Skip to content
FonteumThe Graph
Fonteum · Sanctions · OIG LEIE

OIG LEIE research artifact — source and release date shown.

The static research artifact for OIG release 2026-05-08 contains 83,001 rows — 79,605 individuals and 3,396 entities. It classifies 43,005 rows as mandatory (1128a) and 39,747 as permissive (1128b). This artifact count is separate from Fonteum's production serving table:

68,055Source: OIG LEIE · As of 2026-05-08
rows when checked July 12, 2026. Neither count establishes current completeness; confirm a consequential record at the OIG public lookup.

What the data shows

Mandatory vs permissive

43,005 mandatory (1128a — program-related convictions, patient abuse, healthcare-fraud felonies) and 39,747 permissive (1128b — license actions, kickbacks, claims-based exclusions). Mandatory exclusions are 5-year minimum; permissive are case-by-case.

State concentration

Top 5 states by exclusion count: CA (9,655), FL (8,957), TX (5,866), NY (4,405), OH (3,759). In this dated artifact, CA + FL + TX together account for 29.5% of the rows.

Specialty mix

Top 5 specialties: NURSE/NURSES AIDE (34,493); OWNER/OPERATOR (3,181); PERSONAL CARE PROVID (3,143); HEALTH CARE AIDE (2,951); NO KNOWN AFFILIATION (2,131). NPI is captured on 8,551 records (10.3% of this artifact); entity records can lack an NPI.

YoY (most recent complete year): 2025 added 2,549 new exclusions (-585 vs prior year). The current calendar year is partial-data and is not used for trend reporting.

What the LEIE does not cover

Federal exclusion only. State Medicaid exclusion lists are separate registries with documented latency to the federal LEIE; 42 states maintain their own list. SAM.gov procurement debarment is a separate dataset with overlapping but non-identical scope. Reinstated parties are removed from the LEIE UPDATED.csv each month — historical reinstatement state is not retained in the source file. Fonteum surfaces these gaps explicitly in the methodology rather than papering over them.

Search the OIG exclusion list (LEIE) → · Excluded anywhere: federal + state Medicaid exclusions → · Cross-reference: Nursing Home Care Compare → · Audit-pack export integration → · Verify any record at OIG.hhs.gov →

Methodology · Sources · Corrections log · Editorial policy

What’s on file, by the numbers

Platform snapshot · 2026-07-22

13.4Mproviders & companiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities on file
26.2Msource-linked factsSource-linked field facts in the dated platform snapshot
90sources with dataDistinct snapshot source IDs with at least one positive record count
79fresh sourcesDistinct source IDs whose latest positive-data snapshot falls within the preceding 45 days
111sources integratedActive registry rows; integration does not establish a load
13state Medicaid jurisdictionsDistinct states represented in the state-exclusions serving table

Integrated, with-data, and fresh-observation counts are separate. No platform-wide source-completeness count is published. Completeness is source-specific and must be evaluated against the named source's expected scope. State coverage is a separate jurisdiction measure.

Source authority is record-specific

Use the issuer named on the record.

Fonteum spans federal, state, and global public publishers. A source page or returned record identifies its issuer and dataset where that metadata is available. A platform registry count does not assign every page to one authority or establish loaded, fresh, or complete coverage.

Browse source records and their stated limitations →

Reproducible by design

Inspect the evidence each published figure actually supplies.

Source and date

Research pages expose the named public file and observation date where those fields are available. Source-file SHA-256 coverage is separate; facts do not currently link deterministically to signatures.

Available derivation

Studies with a retained release and committed derivation link the SQL or method used. Other studies state the evidence and reproduction limits they actually have.

Daily observations

Dated table row-count observations can detect local drift. They do not imply that an upstream publisher released or Fonteum ingested new data that day.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Request access