4,591 · distinct_npi 3,965 · null_npi 2 · companies 209
--  specialties 121 · states 50 · value_of_interest 1,336,244,024
--  amount_invested 147,781,836 · published 2026-01-23

-- ============================================================================
-- (2) HEADLINE: concentration of value. The file is a power law — the largest
--     single record is 19.5% of all value, the top 10 records 43.5%, and the
--     top 1% of records (46) hold 62.3%. The bottom 90% hold 11.5%. Mean value
--     ($291,057) is 15x the median ($19,440): a short head, a very long tail.
-- ============================================================================
WITH r AS (
  SELECT value_of_interest_usd AS v,
    row_number() OVER (ORDER BY value_of_interest_usd DESC NULLS LAST) AS rn,
    sum(value_of_interest_usd) OVER ()                               AS total
  FROM public.cms_open_payments
  WHERE record_type = 'ownership'
)
SELECT
  round(100.0 * sum(v) FILTER (WHERE rn = 1)   / max(total), 1)      AS top1_record_pct,
  round(100.0 * sum(v) FILTER (WHERE rn <= 10) / max(total), 1)      AS top10_record_pct,
  round(100.0 * sum(v) FILTER (WHERE rn <= 46) / max(total), 1)      AS top1pct_pct,    -- 1% of 4,591
  round(100.0 * sum(v) FILTER (WHERE rn <= 459) / max(total), 1)     AS top10pct_pct,   -- 10% of 4,591
  round(percentile_cont(0.5) WITHIN GROUP (ORDER BY v)::numeric, 0)  AS median_value,
  round(avg(v)::numeric, 0)                                          AS mean_value
FROM r;
--  top1_record 19.5% · top10_record 43.5% · top1pct 62.3% · top10pct 88.5%
--  median_value 19,440 · mean_value 291,057   (bottom 90% of records = 11.5%)

-- ============================================================================
-- (3) Value of INTEREST vs amount INVESTED. The file reports $1.34B of value
--     against $147.8M actually invested — a 9.0x ratio — and 73.4% of records
--     (3,371) report a value of interest with ZERO dollars invested that year.
--     These are standing equity stakes whose worth is disclosed, not fresh
--     capital that changed hands in 2024.
-- ============================================================================
SELECT
  round(sum(value_of_interest_usd)::numeric, 0)                     AS value_of_interest,
  round(sum(total_amount_usd)::numeric, 0)                          AS amount_invested,
  round(sum(value_of_interest_usd)::numeric
        / nullif(sum(total_amount_usd), 0), 1)                      AS value_to_invest_ratio,
  count(*) FILTER (WHERE (total_amount_usd IS NULL OR total_amount_usd = 0)
                     AND value_of_interest_usd > 0)                 AS value_no_invest,
  round(100.0 * count(*) FILTER (WHERE (total_amount_usd IS NULL OR total_amount_usd = 0)
                     AND value_of_interest_usd > 0) / count(*), 1)  AS value_no_invest_pct
FROM public.cms_open_payments
WHERE record_type = 'ownership';
--  value_of_interest 1,336,244,024 · amount_invested 147,781,836 · ratio 9.0x
--  value_no_invest 3,371 · value_no_invest_pct 73.4%

-- ============================================================================
-- (4) TWO PATTERNS in one file. Ranked by RECORD COUNT the leaders are
--     physician-group / GPO entities where hundreds of physician-owners each
--     report a small or token interest; ranked by VALUE the leaders are
--     device and biotech makers where a few owners hold multimillion-dollar
--     equity. Unified Women's Healthcare: 875 records, $875 of value in total
--     (~$1 each). The two rankings barely overlap.
-- ============================================================================
-- By record count:
SELECT manufacturer_name,
  count(*)                                                          AS records,
  round(sum(value_of_interest_usd)::numeric, 0)                     AS value_of_interest
FROM public.cms_open_payments
WHERE record_type = 'ownership'
GROUP BY manufacturer_name
ORDER BY records DESC
LIMIT 6;
--  Unified Women's Healthcare, LP    875        875
--  GastroGPO, LLC                    686 15,123,999
--  SN Holdings, LLC                  480 32,734,155
--  US Retina LLC                     191 30,870,471
--  Cornerstone Specialty Network LLC 124    735,294
--  Spinal Simplicity, LLC            117 36,390,846

-- By value of interest (209 companies in the file; top 10 firms hold 60.1% of
--  records, the top firm holds 875 records / 19.1% of all records):
SELECT manufacturer_name,
  count(*)                                                          AS records,
  round(sum(value_of_interest_usd)::numeric, 0)                     AS value_of_interest,
  round(100.0 * sum(value_of_interest_usd)
        / sum(sum(value_of_interest_usd)) OVER (), 1)               AS pct_of_value
FROM public.cms_open_payments
WHERE record_type = 'ownership'
GROUP BY manufacturer_name
ORDER BY value_of_interest DESC
LIMIT 6;
--  Midmark Corporation            3 385,901,836 28.9%
--  TriMed, Inc.                   2 110,000,000  8.2%
--  Innovation Technologies Inc   71  75,247,808  5.6%
--  Imperative Care, Inc          21  39,887,900  3.0%
--  Scientia Vascular             32  39,081,890  2.9%
--  Spinal Simplicity, LLC       117  36,390,846  2.7%

-- ============================================================================
-- (5) Ownership is a procedural/surgical-physician story. 85.9% of records sit
--     with procedural and surgical specialties; obstetrics & gynecology,
--     gastroenterology, urology and orthopaedic surgery alone are 54.7% of the
--     file by record count.
-- ============================================================================
WITH g AS (
  SELECT
    CASE WHEN recipient_specialty ILIKE '%Surgery%' OR recipient_specialty ILIKE '%Orthopaedic%'
           OR recipient_specialty ILIKE '%Urology%' OR recipient_specialty ILIKE '%Gastroenterology%'
           OR recipient_specialty ILIKE '%Ophthalmology%' OR recipient_specialty ILIKE '%Cardiolog%'
           OR recipient_specialty ILIKE '%Cardiovascular%' OR recipient_specialty ILIKE '%Obstetrics%'
           OR recipient_specialty ILIKE '%Otolaryngology%' OR recipient_specialty ILIKE '%Dermatology%'
           OR recipient_specialty ILIKE '%Radiology%' OR recipient_specialty ILIKE '%Pain%'
         THEN 'procedural/surgical' ELSE 'other' END                AS grp,
    value_of_interest_usd                                           AS v
  FROM public.cms_open_payments
  WHERE record_type = 'ownership'
)
SELECT grp,
  count(*)                                                          AS records,
  round(100.0 * count(*) / sum(count(*)) OVER (), 1)                AS pct_records,
  round(100.0 * sum(v) / sum(sum(v)) OVER (), 1)                    AS pct_value
FROM g GROUP BY grp ORDER BY records DESC;
--  procedural/surgical 3,943 · 85.9% records · 56.3% value
--  other                 648 · 14.1% records · 43.7% value (value skewed by outlier records)

-- Top specialties by record count (the hero-chart bars):
SELECT recipient_specialty,
  count(*)                                                          AS records,
  round(100.0 * count(*) / sum(count(*)) OVER (), 1)                AS pct_records
FROM public.cms_open_payments
WHERE record_type = 'ownership'
GROUP BY recipient_specialty
ORDER BY records DESC
LIMIT 6;
--  Obstetrics & Gynecology              816  17.8%
--  Internal Medicine|Gastroenterology   686  14.9%
--  Urology                              593  12.9%
--  Orthopaedic Surgery                  417   9.1%
--  Ophthalmology                        208   4.5%
--  Neurological Surgery                 163   3.6%

-- ============================================================================
-- (6) WHERE the owners are — top states by record count, each with its own
--     share of the file's value. Texas leads by count (13.5%); Florida leads
--     among the large states by value (11.3%).
-- ============================================================================
SELECT
  recipient_state,
  count(*)                                                          AS records,
  round(100.0 * count(*) / sum(count(*)) OVER (), 1)                AS pct_records,
  round(100.0 * sum(value_of_interest_usd)
        / sum(sum(value_of_interest_usd)) OVER (), 1)               AS pct_value
FROM public.cms_open_payments
WHERE record_type = 'ownership' AND recipient_state IS NOT NULL
GROUP BY recipient_state
ORDER BY records DESC
LIMIT 8;
--  TX 619 13.5% val 5.9% · FL 525 11.4% val 11.3% · CA 377 8.2% val 6.8%
--  IL 235 5.1% val 1.9% · NC 220 4.8% val 0.9% · MD 207 4.5% val 1.1%
--  NJ 207 4.5% val 1.1% · NY 203 4.4% val 4.5%
The snapshot+
dataset_idcms-open-payments
snapshot_date2026-01-23
sha256
doi10.5072/fonteum/open-payments-physician-ownership-concentration-2024
slsa_provenance_url
The JOINs+
universe: record_type = 'ownership', program year 2024                              -- 4,591 records, 3,965 distinct NPIs, 209 companies, published 2026-01-23
value concentration = value_of_interest_usd ranked desc                              -- top 1% (46 rec) = 62.3%; top 10 rec = 43.5%; median $19,440 vs mean $291,057
value vs invested = sum(value_of_interest_usd) / sum(total_amount_usd)               -- $1.34B value / $147.8M invested = 9.0x; 3,371 rec (73.4%) value-but-zero-invested
two patterns: GROUP BY manufacturer_name ORDER BY count vs value                     -- count leader 875 rec/$875 total; value leader 3 rec/$385.9M (28.9%)
procedural group = specialty matching surgery/ortho/uro/GI/ophth/cards/OB/ENT/derm/rad/pain -- 3,943 rec = 85.9% of file by count
geography: GROUP BY recipient_state                                                  -- TX 13.5% by count; FL 11.3% by value; CA 8.2% by count
The pipeline version+
git_sha
slsa_provenance
methodology_versionopen-payments/v1

Reproduce this

Run the exact query against the frozen 2026-01-23.

-- Physician OWNERSHIP and investment interest in the medical industry — the -- untouched third slice of CMS Open Payments. Fully reproducible query. -- -- Question: when a physician (or an immediate family member) holds an ownership -- or investment interest in a company that makes drugs or devices, the Sunshine -- Act requires that company to disclose it. What does the resulting ownership -- file look like — how much value does it hold, who holds it, and how evenly is -- it spread? The lead figure: the top 1% of records (46 of 4,591) hold 62.3% of -- the file's $1.34 billion in reported value of interest; the median stake is -- just $19,440. Ownership is a coverage/disclosure record, NOT a quality, fraud, -- or wrongdoing signal of any kind. -- -- Source: -- public.cms_open_payments WHERE record_type = 'ownership' — the OP_DTL_OWNRSHP -- disclosure file of CMS Open Payments (Sunshine Act §6002), published -- annually at openpaymentsdata.cms.gov. 4,591 ownership records for program -- year 2024; payment_publication_date 2026-01-23. Public, read-only. -- License: US-Government-Works (17 U.S.C. Sec. 105). -- methodology_version = 'open-payments/v1'. -- -- Universe: this study reads the ownership slice of program year 2024 AS A WHOLE -- — every row is one disclosed physician/immediate-family ownership or -- investment interest in a reporting company. value_of_interest_usd is the -- reported worth of the interest; total_amount_usd on ownership rows is the -- Total_Amount_Invested_USDollars (dollars the physician actually put in). -- The two are different measures and are reported separately below. -- -- Counting note: 3,965 distinct NPIs across 4,591 records (a physician can hold -- interests in more than one company). 2 rows carry no NPI. No individual is -- named, ranked, or scored in the study; every figure is an aggregate. -- ============================================================================ -- (1) Universe reconciliation — the ownership file at a glance. -- ============================================================================ SELECT count(*) AS records, count(DISTINCT recipient_npi) AS distinct_npi, count(*) FILTER (WHERE recipient_npi IS NULL OR recipient_npi = '') AS null_npi, count(DISTINCT manufacturer_id) AS companies, count(DISTINCT recipient_specialty) AS specialties, count(DISTINCT recipient_state) AS states, round(sum(value_of_interest_usd)::numeric, 0) AS value_of_interest, round(sum(total_amount_usd)::numeric, 0) AS amount_invested, max(payment_publication_date) AS published FROM public.cms_open_payments WHERE record_type = 'ownership'; -- records 4,591 · distinct_npi 3,965 · null_npi 2 · companies 209 -- specialties 121 · states 50 · value_of_interest 1,336,244,024 -- amount_invested 147,781,836 · published 2026-01-23 -- ============================================================================ -- (2) HEADLINE: concentration of value. The file is a power law — the largest -- single record is 19.5% of all value, the top 10 records 43.5%, and the -- top 1% of records (46) hold 62.3%. The bottom 90% hold 11.5%. Mean value -- ($291,057) is 15x the median ($19,440): a short head, a very long tail. -- ============================================================================ WITH r AS ( SELECT value_of_interest_usd AS v, row_number() OVER (ORDER BY value_of_interest_usd DESC NULLS LAST) AS rn, sum(value_of_interest_usd) OVER () AS total FROM public.cms_open_payments WHERE record_type = 'ownership' ) SELECT round(100.0 * sum(v) FILTER (WHERE rn = 1) / max(total), 1) AS top1_record_pct, round(100.0 * sum(v) FILTER (WHERE rn <= 10) / max(total), 1) AS top10_record_pct, round(100.0 * sum(v) FILTER (WHERE rn <= 46) / max(total), 1) AS top1pct_pct, -- 1% of 4,591 round(100.0 * sum(v) FILTER (WHERE rn <= 459) / max(total), 1) AS top10pct_pct, -- 10% of 4,591 round(percentile_cont(0.5) WITHIN GROUP (ORDER BY v)::numeric, 0) AS median_value, round(avg(v)::numeric, 0) AS mean_value FROM r; -- top1_record 19.5% · top10_record 43.5% · top1pct 62.3% · top10pct 88.5% -- median_value 19,440 · mean_value 291,057 (bottom 90% of records = 11.5%) -- ============================================================================ -- (3) Value of INTEREST vs amount INVESTED. The file reports $1.34B of value -- against $147.8M actually invested — a 9.0x ratio — and 73.4% of records -- (3,371) report a value of interest with ZERO dollars invested that year. -- These are standing equity stakes whose worth is disclosed, not fresh -- capital that changed hands in 2024. -- ============================================================================ SELECT round(sum(value_of_interest_usd)::numeric, 0) AS value_of_interest, round(sum(total_amount_usd)::numeric, 0) AS amount_invested, round(sum(value_of_interest_usd)::numeric / nullif(sum(total_amount_usd), 0), 1) AS value_to_invest_ratio, count(*) FILTER (WHERE (total_amount_usd IS NULL OR total_amount_usd = 0) AND value_of_interest_usd > 0) AS value_no_invest, round(100.0 * count(*) FILTER (WHERE (total_amount_usd IS NULL OR total_amount_usd = 0) AND value_of_interest_usd > 0) / count(*), 1) AS value_no_invest_pct FROM public.cms_open_payments WHERE record_type = 'ownership'; -- value_of_interest 1,336,244,024 · amount_invested 147,781,836 · ratio 9.0x -- value_no_invest 3,371 · value_no_invest_pct 73.4% -- ============================================================================ -- (4) TWO PATTERNS in one file. Ranked by RECORD COUNT the leaders are -- physician-group / GPO entities where hundreds of physician-owners each -- report a small or token interest; ranked by VALUE the leaders are -- device and biotech makers where a few owners hold multimillion-dollar -- equity. Unified Women's Healthcare: 875 records, $875 of value in total -- (~$1 each). The two rankings barely overlap. -- ============================================================================ -- By record count: SELECT manufacturer_name, count(*) AS records, round(sum(value_of_interest_usd)::numeric, 0) AS value_of_interest FROM public.cms_open_payments WHERE record_type = 'ownership' GROUP BY manufacturer_name ORDER BY records DESC LIMIT 6; -- Unified Women's Healthcare, LP 875 875 -- GastroGPO, LLC 686 15,123,999 -- SN Holdings, LLC 480 32,734,155 -- US Retina LLC 191 30,870,471 -- Cornerstone Specialty Network LLC 124 735,294 -- Spinal Simplicity, LLC 117 36,390,846 -- By value of interest (209 companies in the file; top 10 firms hold 60.1% of -- records, the top firm holds 875 records / 19.1% of all records): SELECT manufacturer_name, count(*) AS records, round(sum(value_of_interest_usd)::numeric, 0) AS value_of_interest, round(100.0 * sum(value_of_interest_usd) / sum(sum(value_of_interest_usd)) OVER (), 1) AS pct_of_value FROM public.cms_open_payments WHERE record_type = 'ownership' GROUP BY manufacturer_name ORDER BY value_of_interest DESC LIMIT 6; -- Midmark Corporation 3 385,901,836 28.9% -- TriMed, Inc. 2 110,000,000 8.2% -- Innovation Technologies Inc 71 75,247,808 5.6% -- Imperative Care, Inc 21 39,887,900 3.0% -- Scientia Vascular 32 39,081,890 2.9% -- Spinal Simplicity, LLC 117 36,390,846 2.7% -- ============================================================================ -- (5) Ownership is a procedural/surgical-physician story. 85.9% of records sit -- with procedural and surgical specialties; obstetrics & gynecology, -- gastroenterology, urology and orthopaedic surgery alone are 54.7% of the -- file by record count. -- ============================================================================ WITH g AS ( SELECT CASE WHEN recipient_specialty ILIKE '%Surgery%' OR recipient_specialty ILIKE '%Orthopaedic%' OR recipient_specialty ILIKE '%Urology%' OR recipient_specialty ILIKE '%Gastroenterology%' OR recipient_specialty ILIKE '%Ophthalmology%' OR recipient_specialty ILIKE '%Cardiolog%' OR recipient_specialty ILIKE '%Cardiovascular%' OR recipient_specialty ILIKE '%Obstetrics%' OR recipient_specialty ILIKE '%Otolaryngology%' OR recipient_specialty ILIKE '%Dermatology%' OR recipient_specialty ILIKE '%Radiology%' OR recipient_specialty ILIKE '%Pain%' THEN 'procedural/surgical' ELSE 'other' END AS grp, value_of_interest_usd AS v FROM public.cms_open_payments WHERE record_type = 'ownership' ) SELECT grp, count(*) AS records, round(100.0 * count(*) / sum(count(*)) OVER (), 1) AS pct_records, round(100.0 * sum(v) / sum(sum(v)) OVER (), 1) AS pct_value FROM g GROUP BY grp ORDER BY records DESC; -- procedural/surgical 3,943 · 85.9% records · 56.3% value -- other 648 · 14.1% records · 43.7% value (value skewed by outlier records) -- Top specialties by record count (the hero-chart bars): SELECT recipient_specialty, count(*) AS records, round(100.0 * count(*) / sum(count(*)) OVER (), 1) AS pct_records FROM public.cms_open_payments WHERE record_type = 'ownership' GROUP BY recipient_specialty ORDER BY records DESC LIMIT 6; -- Obstetrics & Gynecology 816 17.8% -- Internal Medicine|Gastroenterology 686 14.9% -- Urology 593 12.9% -- Orthopaedic Surgery 417 9.1% -- Ophthalmology 208 4.5% -- Neurological Surgery 163 3.6% -- ============================================================================ -- (6) WHERE the owners are — top states by record count, each with its own -- share of the file's value. Texas leads by count (13.5%); Florida leads -- among the large states by value (11.3%). -- ============================================================================ SELECT recipient_state, count(*) AS records, round(100.0 * count(*) / sum(count(*)) OVER (), 1) AS pct_records, round(100.0 * sum(value_of_interest_usd) / sum(sum(value_of_interest_usd)) OVER (), 1) AS pct_value FROM public.cms_open_payments WHERE record_type = 'ownership' AND recipient_state IS NOT NULL GROUP BY recipient_state ORDER BY records DESC LIMIT 8; -- TX 619 13.5% val 5.9% · FL 525 11.4% val 11.3% · CA 377 8.2% val 6.8% -- IL 235 5.1% val 1.9% · NC 220 4.8% val 0.9% · MD 207 4.5% val 1.1% -- NJ 207 4.5% val 1.1% · NY 203 4.4% val 4.5%

Cite this study

Citation-ready for researchers and AI.

Fonteum Research Bureau (2026). Who owns the medical industry: the Open Payments file nobody opens. CMS Open Payments, snapshot 2026-01-23. https://fonteum.com/research/open-payments-physician-ownership-concentration-2024

Check the chain

Each figure is snapshot-attested — re-derive the hash from the federal file.

1
Snapshot
cms-open-payments · 2026-01-23
2
Field hash
SHA-256 a3f1c9…7e6b
3
Signed
Ed25519 · verifiable
✓ Chain signed · check it in Attest →

Related studies

  • FINANCIAL DISTRESS · JUN 2026The $8.5 billion nobody counts: research is most of industry's moneyEvery Open Payments study reads the same $3.31 billion general slice. But the largest kind of industry payment is research: $8.49 billion in 2024, 71% of all industry money on just 4.7% of records. And 98.9% of it goes to institutions, not individual physicians — paid out by a field one-third as broad.
  • FINANCIAL DISTRESS · JUN 2026The 1% of doctors who get two-thirds of industry moneyIn 2024 the top 1% of physicians — 9,792 of the 979,136 who received any industry money — captured 66% of every general-payment dollar tied to a recipient, $1.74 billion of $2.64 billion. The bottom half split 1.2%. Measured across recipients, the Gini coefficient is 0.927, far above the ~0.41 of US household income.
  • FINANCIAL DISTRESS · JUN 2026Which companies pay U.S. doctors the most? Device makers, not pharmaIn 2024, drug and device companies disclosed $3.31 billion in general payments to U.S. physicians under the Sunshine Act — and the largest payers are device makers, not pharma. BioNTech led at $180.6 million from just 164 royalty payments; the top 25 of 1,763 reporting companies account for 52% of every general-payment dollar.
  • FINANCIAL DISTRESS · JUN 2026Which medical specialties take the most industry money?In 2024, U.S. orthopedic surgeons received $381.4 million in general industry payments — more than any other specialty and over three times the second-place field. Counting spine, joint and sports-medicine subspecialties, orthopedics drew $531.8 million, about 16% of the $3.31 billion total. The average orthopedic payment was $1,711; the average internal-medicine payment was $96.
  • FINANCIAL DISTRESS · JUN 2026Industry payments to physicians by state: where the money landsIndustry's $3.31 billion in 2024 general payments to physicians spread across 59 U.S. jurisdictions, but not in proportion to population. California led at $334.5 million, yet Pennsylvania ranked third and Massachusetts fourth on far fewer payments — Massachusetts averaged $1,031 per payment against Texas's $153. Where royalty recipients live, not where patients are, shapes the map.

Federal source citations

  1. [1]CMS Open Payments · snapshot 2026-01-23 · federal source family · US-Government-Works
Dataset catalog →Source registry →Methodology →Chain integrity →All research →Provider lookup →

Fonteum Research · June 17, 2026 · All figures trace to the frozen federal-data snapshot cited above.

The substrate, by the numbers

44federal source familiesDistinct CMS, OIG, HRSA, FDA and peer datasets
35dataset pagesCitable, downloadable /data catalog pages
61reproducible studiesEach shipping the SQL behind its figures

Built on the authoritative federal record

The primary sources, named on every page.

These are the federal agencies whose public datasets Fonteum ingests and attributes — the issuing authorities, not customers or partners. Every figure on the site links back to one of them.

  • CMS
  • HHS-OIG
  • HRSA
  • FDA
  • NLM
  • NUCC
  • Census
  • BLS
  • BEA

See the full source registry, with license and refresh cadence for each →

Reproducible by design

Every figure traces to its federal source.

14-tuple provenance

Every rendered fact ties to a source URL, dataset ID, snapshot date, row key, and SHA-256 — the full chain-of-custody record.

Reproducible SQL

Each study ships the exact query behind its figures, run against the cited federal snapshot. Re-run it yourself.

Daily reconciliation

Published counts are reconciled against the upstream federal datasets on a daily cadence, with drift logged.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Two doors

Use the free API and open data

Query providers, facilities, sanctions, and quality scores — each field carrying its federal source. Self-serve, no call to start.

Explore the API →Browse the data catalog →

Talk to us

Managed pilots, enterprise terms, and audit-ready, signed attestation packages for compliance, risk, and research teams.

Talk to us →
Fonteum
Products
The DifferAttestAPIFHIR API
Data
Care CompareResearchData catalogSources
Company
Why FonteumAboutPressEditorial policyCorrections
Legal
Privacy policyTerms of serviceMedical disclaimer

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

© 2026 Fonteum LLC. All rights reserved.

The U.S. healthcare graph AI can cite — every fact carries its source.

Request access→