Skip to content
FonteumPublic-records evidence
Fonteum Data GlossaryClinical

ESRD: Definition and Healthcare Context

Full name: End-Stage Renal Disease

End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) is permanent, complete kidney failure that requires dialysis or a kidney transplant to maintain life. ESRD is the only condition — regardless of age — that qualifies individuals for Medicare solely on the basis of diagnosis. Medicare ESRD coverage begins the fourth month of dialysis treatment or upon kidney transplant. CMS tracks dialysis facility quality through the ESRD Quality Incentive Program (QIP) and publishes facility performance data on Care Compare. In 2024, approximately 808,000 patients receive ESRD treatment in the United States.

Source file
Not reported
Published
Not reported
Retrieved
Not reported
Snapshot
Not retained for this reference page
Data as of
Not reported
Last updated: 2026-07-11Reviewed by: Dr. Jennifer Montecillo, MDGullas College of Medicine, 2019. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

How it’s used

  • CMS Care Compare — Dialysis Facility: ESRD patient outcomes and dialysis facility quality measures — including adequacy of dialysis, anemia management, and patient safety — are published through Care Compare.
  • CMS Provider of Services (POS) file: dialysis facilities are CCN-keyed in the POS file, letting Fonteum link ESRD facility identity to Care Compare quality measures.
  • Medicare ESRD entitlement: ESRD is the one diagnosis that qualifies a person for Medicare at any age, making dialysis facilities a distinct provider population in Fonteum's data.

Frequently asked questions

What is ESRD?
End-Stage Renal Disease (ESRD) is permanent kidney failure requiring dialysis or a kidney transplant. It is the only condition that qualifies people of any age for Medicare.
When does Medicare cover ESRD?
Medicare ESRD coverage begins the first month of kidney transplant hospitalization, or the fourth month of dialysis treatment.
Where is ESRD quality data published?
CMS publishes dialysis facility quality data — including star ratings, adequacy measures, and patient survey results — on CMS Care Compare.

What’s on file, by the numbers

Platform snapshot · 2026-08-30

13.4Mproviders & companiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities on file
26.2Msource-linked factsSource-linked field facts in the dated platform snapshot
90sources with dataDistinct snapshot source IDs with at least one positive record count
16fresh sourcesDistinct source IDs whose latest positive-data snapshot falls within the preceding 45 days
111sources integratedActive registry rows; integration does not establish a load
13state Medicaid jurisdictionsDistinct states represented in the state-exclusions serving table

Integrated, with-data, and fresh-observation counts are separate. No platform-wide source-completeness count is published. Completeness is source-specific and must be evaluated against the named source's expected scope. State coverage is a separate jurisdiction measure.

Source authority is record-specific

Use the issuer named on the record.

Fonteum spans federal, state, and global public publishers. A source page or returned record identifies its issuer and dataset where that metadata is available. A platform registry count does not assign every page to one authority or establish loaded, fresh, or complete coverage.

Browse source records and their stated limitations →

Reproducible by design

Inspect the evidence each published figure actually supplies.

Source and date

Research pages expose the named public file and observation date where those fields are available. Source-file SHA-256 coverage is separate; facts do not currently link deterministically to signatures.

Available derivation

Studies with a retained release and committed derivation link the SQL or method used. Other studies state the evidence and reproduction limits they actually have.

Daily observations

Dated table row-count observations can detect local drift. They do not imply that an upstream publisher released or Fonteum ingested new data that day.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Request access