Skip to content
FonteumPublic-records evidence
Fonteum Data GlossaryPayer

Prior Authorization: Definition and Healthcare Context

Full name: Prior Authorization (Precertification)

Prior authorization is a requirement by a health insurer that a provider obtain approval before delivering certain services, procedures, or medications for them to qualify for reimbursement. Used to manage utilization and cost, prior authorization has been associated with treatment delays and administrative burden. The CMS Interoperability and Prior Authorization Final Rule (CMS-0057-F) requires payers to implement FHIR-based APIs for electronic prior authorization beginning in 2027 for Medicare Advantage, Medicaid, and CHIP plans.

Source file
Not reported
Published
Not reported
Retrieved
Not reported
Snapshot
Not retained for this reference page
Data as of
Not reported
Last updated: 2026-07-11Reviewed by: Dr. Jennifer Montecillo, MDGullas College of Medicine, 2019. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

How it’s used

  • CMS NPPES NPI Registry: provider NPI is required in prior authorization requests to identify the ordering or treating provider.
  • CMS Interoperability and Prior Authorization Final Rule (CMS-0057-F): the rule requires impacted payers to build FHIR-based prior-authorization APIs, the interoperability standard Fonteum's provider data aligns to.
  • Medicare Advantage and Medicaid managed care: prior-authorization requirements concentrate in these programs, whose enrolled providers Fonteum identifies by NPI.

Frequently asked questions

What is prior authorization?
Prior authorization (or precertification) is an insurer's requirement for advance approval of specific services, procedures, or medications before they are covered for payment.
What is the CMS rule on prior authorization?
CMS-0057-F requires Medicare Advantage, Medicaid, and CHIP plans to implement FHIR-based electronic prior authorization APIs starting in 2027.
Why is prior authorization controversial?
Critics argue prior authorization delays medically necessary care and imposes significant administrative burden on clinicians and patients.

What’s on file, by the numbers

Platform snapshot · 2026-08-30

13.4Mproviders & companiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities on file
26.2Msource-linked factsSource-linked field facts in the dated platform snapshot
90sources with dataDistinct snapshot source IDs with at least one positive record count
16fresh sourcesDistinct source IDs whose latest positive-data snapshot falls within the preceding 45 days
111sources integratedActive registry rows; integration does not establish a load
13state Medicaid jurisdictionsDistinct states represented in the state-exclusions serving table

Integrated, with-data, and fresh-observation counts are separate. No platform-wide source-completeness count is published. Completeness is source-specific and must be evaluated against the named source's expected scope. State coverage is a separate jurisdiction measure.

Source authority is record-specific

Use the issuer named on the record.

Fonteum spans federal, state, and global public publishers. A source page or returned record identifies its issuer and dataset where that metadata is available. A platform registry count does not assign every page to one authority or establish loaded, fresh, or complete coverage.

Browse source records and their stated limitations →

Reproducible by design

Inspect the evidence each published figure actually supplies.

Source and date

Research pages expose the named public file and observation date where those fields are available. Source-file SHA-256 coverage is separate; facts do not currently link deterministically to signatures.

Available derivation

Studies with a retained release and committed derivation link the SQL or method used. Other studies state the evidence and reproduction limits they actually have.

Daily observations

Dated table row-count observations can detect local drift. They do not imply that an upstream publisher released or Fonteum ingested new data that day.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Request access