Skip to content
FonteumThe Graph
Fonteum · Special Focus Facilities

Special Focus Facility List (2026): 85 active SFFs + 441 candidates

The Special Focus Facility (SFF) list is CMS's published roster of nursing homes flagged for repeat serious deficiencies and placed under heightened oversight. It currently holds 85 active SFFs + 441 candidates in the 2026-05-07 snapshot, across 49 states. Facilities cycle through enrollment → graduation → and, per the OIG's October 2025 review,

64%Source: CMS Care Compare — Nursing Home Compare · As of 2026-05-07
relapse to substandard quality. CMS QSO-23-01-NH REVISED (January 2026) replaced staffing with falls prevalence as a selection criterion; CMS rejected the OIG ownership-disclosure recommendation.

See the Audit Pack →
Active enrollment

Active Special Focus Facilities

Facilities currently under heightened CMS oversight for repeat serious deficiencies. CMS publishes the SFF list quarterly with rotation guidance and graduation criteria.

85
Pipeline

SFF Candidates

Facilities flagged for SFF program eligibility but not yet enrolled. CMS QSO-23-01-NH REVISED (January 2026) replaced staffing with falls prevalence as a candidate selection criterion.

441
Post-graduation relapse

Substandard-Quality Recurrence

OIG-25-00163 (October 2025):

64%Source: CMS Care Compare — Nursing Home Compare · As of 2026-05-07
of SFF graduates relapse to substandard quality. CMS rejected the OIG ownership-disclosure recommendation that would have tied SFF flag to ownership-percentage transparency.

64%
State coverage — top 10 by total flagged

47 states with active SFFs · 49 with candidates

State-level pages and per-facility profiles ship in follow-on state-pages waves.

StateActive SFFsCandidatesTotal flagged
TX63137
CA63036
OH52530
IL42024
PA42024
FL31518
MO31518
NY31518
IN21517
GA21012
Research — coming soon

SFF Relapse Analysis — Sprint 2 flagship study

Forthcoming flagship study mining the SFF graduation cohort + post-graduation deficiency citation history for the

64%Source: CMS Care Compare — Nursing Home Compare · As of 2026-05-07
relapse story plus the CMS-vs-OIG ownership-disclosure rejection. Source material drafted; publication queued for Sprint 2.

Methodology · Sources · Corrections log · Editorial policy

What’s on file, by the numbers

Platform snapshot · 2026-07-22

13.4Mproviders & companiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities on file
26.2Msource-linked factsSource-linked field facts in the dated platform snapshot
90sources with dataDistinct snapshot source IDs with at least one positive record count
79fresh sourcesDistinct source IDs whose latest positive-data snapshot falls within the preceding 45 days
111sources integratedActive registry rows; integration does not establish a load
13state Medicaid jurisdictionsDistinct states represented in the state-exclusions serving table

Integrated, with-data, and fresh-observation counts are separate. No platform-wide source-completeness count is published. Completeness is source-specific and must be evaluated against the named source's expected scope. State coverage is a separate jurisdiction measure.

Source authority is record-specific

Use the issuer named on the record.

Fonteum spans federal, state, and global public publishers. A source page or returned record identifies its issuer and dataset where that metadata is available. A platform registry count does not assign every page to one authority or establish loaded, fresh, or complete coverage.

Browse source records and their stated limitations →

Reproducible by design

Inspect the evidence each published figure actually supplies.

Source and date

Research pages expose the named public file and observation date where those fields are available. Source-file SHA-256 coverage is separate; facts do not currently link deterministically to signatures.

Available derivation

Studies with a retained release and committed derivation link the SQL or method used. Other studies state the evidence and reproduction limits they actually have.

Daily observations

Dated table row-count observations can detect local drift. They do not imply that an upstream publisher released or Fonteum ingested new data that day.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Request access