Skip to content
FonteumPublic-records evidence

ABOUT

A public-records research bureau for the AI era

Fonteum publishes supported public records with available source and observation metadata across healthcare, federal procurement, sanctions and watchlists, federal enforcement, and global company registers. Active production registry status does not establish loaded, complete, or fresh coverage. As of August 18, 2026: 111 source-registry rows were integrated, 90 snapshot source IDs had data, and 70 had a positive-data observation within 45 days. Sources complete: not aggregated; No platform-wide source-completeness count is published. Completeness is source-specific and must be evaluated against the named source's expected scope. The 13 represented state Medicaid jurisdictions are a separate coverage measure.


When a model reasons about a hospital, a federal contractor, a sanctions party, or a regulated company, it usually does so over an opaque data lake it cannot cite. The result is an answer that sounds authoritative and is quietly wrong: a closed facility marked open, an exclusion that changed after award, a sanctions listing flattened into a name match, or an enforcement action detached from its issuing agency. Agents do not need another aggregator. They need a dated source trail.

Fonteum's active production registry spans healthcare providers, federal procurement, sanctions and watchlists, federal enforcement, and global company registers. Integrated, with-data, and fresh-observation counts are separate. No platform-wide complete-source count is published, and state coverage is a separate jurisdiction measure. Public fields expose available source and date metadata; coverage varies by source.

We do not sell secret access to public records. What we sell is the operating layer around them: a nullable fourteen-field provenance schema, published methodology, and stored snapshot attestation metadata where a concrete relationship exists. The fact ledger currently has no deterministic claim-to-signature link, and retained row history is source-specific rather than universal.


MEDICAL REVIEW

HOW WE WORK

Publish the method and limits

We publish methodology and available source dates. Reproduction depends on the named source release and whether its bytes or row history were retained.

Name the public authority

The registry spans supported federal, state, and global public-record sources. Each surface states its own scope and limitations; active registration is not a completeness claim.

Disclose integrity coverage

Source-file fingerprints appear where present, and separate snapshot-attestation records expose their own signature fields. Provenance facts do not currently link deterministically to those signatures.


LEADERSHIP

Jennifer Montecillo, MD

Co-Founder & Head of Research · press@fonteum.com

Jennifer Montecillo, MD, co-founded Fonteum and leads its research and medical-editorial work. A physician trained at Gullas College of Medicine, she moved from clinical training into healthcare-data research — the discipline of turning the government’s scattered, hard-to-trust health datasets into something a researcher, journalist, or clinician can actually rely on.

At Fonteum she owns the research standard: figures name the available public source and derivation, claims are framed as correlation rather than causation, and limitations are stated when a retained release or method cannot be re-run. Before a research study goes live, it passes her medical-editorial review.

Her work is built on a simple conviction: the most important health data in the country is already public, but it’s effectively unusable — buried across dozens of federal agencies in inconsistent formats. Making it accurate, sourced, and citable is what turns open data into something the public, the press, and AI systems can trust.

Founder & CEO — leadership inquiries: press@fonteum.com


PRESS & CONTACT

Press press@fonteum.com · Partnerships partners@fonteum.com · Pilot inquiries pilot@fonteum.com

Put the public record behind your agent.

What’s on file, by the numbers

Platform snapshot · 2026-08-18

13.4Mproviders & companiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities on file
26.2Msource-linked factsSource-linked field facts in the dated platform snapshot
90sources with dataDistinct snapshot source IDs with at least one positive record count
70fresh sourcesDistinct source IDs whose latest positive-data snapshot falls within the preceding 45 days
111sources integratedActive registry rows; integration does not establish a load
13state Medicaid jurisdictionsDistinct states represented in the state-exclusions serving table

Integrated, with-data, and fresh-observation counts are separate. No platform-wide source-completeness count is published. Completeness is source-specific and must be evaluated against the named source's expected scope. State coverage is a separate jurisdiction measure.

Source authority is record-specific

Use the issuer named on the record.

Fonteum spans federal, state, and global public publishers. A source page or returned record identifies its issuer and dataset where that metadata is available. A platform registry count does not assign every page to one authority or establish loaded, fresh, or complete coverage.

Browse source records and their stated limitations →

Reproducible by design

Inspect the evidence each published figure actually supplies.

Source and date

Research pages expose the named public file and observation date where those fields are available. Source-file SHA-256 coverage is separate; facts do not currently link deterministically to signatures.

Available derivation

Studies with a retained release and committed derivation link the SQL or method used. Other studies state the evidence and reproduction limits they actually have.

Daily observations

Dated table row-count observations can detect local drift. They do not imply that an upstream publisher released or Fonteum ingested new data that day.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Request access