Skip to content
FonteumPublic-records evidence
Fonteum Data GlossaryRegulatory

CMS Star Rating: Definition and Healthcare Context

Full name: CMS Quality Star Rating System

CMS Star Ratings are quality scores assigned to Medicare-participating providers, facilities, and health plans on a scale of 1 to 5 stars to help beneficiaries compare quality of care. Separate rating systems exist for nursing homes (Overall, Health Inspections, Staffing, and Quality Measures domains), home health agencies, dialysis facilities, hospices, and Medicare Advantage plans. Ratings are calculated from inspection results, staffing data, and quality measures reported to CMS. Methodologies are published annually in CMS technical documentation.

Source file
Not reported
Published
Not reported
Retrieved
Not reported
Snapshot
Not retained for this reference page
Data as of
Not reported
Last updated: 2026-07-11Reviewed by: Dr. Jennifer Montecillo, MDGullas College of Medicine, 2019. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

How it’s used

  • CMS Care Compare — Dialysis Facility: each dialysis facility receives a 1–5 star overall rating and domain-specific ratings based on clinical quality measures.
  • CMS Care Compare — Home Health Care Agencies: home health agencies receive star ratings based on patient outcomes and CAHPS survey results.
  • CMS Care Compare (nursing homes): the five-star rating system is the primary quality signal for nursing home selection, drawing on PBJ staffing data.

Frequently asked questions

What is a CMS Star Rating?
A CMS Star Rating is a 1–5 star quality score assigned to Medicare-participating facilities (nursing homes, home health agencies, dialysis centers, etc.) based on inspections, staffing, and quality measures.
How are nursing home star ratings calculated?
Nursing home star ratings combine three domain scores: health inspections, staffing levels (sourced from PBJ data), and quality measures. The overall rating is derived from these components.
Where can I find CMS star ratings?
Star ratings are published on CMS Care Compare at medicare.gov/care-compare and are also available as bulk downloads through data.cms.gov.

What’s on file, by the numbers

Platform snapshot · 2026-08-30

13.4Mproviders & companiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities on file
26.2Msource-linked factsSource-linked field facts in the dated platform snapshot
90sources with dataDistinct snapshot source IDs with at least one positive record count
16fresh sourcesDistinct source IDs whose latest positive-data snapshot falls within the preceding 45 days
111sources integratedActive registry rows; integration does not establish a load
13state Medicaid jurisdictionsDistinct states represented in the state-exclusions serving table

Integrated, with-data, and fresh-observation counts are separate. No platform-wide source-completeness count is published. Completeness is source-specific and must be evaluated against the named source's expected scope. State coverage is a separate jurisdiction measure.

Source authority is record-specific

Use the issuer named on the record.

Fonteum spans federal, state, and global public publishers. A source page or returned record identifies its issuer and dataset where that metadata is available. A platform registry count does not assign every page to one authority or establish loaded, fresh, or complete coverage.

Browse source records and their stated limitations →

Reproducible by design

Inspect the evidence each published figure actually supplies.

Source and date

Research pages expose the named public file and observation date where those fields are available. Source-file SHA-256 coverage is separate; facts do not currently link deterministically to signatures.

Available derivation

Studies with a retained release and committed derivation link the SQL or method used. Other studies state the evidence and reproduction limits they actually have.

Daily observations

Dated table row-count observations can detect local drift. They do not imply that an upstream publisher released or Fonteum ingested new data that day.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Request access