Skip to content
FonteumPublic-records evidence
Fonteum · Data · SNF All Owners
SNF-OWNERS
Dataset confidence

CMS SNF All Owners Nursing Home Ownership Data

Fonteum structures the CMS PECOS-derived SNF All Owners file — 280,207 ownership rows across 14,425 Medicare-certified skilled nursing facilities — for facility-level ownership analysis. The dataset documents the 82.4% ownership-percentage gap in the top-10 chains, PE chain affiliations, and REIT landlord relationships. M&A diligence teams and healthcare policy researchers use this layer to map controlling-interest structures without rebuilding the quarterly CMS parse pipeline.

Source:CMS SNF All OwnersSnapshot 2026-05-25
Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.Last reviewed: June 2026 · Next review: December 2026 · Data last updated (dataLastUpdated): 2026-05-25About our reviewers →
Bar chart: organizational ownership vehicles in CMS SNF All Owners data — LLC 46,430, Corporation 16,570, Holding company 9,264, Management services 7,283, Financial institution 2,494, Investment firm 802; snapshot 2026-05-25.
Source: CMS SNF All Owners (data.cms.gov) · snapshot 2026-05-25.

Ownership records by role type

Distribution of the 280,207 ownership rows by CMS role code — direct owner, indirect owner, officer, director/board member, managing employee, and delegated official. The majority of rows are governance-role entries, not percentage-bearing ownership stakes — which is why ownership_percentage is missing for such a large share of the top-10 chain records.

SNF ownership record distribution by role type — CMS PECOS All Owners
SNF ownership record distribution by role type — CMS PECOS All OwnersRole 7284KDelegated official53KIndirect owner28KDirector / Board member27KOfficer25KDirect owner19KRole 6311KRole 8610KManaging employee7KRole 714KRole 854KRole 362KOwnership rows
Source: CMS SNF All Owners (PECOS-derived); loaded snapshot date shown above. Fonteum does not promise a quarterly ingest cadence. snf-owners/v1. U.S. Government Works.
Methodology: COUNT(*) GROUP BY role_code_owner. Role labels mapped from CMS-855A disclosure role codes. Null role_code rows excluded.

What is the CMS SNF All Owners dataset?

CMS SNF All Owners is derived from the PECOS (Provider Enrollment, Chain, and Ownership System) and published quarterly via data.cms.gov. It is the only federal dataset that discloses both direct and indirect ownership interests in Medicare-certified skilled nursing facilities. Each row maps an owner — individual or entity — to a specific facility, with the ownership percentage, ownership type (direct / indirect / managing employee / officer / director), and the facility's CCN (CMS Certification Number).

The dataset spans 14,425 facilities and 280,207 ownership rows. It is the primary source for identifying private-equity portfolio companies, REIT sale-leaseback structures, and multi-facility chain affiliations in the long-term care sector. Fonteum joins it to the CMS Care Compare nursing home quality star ratings, PBJ daily staffing data, and the OIG LEIE exclusion list on the facility CCN.

The 82.4% ownership gap — what Fonteum surfaces

A critical limitation of the CMS SNF All Owners file is that ownership_percentage is missing for a substantial share of records — and the gap is not random. Fonteum's analysis (confirmed against the Health Affairs 2024 baseline) found that 82.4% of facilities affiliated with the top-10 national chains have no ownership percentage disclosed in the source file. For all facilities, the missing rate is lower but still significant.

Fonteum does not impute or paper over this gap. Instead, every ownership record carries a DataAvailabilityState flag — disclosed, suppressed_by_source, or missing_from_source — making the data quality signal itself queryable. For diligence workflows, this means analysts know exactly which facilities require additional corporate registry lookups and can prioritize accordingly.

Browse the live ownership surface → · Related research studies →

Who uses nursing home ownership data

Private equity and M&A diligence

Acquirers and lenders evaluating SNF portfolios need facility-level ownership maps, chain affiliation history, and OIG exclusion cross-references. Fonteum's joined dataset — ownership + quality ratings + staffing + exclusions — reduces the data assembly phase of healthcare facility diligence.

Healthcare policy researchers

Academic and government researchers studying PE ownership effects on nursing home quality, staffing, and deficiency rates need the facility-ownership join. Fonteum's CCN-keyed schema links directly to CMS Care Compare quality measures and PBJ staffing records.

Medicaid regulators and state health agencies

State survey agencies responsible for nursing home oversight need ownership transparency to assess affiliate exclusion risk and chain-wide enforcement exposure. Fonteum's provenance-flagged ownership layer documents data gaps that regulators must supplement from state corporate registries.

Frequently asked questions

What is the CMS SNF All Owners dataset?
CMS SNF All Owners is a PECOS-derived ownership-disclosure dataset for Medicare-certified skilled nursing facilities. CMS publishes releases periodically. Fonteum exposes loaded rows for facility- and owner-level queries, but this page does not claim that the newest quarterly release is loaded.
What is the 82.4% data gap and why does it matter?
82.4% of the top-10 nursing home chains — facilities operating under the largest national chains by count — have missing ownership_percentage values in the CMS SNF All Owners source file. This gap was first documented in a Health Affairs 2024 analysis and is reproducible from Fonteum's ingestion of the public CMS file. Fonteum surfaces this gap explicitly in the ownership data surface rather than substituting imputed values. It matters for PE diligence because ownership percentage is the primary signal for controlling-interest determination under OIG affiliate exclusion doctrine.
How does Fonteum structure the SNF All Owners data for analysis?
Fonteum maps the raw CMS ownership CSV to a facility-keyed schema with ownership rows, chain affiliations, and availability flags for disclosed, suppressed, or missing ownership percentages. Dataset-level source metadata identifies the loaded CMS file; record-level provenance fields vary and can be null.
Can I get nursing home ownership data by state from Fonteum?
Yes. The /ownership data surface includes state-level rollups with facility count, missing-ownership-pct share, PE-chain match rate, and REIT landlord match rate for each of the 50 states plus DC. The data-platform export allows state-filtered bulk pulls in CSV or NDJSON format. For a specific state or facility cluster, the audit-pack export includes pre-sliced ownership tables ready for spreadsheet or database import.
Is nursing home ownership data from CMS free to use?
The underlying CMS SNF All Owners data is published under U.S. Government Works and is freely redistributable with attribution. Fonteum's structured schema, provenance layer, gap-documentation, and API infrastructure carry separate commercial terms. The data-platform agreement covers commercial use of the enriched, query-ready dataset; the methodology documentation identifies which fields originate from the government source and which are Fonteum-added structure.

Access the SNF ownership data layer

The Audit Pack includes the SNF ownership table joined to Care Compare quality ratings, PBJ staffing, and OIG exclusions on facility CCN. For diligence-grade exports or custom state/chain filters, contact the data engineering team.

Original analysis · who owns nursing homes

The ownership layer behind 14,425 nursing homes

CMS's SNF All Owners file records

280,207Source: CMS PECOS SNF All Owners · As of 2026-05-25
owner-to-facility relationships across facilities and 85,319 distinct owners — about 19.4 owners per facility once holding companies, management firms, and individuals are counted. Yet of those records list no ownership percentage at all, so the federal file names the parties without quantifying control.

71.43%
Owner records with no disclosed ownership percentage
85,319
Distinct owning parties across all facilities
19.4
Average owning parties per facility
3,928
Owner entities flagged 'created for acquisition'

The vehicles in the ownership stack

Most organizational owners are LLCs — the standard opacity vehicle. Beneath them sit the financialization layers the disclosure rule was written to surface: 9,264 holding companies, 2,494 financial institutions, and 802 investment firms appear directly in the owner records.

LLC46,430
Corporation16,570
Holding company · financialization9,264
Management services company7,283
Financial institution · financialization2,494
Investment firm · financialization802

Related Fonteum data: the nursing-home Care Compare module ties ownership to quality and deficiencies, the staffing dataset links owners to nurse hours, and the OIG sanctions surface flags owners who appear on the federal exclusion list.

Source: CMS PECOS SNF All Owners (data.cms.gov)Last checked: 2026-05-25provenance scope ↗
Data provenance

Methodology

Ownership edges come directly from the CMS SNF All Owners file — not from an aggregator. The pipeline runs in five stages: (1) source acquisition from data.cms.gov, (2) entity resolution on the owner associate ID, (3) owner-to-facility edge construction on the enrollment ID, (4) quality checks against published CMS row counts, and (5) recording available snapshot metadata. Displayed values identify the CMS source and snapshot date; attestation coverage is snapshot-specific, not a signature on each value.

dataset_id
cms-snf-all-owners/v1
source_agency
CMS (data.cms.gov)
snapshot_date
2026-05-25
methodology_version
cms-snf-all-owners/v1

These figures show the source and snapshot metadata available to this page. The optional schema is documented on the data sources reference.

How this data is measured

Source comparison: grain, cadence, and access

SourceData grainCadenceAccessProvenance
FonteumOwner ↔ facility edgesNo platform cadence promised; inspect the loaded snapshot dateAPI + bulk, free baseNullable source metadata
CMS SNF All OwnersOwner recordMonthlyFree CSV, no graphNone (raw file)
Definitive HealthcareParent / systemAnnualPaid subscriptionNone
Academic PE datasetsDeal-levelAd hocResearch requestNone
Primary sources

Sources

  1. Skilled Nursing Facility All OwnersCenters for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Monthly. Primary source ↗ · Archive ↗
    Used for: Owner identity, role, ownership percentage, and entity-type flags per facility.
  2. PECOS Public Provider Enrollment FileCenters for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Monthly. Primary source ↗ · Archive ↗
    Used for: Enrollment backbone the ownership records attach to (enrollment_id key).
  3. Nursing Home — Provider InformationCenters for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), Monthly. Primary source ↗ · Archive ↗
    Used for: Facility identity, star ratings, and Special Focus status joined on the CCN.
  4. Ownership transparency policy basisU.S. Department of Health & Human Services / CMS (Federal Register), As issued. Primary source ↗ · Archive ↗
    Used for: The disclosure rule that requires SNFs to report owners and additional disclosable parties.

Data last updated: 2026-05-25 · Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD · June 2026. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Methodology · Sources · Corrections log · Editorial policy

What’s on file, by the numbers

Platform snapshot · 2026-08-29

13.4Mproviders & companiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities on file
26.2Msource-linked factsSource-linked field facts in the dated platform snapshot
90sources with dataDistinct snapshot source IDs with at least one positive record count
19fresh sourcesDistinct source IDs whose latest positive-data snapshot falls within the preceding 45 days
111sources integratedActive registry rows; integration does not establish a load
13state Medicaid jurisdictionsDistinct states represented in the state-exclusions serving table

Integrated, with-data, and fresh-observation counts are separate. No platform-wide source-completeness count is published. Completeness is source-specific and must be evaluated against the named source's expected scope. State coverage is a separate jurisdiction measure.

Source authority is record-specific

Use the issuer named on the record.

Fonteum spans federal, state, and global public publishers. A source page or returned record identifies its issuer and dataset where that metadata is available. A platform registry count does not assign every page to one authority or establish loaded, fresh, or complete coverage.

Browse source records and their stated limitations →

Reproducible by design

Inspect the evidence each published figure actually supplies.

Source and date

Research pages expose the named public file and observation date where those fields are available. Source-file SHA-256 coverage is separate; facts do not currently link deterministically to signatures.

Available derivation

Studies with a retained release and committed derivation link the SQL or method used. Other studies state the evidence and reproduction limits they actually have.

Daily observations

Dated table row-count observations can detect local drift. They do not imply that an upstream publisher released or Fonteum ingested new data that day.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Request access