Skip to content
FonteumThe Graph

By use case

Exclusion & monitoring (self-serve)Free roster screen — no accountExclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & provider-data enrichmentAudit evidence & defensible programsProvider data for AI / RAGM&A & network diligence

By buyer

Compliance & riskDevelopers & AI teams

By industry

HealthcareProviders & facilitiesFederal contractingSAM · USASpending · FAPIIS

The capability layer

APIREST + bulk accessMCP serverCallable by AI agentsFHIR R4 APIBulk exportAttestation & audit packReconciliationSource-vs-source diffsEntity graphSnapshotsPoint-in-time, bitemporal

The differentiator

Coverage & sourcesThe catalogFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareFacility qualityBrowse all datasets →
Research

The dev on-ramp

DocsAPI referenceMCP — connect your agentOne-paste installFHIR sandboxLive API surfaceQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrations
Pricing
Sign inFree roster screen →Get a signed certificate →

Solutions

Exclusion & monitoring (self-serve)Exclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & provider-data enrichmentAudit evidence & defensible programsProvider data for AI / RAGM&A & network diligenceCompliance & riskDevelopers & AI teamsHealthcareFederal contracting

Platform

APIMCP serverFHIR R4 APIBulk exportAttestation & audit packReconciliationEntity graphSnapshots

Data

Coverage & sourcesFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareBrowse all datasets →
Research

Developers

DocsAPI referenceMCP — connect your agentFHIR sandboxQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrations
Pricing
Sign inFree roster screen →Get a signed certificate →
Fonteum · Special Focus Facilities

CMS's shortlist of nursing homes flagged for repeat serious deficiencies — and the who slip back after graduating.

The Special Focus Facility (SFF) program is the most-actionable consumer-facing quality signal in the CMS nursing-home dataset — 85 active SFFs + 441 candidates in the 2026-05-07 snapshot, across 49 states. Facilities cycle through enrollment → graduation → and, per the OIG's October 2025 review,

64%Source: CMS Care Compare — Nursing Home Compare · As of 2026-05-01
relapse to substandard quality. CMS QSO-23-01-NH REVISED (January 2026) replaced staffing with falls prevalence as a selection criterion; CMS rejected the OIG ownership-disclosure recommendation.

See the Audit Pack →
Snapshot May 7, 2026·526 85 active SFFs + 441 candidates (snapshot 2026-05-07)·CMS Special Focus Facility Program List + OIG October 2025 SFF Report·Methodology →·Audit Pack →·Verify at CMS → ↗
CMS publishes the SFF list quarterly; source-modified 2026-04-01. OIG-25-00163 (October 2025) documents 64% post-graduation relapse to substandard quality. CMS rejected the OIG ownership-disclosure recommendation.
Active enrollment

Active Special Focus Facilities

Facilities currently under heightened CMS oversight for repeat serious deficiencies. CMS publishes the SFF list quarterly with rotation guidance and graduation criteria.

85
Pipeline

SFF Candidates

Facilities flagged for SFF program eligibility but not yet enrolled. CMS QSO-23-01-NH REVISED (January 2026) replaced staffing with falls prevalence as a candidate selection criterion.

441
Post-graduation relapse

Substandard-Quality Recurrence

OIG-25-00163 (October 2025):

64%Source: CMS Care Compare — Nursing Home Compare · As of 2026-05-01
of SFF graduates relapse to substandard quality. CMS rejected the OIG ownership-disclosure recommendation that would have tied SFF flag to ownership-percentage transparency.

64%
State coverage — top 10 by total flagged

47 states with active SFFs · 49 with candidates

State-level pages and per-facility profiles ship in follow-on state-pages waves.

StateActive SFFsCandidatesTotal flagged
TX63137
CA63036
OH52530
IL42024
PA42024
FL31518
MO31518
NY31518
IN21517
GA21012
Research — coming soon

SFF Relapse Analysis — Sprint 2 flagship study

Forthcoming flagship study mining the SFF graduation cohort + post-graduation deficiency citation history for the

64%Source: CMS Care Compare — Nursing Home Compare · As of 2026-05-01
relapse story plus the CMS-vs-OIG ownership-disclosure rejection. Source material drafted; publication queued for Sprint 2.

Compliance posture

Methodology · Corrections log · Editorial policy

Built on the authoritative federal record

The primary sources, named on every page.

These are the federal agencies whose public datasets Fonteum ingests and attributes — the issuing authorities, not customers or partners. Every figure on the site links back to one of them.

  • CMS
  • HHS-OIG
  • HRSA
  • FDA
  • NLM
  • NUCC
  • Census
  • BLS
  • BEA

See the full source registry, with license and refresh cadence for each →

Reproducible by design

Every figure traces to its federal source.

14-tuple provenance

Every rendered fact ties to a source URL, dataset ID, snapshot date, row key, and SHA-256 — the full chain-of-custody record.

Reproducible SQL

Each study ships the exact query behind its figures, run against the cited federal snapshot. Re-run it yourself.

Daily count checks

Published counts are checked against the upstream federal datasets on a daily cadence, with drift logged.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Two doors

Use the free API and open data

Query providers, facilities, sanctions, and quality scores — each field carrying its federal source. Self-serve, no call to start.

Explore the API →Browse the data catalog →

Talk to us

Managed pilots, enterprise terms, and audit-ready, signed attestation packages for compliance, risk, and research teams.

Talk to us →
Fonteum
Platform
Platform overviewAPIMCP serverFHIR R4 APIBulk exportAttestation & audit packReconciliationEntity graphSnapshots
Solutions
All solutionsExclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & enrichmentAudit evidenceProvider data for AI / RAGM&A & network diligenceCompliance & riskDevelopers & AI teams
Data & sources
Coverage & sourcesBrowse all datasetsState Medicaid exclusionsFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareSanctionsOwnershipStaffingDeficienciesSpecial Focus Facilities
Federal contracting
OverviewAwards during active exclusionFederal debarment scorecardProcurement questionsContractor lookup8(a) certification guide
Developers
Developer hubDocsAPI referenceQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrationsWebhooks
Research & guides
Research hubGuidesHealthcare provider dataExclusion & sanctions screeningProvider credentialing dataHealthcare data for AIHospital margin gapProvider access gapsGlossaryComparisonsCitationsWhy Fonteum
Company
AboutPressCustomersPricingContactEditorial policyCorrections
Trust & legal
TrustTrust markQualitySecurityPrivacy policyTerms of serviceAPI & MCP termsMedical disclaimer

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

© 2026 Fonteum LLC. All rights reserved.

·hello@fonteum.com

The U.S. healthcare graph AI can cite — every fact carries its source.

Every fact Fonteum serves carries a signed, re-checkable trust mark — source, as-of date, and an Ed25519 signature travel with the data. Re-check any fact at fonteum.com/verify · the trust-mark standard (W3C Verifiable Credentials 2.0, C2PA-aligned).
Request access→

The substrate, by the numbers

9.2Mgraph entitiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities
15.7Mlinked identifiersNPIs, CCNs, LEIs and more, resolved to entities
5Mgraph edgesSource-attested relationships between entities
44federal source familiesDistinct CMS, OIG, HRSA, FDA and peer datasets
35dataset pagesCitable, downloadable /data catalog pages
70reproducible studiesEach shipping the SQL behind its figures