Skip to content
FonteumPublic-records evidence
Fonteum Data GlossaryPayer

Explanation of Benefits: Definition and Healthcare Context

Full name: Explanation of Benefits (EOB)

An Explanation of Benefits (EOB) is a document sent by a health insurer to a covered member and provider after a claim is processed, explaining what services were billed, what the plan paid, what was denied, and what the member may owe. EOBs are not bills; they are informational summaries. Under the CMS Interoperability and Patient Access Final Rule, Medicare Advantage and Medicaid plans must make EOB and claims data available to beneficiaries through FHIR-based Patient Access APIs, enabling members to retrieve their claims history electronically.

Source file
Not reported
Published
Not reported
Retrieved
Not reported
Snapshot
Not retained for this reference page
Data as of
Not reported
Last updated: 2026-07-11Reviewed by: Dr. Jennifer Montecillo, MDGullas College of Medicine, 2019. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

How it’s used

  • CMS PECOS Medicare Provider Enrollment: enrolled providers receive Medicare EOBs through the MAC's remittance system (as ERAs), tying payment explanations to PECOS-enrolled NPI records.
  • CMS Interoperability and Patient Access Final Rule: Medicare Advantage and Medicaid plans must expose EOB data through Patient Access FHIR APIs, the interoperability standard Fonteum's data layer mirrors.
  • ASC X12 835 / ERA: the provider-side electronic counterpart of a member EOB is the 835 remittance, linking payment explanations to the enrolled provider's NPI.

Frequently asked questions

What is an EOB?
An Explanation of Benefits (EOB) is a statement from your insurer that explains what was billed for a service, what the plan paid, and what — if anything — you may owe.
Is an EOB the same as a bill?
No. An EOB is an informational document from your insurer. An actual bill comes from the provider and may differ from the EOB.
Can I access my EOB electronically?
Under the CMS Interoperability Rule, Medicare Advantage and Medicaid plans must provide FHIR-based APIs so members can download their claims and EOB data.

What’s on file, by the numbers

Platform snapshot · 2026-08-30

13.4Mproviders & companiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities on file
26.2Msource-linked factsSource-linked field facts in the dated platform snapshot
90sources with dataDistinct snapshot source IDs with at least one positive record count
16fresh sourcesDistinct source IDs whose latest positive-data snapshot falls within the preceding 45 days
111sources integratedActive registry rows; integration does not establish a load
13state Medicaid jurisdictionsDistinct states represented in the state-exclusions serving table

Integrated, with-data, and fresh-observation counts are separate. No platform-wide source-completeness count is published. Completeness is source-specific and must be evaluated against the named source's expected scope. State coverage is a separate jurisdiction measure.

Source authority is record-specific

Use the issuer named on the record.

Fonteum spans federal, state, and global public publishers. A source page or returned record identifies its issuer and dataset where that metadata is available. A platform registry count does not assign every page to one authority or establish loaded, fresh, or complete coverage.

Browse source records and their stated limitations →

Reproducible by design

Inspect the evidence each published figure actually supplies.

Source and date

Research pages expose the named public file and observation date where those fields are available. Source-file SHA-256 coverage is separate; facts do not currently link deterministically to signatures.

Available derivation

Studies with a retained release and committed derivation link the SQL or method used. Other studies state the evidence and reproduction limits they actually have.

Daily observations

Dated table row-count observations can detect local drift. They do not imply that an upstream publisher released or Fonteum ingested new data that day.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Request access