Skip to content
FonteumPublic-records evidence
Fonteum Data GlossaryData Standards

NUCC: Definition and Healthcare Context

Full name: National Uniform Claim Committee

The National Uniform Claim Committee (NUCC) is a voluntary organization led by the American Medical Association that maintains the standard professional claim form (CMS-1500) and the Healthcare Provider Taxonomy code set used in HIPAA administrative transactions. NUCC taxonomy codes identify a provider's type, classification, and specialization for purposes of NPI enumeration and claim processing. NUCC publishes taxonomy code updates annually. The complete NUCC taxonomy code set is publicly available and is the authoritative source for all taxonomy codes stored in NPPES.

Source file
Not reported
Published
Not reported
Retrieved
Not reported
Snapshot
Not retained for this reference page
Data as of
Not reported
Last updated: 2026-07-11Reviewed by: Dr. Jennifer Montecillo, MDGullas College of Medicine, 2019. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

How it’s used

  • CMS NPPES NPI Registry: NPPES uses NUCC taxonomy codes to classify every enumerated provider. Fonteum's taxonomy-code data in provider profiles comes directly from NPPES NUCC taxonomy fields.
  • Healthcare Provider Taxonomy code set: NUCC maintains the taxonomy that classifies each provider's type and specialization, the code set behind Fonteum's specialty fields.
  • CMS-1500 claim form: NUCC also maintains the standard professional claim form, anchoring how provider identity flows through HIPAA administrative transactions.

Frequently asked questions

What is NUCC?
NUCC (National Uniform Claim Committee) is the standards body that maintains the CMS-1500 professional claim form and the Healthcare Provider Taxonomy code set.
What does NUCC maintain?
NUCC maintains the Healthcare Provider Taxonomy code set (used in NPPES and HIPAA transactions) and the standardized CMS-1500 professional claim form.
Where can I download NUCC taxonomy codes?
The complete NUCC taxonomy code set is freely downloadable from nucc.org under the Code Sets section.

What’s on file, by the numbers

Platform snapshot · 2026-08-30

13.4Mproviders & companiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities on file
26.2Msource-linked factsSource-linked field facts in the dated platform snapshot
90sources with dataDistinct snapshot source IDs with at least one positive record count
16fresh sourcesDistinct source IDs whose latest positive-data snapshot falls within the preceding 45 days
111sources integratedActive registry rows; integration does not establish a load
13state Medicaid jurisdictionsDistinct states represented in the state-exclusions serving table

Integrated, with-data, and fresh-observation counts are separate. No platform-wide source-completeness count is published. Completeness is source-specific and must be evaluated against the named source's expected scope. State coverage is a separate jurisdiction measure.

Source authority is record-specific

Use the issuer named on the record.

Fonteum spans federal, state, and global public publishers. A source page or returned record identifies its issuer and dataset where that metadata is available. A platform registry count does not assign every page to one authority or establish loaded, fresh, or complete coverage.

Browse source records and their stated limitations →

Reproducible by design

Inspect the evidence each published figure actually supplies.

Source and date

Research pages expose the named public file and observation date where those fields are available. Source-file SHA-256 coverage is separate; facts do not currently link deterministically to signatures.

Available derivation

Studies with a retained release and committed derivation link the SQL or method used. Other studies state the evidence and reproduction limits they actually have.

Daily observations

Dated table row-count observations can detect local drift. They do not imply that an upstream publisher released or Fonteum ingested new data that day.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Request access