Skip to content
FonteumPublic-records evidence
Fonteum · Compare

Multi-source exclusion screening vs single-list checks

Screening only the OIG LEIE catches federally excluded providers but misses state Medicaid exclusions, SAM.gov debarments, and corporate-integrity flags. Fonteum screens the LEIE alongside additional federal and state exclusion source families, NPI-resolved, with available source-and-date metadata on returned matches — the LEIE alone lists

68,055Source: OIG LEIE · As of 2026-05-08
active exclusions.

Published June 17, 2026 · Last reviewed June 2026 · Capability comparison — public facts only

9-capability comparison

From a single-list lookup to defensible, multi-source screening

From a single-list lookup to defensible, multi-source screening
CapabilitySingle-list checksFonteum
Sources screenedOne list — most often the OIG LEIE on its own.OIG LEIE, SAM.gov, and the loaded state Medicaid exclusion lists in one pass.
State Medicaid exclusionsNot caught by an LEIE-only check; many providers are barred at state level only.The supported loaded state Medicaid exclusion lists (including Pennsylvania and North Carolina) screened alongside the LEIE; other states not covered.
Federal debarmentSAM.gov debarments sit outside a single OIG-list check.SAM.gov is included in the exclusion result. OIG Corporate Integrity Agreements and CMS civil-money-penalty records, when an NPI-linked record is available are reported separately.
Identity matchingName or NPI matched against one file, by hand or basic match.NPI-resolved across providers, with the match basis recorded.
Match provenanceA hit, without which list, which version, or what date.Matches expose available source-list, version, and snapshot-date fields; metadata may be absent by source.
Refresh cadenceAs current as your last manual pull.OIG LEIE publishes monthly and the loaded table contains exclusions; other loaded dates vary by source.
Point-in-time evidenceHard to show what a list said on a past date.Past-date reconstruction is limited to retained row history for UK sanctions, procurement awards, provenance claims, OFAC SDN, and UN sanctions; retain the dated response for other lists.
Audit trailA screenshot or CSV, with no integrity chain.The free result stays on screen. The $129 one-off certificate stores PDF and JSON after account roster submission.
DeliveryManual lookups or one feed to wire in.The self-serve workflow checks the first 25 NPIs on screen; the one-off certificate accepts up to 25 NPIs.

Screening one list — most often the OIG LEIE — catches federally excluded providers but not state Medicaid exclusions, SAM.gov debarments, or corporate-integrity flags. Descriptions reflect the single-list screening pattern, not any single vendor.

Why breadth and provenance matter

What a single-list check leaves uncovered

One list is a floor, not the picture

OIG says monthly LEIE screening best minimizes potential liability, and the LEIE lists

68,055Source: OIG LEIE · As of 2026-05-08
excluded providers. But a provider barred by a state Medicaid program or debarred federally on SAM.gov can still clear an LEIE-only check. Breadth across exclusion sources is what closes that gap.

A match is only as useful as its provenance

A bare hit raises a question an LEIE-only screen cannot answer: which list, which version, on what date. Fonteum responses expose the source-list, version, and snapshot-date fields available for a match; fields may be absent by source.

Screening is evidence, not just a yes or no

Compliance programs are judged on the trail, not the verdict. The free result stays on screen. The $129 one-off certificate for up to 25 NPIs stores PDF and JSON artifacts in the customer's account after roster submission.

FAQ

Common questions

Is screening the OIG LEIE enough on its own?
OIG says monthly LEIE screening best minimizes potential liability, but an LEIE-only check is not complete. A provider barred only by a state Medicaid program, or debarred federally through SAM.gov, can still pass an LEIE-only check. Screening additional applicable federal and state exclusion sources addresses the gap a single list leaves open.
What exclusion sources does Fonteum screen beyond the LEIE?
OIG LEIE, SAM.gov, and the loaded state Medicaid exclusion lists are checked for exclusions. OIG Corporate Integrity Agreements and CMS civil-money-penalty records, when an NPI-linked record is available are reported separately. Fonteum does not claim coverage of state lists that are not loaded.
How often is the exclusion data refreshed?
Publisher cadences vary and do not prove a Fonteum load completed. Fonteum's loaded OIG LEIE release was dated May 8, 2026 when checked July 12; the other lists expose their own available observation metadata.
Can I show what an exclusion list said on a past date?
No universal replay is available. The July 12 audit found retained closed-row history only for UK sanctions, procurement awards, provenance claims, OFAC SDN, and UN sanctions. It did not establish replay for LEIE, SAM.gov, or state-exclusion serving rows. Retain the dated response for other lists.
What makes a screening result audit-ready?
The free workflow shows counts and a matched-source breakdown on screen only. The $129 one-off certificate for up to 25NPIs stores PDF and JSON artifacts in the customer's account after roster submission. A single-list lookup that returns a yes or no, with no list version or date, leaves that trail to reconstruct later.
Does Fonteum replace my credentialing workflow tool?
No. Fonteum is the federal and state exclusion data tier those workflows consume, not the workflow itself. A credentialing platform handles task queues, re-credentialing schedules, and continuous monitoring; Fonteum supplies exclusion records with available NPI, source, and observation metadata. Fields may be absent by source. Teams pair the two rather than choosing one.
Request access

Screen against more than one list.

See the exclusion data at /data/oig-leie, browse the full source library at /sources, or screen the first 25 NPIs on screen.

See also
  • /data/oig-leie The OIG LEIE exclusion dataset and refresh cadence.
  • /sources Registered source-family catalog with available tier and cadence details.
  • /data-provenance Available source and date metadata for returned matches.
  • /data Dataset catalog, export concepts, and published screening pricing.

What’s on file, by the numbers

Platform snapshot · 2026-08-04

13.4Mproviders & companiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities on file
26.2Msource-linked factsSource-linked field facts in the dated platform snapshot
90sources with dataDistinct snapshot source IDs with at least one positive record count
77fresh sourcesDistinct source IDs whose latest positive-data snapshot falls within the preceding 45 days
111sources integratedActive registry rows; integration does not establish a load
13state Medicaid jurisdictionsDistinct states represented in the state-exclusions serving table

Integrated, with-data, and fresh-observation counts are separate. No platform-wide source-completeness count is published. Completeness is source-specific and must be evaluated against the named source's expected scope. State coverage is a separate jurisdiction measure.

Source authority is record-specific

Use the issuer named on the record.

Fonteum spans federal, state, and global public publishers. A source page or returned record identifies its issuer and dataset where that metadata is available. A platform registry count does not assign every page to one authority or establish loaded, fresh, or complete coverage.

Browse source records and their stated limitations →

Reproducible by design

Inspect the evidence each published figure actually supplies.

Source and date

Research pages expose the named public file and observation date where those fields are available. Source-file SHA-256 coverage is separate; facts do not currently link deterministically to signatures.

Available derivation

Studies with a retained release and committed derivation link the SQL or method used. Other studies state the evidence and reproduction limits they actually have.

Daily observations

Dated table row-count observations can detect local drift. They do not imply that an upstream publisher released or Fonteum ingested new data that day.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Request access