EDITORIAL REVIEW
Our reviewers
Fonteum publishes source-linked research and data pages over US federal healthcare datasets. Before a healthcare-facing page ships, a non-practicing medical reviewer reads it for one thing: that the terminology, the limitations language, and the way each federal source is described are accurate. The pages are data-led and informational — they report what a dataset says and where it came from, not clinical guidance.
Dr. Jennifer Montecillo, MD
Non-practicing medical reviewer · Gullas College of Medicine, 2019
Dr. Jennifer Montecillo earned her medical degree from Gullas College of Medicine in 2019. She is a non-practicing medical reviewer: she does not see patients, diagnose, treat, or give clinical advice, and nothing on Fonteum is a substitute for a clinician. Her role is editorial. She reviews how Fonteum describes the federal datasets behind a page — making sure a CMS measure is named the way CMS names it, that a limitation is stated plainly, and that nothing reads as a claim the source does not support.
Her review scope is the language layer, not the data pipeline: source interpretation, clinical and regulatory terminology, and the limitations blocks that tell a reader what a number can and cannot be used for. Available provenance fields — source, observation date, and methodology version — are populated separately by the data pipeline. Snapshot-attestation coverage is distinct.
Every reviewed page carries a last-reviewed date and a next-review date. The standing cadence is a re-review every six months, and a page is re-read out of cycle whenever the federal dataset behind it publishes a new release or its limitations language changes. The review covers wording and source description; it is not an audit of the underlying CMS, OIG, HRSA, or HHS data, which remains a US Government Work published by those agencies.