How to screen for OIG, SAM & state exclusions
The statute-anchored guide: OIG's monthly recommendation, the lists, the cost of a miss, and an on-demand 25-NPI screen.
Open →Exclusion screening is checking a person or organization against the government lists of parties barred from federal programs — and keeping a dated record of the check. In healthcare, that means the OIG LEIE, SAM.gov, and each state's Medicaid exclusion list; in federal contracting, it means SAM.gov debarment and suspension. A party barred in one place can stay active in another — which is exactly the gap a single-list check misses.
Fonteum screens OIG LEIE, SAM.gov, and the currently loaded state Medicaid lists for GA, IA, MD, MS, MT, NC, ND, NH, NY, OH, PA, TN, and WA, returning an excluded-anywhere signal, and displays the source file and best available source-date field for supported matches — the record an audit asks for. This hub is where the healthcare and federal-contracting sides meet. Fonteum does not claim coverage of the other states. For source boundaries, read the definitions of OFAC, a sanctions list, and list-based sanctions.
Start a screen, or check a single party. The free workflow checks the first 25 NPIs against OIG LEIE, SAM.gov, and the supported state Medicaid lists currently loaded by Fonteum.
The statute-anchored guide: OIG's monthly recommendation, the lists, the cost of a miss, and an on-demand 25-NPI screen.
Open →The dual-buyer page: an API for developers and the deployed self-serve screening workflow for compliance teams.
Open →Check one provider against the federal healthcare exclusion list in a single query.
Open →The public OIG LEIE aggregate surface — free to browse and cite.
Open →Loaded OIG LEIE rows for parties excluded from federal healthcare programs under SSA §1128, with available provenance fields.
Open →The supported state lists currently loaded in one excluded-anywhere screen; the other states are not covered.
Open →The List of Excluded Individuals and Entities, defined.
Open →What an exclusion is and what it bars a provider from.
Open →Penalties, assessments, and repayment that can apply when federal programs are billed for items or services furnished by an excluded party.
Open →Original studies on who is barred, who stays active, and where the lists disagree — the citable evidence behind the screen.
How many excluded providers still appear as active in the national provider registry.
Open →Where an OIG exclusion and an active PECOS enrollment overlap.
Open →Parties on a state list that never appear on the federal LEIE.
Open →What the LEIE shows about exclusion type, basis, and trend over time.
Open →A full read of the federal healthcare exclusion population.
Open →Open Payments dollars flowing to parties already on the exclusion list.
Open →The same screening problem on the procurement side: who is debarred, and who got paid anyway. These /gov surfaces are the federal-contracting half of this hub.
The procurement vertical — SAM.gov exclusions and entity records with source and observation metadata where available.
Open →An answer-engine hub for debarment, suspension, and exclusion in procurement.
Open →Which agencies drive the active SAM exclusion population, by share.
Open →Procurement leakage: awards that landed while the party was barred.
Open →The procurement definition, and how it differs from a healthcare exclusion.
Open →The two federal-contracting bars and what each one means.
Open →Screen the first 25 unique ten-digit NPI inputs on demand across OIG LEIE, SAM.gov, and the supported state Medicaid lists currently loaded by Fonteum. The free result stays on screen; no artifact, email, or monitoring is created.
What’s on file, by the numbers
Platform snapshot · 2026-07-22
Integrated, with-data, and fresh-observation counts are separate. No platform-wide source-completeness count is published. Completeness is source-specific and must be evaluated against the named source's expected scope. State coverage is a separate jurisdiction measure.
Source authority is record-specific
Use the issuer named on the record.
Fonteum spans federal, state, and global public publishers. A source page or returned record identifies its issuer and dataset where that metadata is available. A platform registry count does not assign every page to one authority or establish loaded, fresh, or complete coverage.
Reproducible by design
Inspect the evidence each published figure actually supplies.
Source and date
Research pages expose the named public file and observation date where those fields are available. Source-file SHA-256 coverage is separate; facts do not currently link deterministically to signatures.
Available derivation
Studies with a retained release and committed derivation link the SQL or method used. Other studies state the evidence and reproduction limits they actually have.
Daily observations
Dated table row-count observations can detect local drift. They do not imply that an upstream publisher released or Fonteum ingested new data that day.
Named medical review
Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.