Skip to content
FonteumThe Graph

GUIDE · HEALTHCARE DATA FOR AI / RAG

Provider data an agent can cite, not hallucinate.

Ground a model or agent in U.S. healthcare provider data over an MCP server, FHIR R4, or bulk export — supported fields can include the federal source row they came from, so answers can point back to records you can re-check. This guide maps the AI on-ramps and the data behind them.

The short answer

How do you use healthcare provider data in AI and RAG?

Retrieval-augmented generation is only as trustworthy as the records it retrieves. Ground a model in federal provider data — identity, enrollment, quality, and exclusion status — and supported assertions can include available source metadata. Fonteum serves that data three ways an AI system can consume: an MCP server an agent calls directly, an API for retrieval, and bulk export for an index.

Responses can include dataset, source-agency, and snapshot metadata for a RAG answer to cite. The provenance schema is nullable and source-specific, so consumers should use only fields present in the response.

Common questions

Answers in one line each

Why ground a healthcare AI in federal data instead of scraping?
A model cannot explain where an answer came from unless its retrieval layer preserves source context. Supported Fonteum responses expose dataset, source-agency, or snapshot metadata when that surface has it, letting a RAG answer cite a re-checkable federal record without implying universal provenance or currentness.
Can an AI agent call Fonteum directly?
Yes. The MCP server lets an agent resolve a provider, screen against exclusion lists, and pull provenance without a human in the loop. The same data is published as machine-readable dataset declarations and an agent card so multi-agent frameworks can discover the skills autonomously.
Is the data free for AI search engines to cite?
Reads of published public-record pages carry no paywall, so AI search engines can retrieve and cite them. The numbers and tables render as visible HTML. Authentication raises rate limits and unlocks bulk export; stored attestation metadata applies only where a concrete snapshot relationship exists.
How does a model show an answer is current?
A response can report the source release or observation date when that metadata is present. Row-history replay is currently limited to named sources with banked versions—principally UK sanctions, small OFAC and UN slices, procurement awards, and a small set of superseded provenance claims—and is not available for every record.
START HERE

Add federal-data citations to your agent.

Drop the MCP server into an agent or call the API, and ground provider answers in records that name their source when that metadata is available. Request access for higher limits and bulk export.

What’s on file, by the numbers

Platform snapshot · 2026-07-22

13.4Mproviders & companiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities on file
26.2Msource-linked factsSource-linked field facts in the dated platform snapshot
90sources with dataDistinct snapshot source IDs with at least one positive record count
79fresh sourcesDistinct source IDs whose latest positive-data snapshot falls within the preceding 45 days
111sources integratedActive registry rows; integration does not establish a load
13state Medicaid jurisdictionsDistinct states represented in the state-exclusions serving table

Integrated, with-data, and fresh-observation counts are separate. No platform-wide source-completeness count is published. Completeness is source-specific and must be evaluated against the named source's expected scope. State coverage is a separate jurisdiction measure.

Source authority is record-specific

Use the issuer named on the record.

Fonteum spans federal, state, and global public publishers. A source page or returned record identifies its issuer and dataset where that metadata is available. A platform registry count does not assign every page to one authority or establish loaded, fresh, or complete coverage.

Browse source records and their stated limitations →

Reproducible by design

Inspect the evidence each published figure actually supplies.

Source and date

Research pages expose the named public file and observation date where those fields are available. Source-file SHA-256 coverage is separate; facts do not currently link deterministically to signatures.

Available derivation

Studies with a retained release and committed derivation link the SQL or method used. Other studies state the evidence and reproduction limits they actually have.

Daily observations

Dated table row-count observations can detect local drift. They do not imply that an upstream publisher released or Fonteum ingested new data that day.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Request access