Provider data for AI / RAG
The path for AI teams grounding a model in citable federal provider data.
Open →Retrieval-augmented generation is only as trustworthy as the records it retrieves. Ground a model in federal provider data — identity, enrollment, quality, and exclusion status — and supported assertions can include available source metadata. Fonteum serves that data three ways an AI system can consume: an MCP server an agent calls directly, an API for retrieval, and bulk export for an index.
Responses can include dataset, source-agency, and snapshot metadata for a RAG answer to cite. The provenance schema is nullable and source-specific, so consumers should use only fields present in the response.
The interfaces an LLM, agent, or RAG pipeline can call. Same provider graph, same provenance, three shapes.
The path for AI teams grounding a model in citable federal provider data.
Open →What an autonomous agent can resolve, screen, and cite without a human in the loop.
Open →A Model Context Protocol server an agent calls directly — structured for LLM consumption.
Open →Query supported provider records and inspect the provenance fields supplied by the response.
Open →Provider resource types with source-specific provenance availability.
Open →Dataset-specific NDJSON and CSV exports where the source page publishes one.
Open →The provenance and integrity layer that lets a generated answer point back to a real federal record.
How ingest, reconcile, attest, and serve fit into one pipeline.
Open →Inspect retained versions after tracking began for the named sources that actually bank history.
Open →Stored snapshot-attestation metadata where a concrete snapshot id exists; not a signature on every answer.
Open →How records can be linked where participating sources publish a shared identifier.
Open →Where the data is quoted, and the citation guidance behind it.
Open →The skills declaration multi-agent frameworks parse for autonomous discovery.
Open →Published source pages show their available statistics, methods, and tables.
Open →The public source registry shows declared cadence and coverage for active sources.
Open →Reproducible, numeric studies an AI engine can quote with method and date.
Open →Let an agent screen a party against the exclusion lists and return a dated record.
Open →The HL7 standard behind the interop API.
Open →The health-data interoperability standards body.
Open →The structured public files an AI index ingests.
Open →The identifier a provider answer resolves on.
Open →Drop the MCP server into an agent or call the API, and ground provider answers in records that name their source when that metadata is available. Request access for higher limits and bulk export.
What’s on file, by the numbers
Platform snapshot · 2026-07-22
Integrated, with-data, and fresh-observation counts are separate. No platform-wide source-completeness count is published. Completeness is source-specific and must be evaluated against the named source's expected scope. State coverage is a separate jurisdiction measure.
Source authority is record-specific
Use the issuer named on the record.
Fonteum spans federal, state, and global public publishers. A source page or returned record identifies its issuer and dataset where that metadata is available. A platform registry count does not assign every page to one authority or establish loaded, fresh, or complete coverage.
Reproducible by design
Inspect the evidence each published figure actually supplies.
Source and date
Research pages expose the named public file and observation date where those fields are available. Source-file SHA-256 coverage is separate; facts do not currently link deterministically to signatures.
Available derivation
Studies with a retained release and committed derivation link the SQL or method used. Other studies state the evidence and reproduction limits they actually have.
Daily observations
Dated table row-count observations can detect local drift. They do not imply that an upstream publisher released or Fonteum ingested new data that day.
Named medical review
Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.