Skip to content
FonteumPublic-records evidence
Fonteum · Compare

Provenance-tracked provider data vs raw public files

Raw federal files — NPPES, PECOS, CMS Care Compare, OIG LEIE — are free and authoritative, but they ship as undated bulk CSVs with no cross-file identity spine and no per-field lineage. Fonteum publishes supported federal records NPI-resolved, with source and observation metadata where available, across

the documented federal-source catalogSource: Fonteum methodology · As of 2026-07-12
as of June 2026.

Published June 17, 2026 · Last reviewed June 2026 · Capability comparison — public facts only

9-capability comparison

From a bulk download to a queryable, provenance-tracked record

From a bulk download to a queryable, provenance-tracked record
CapabilityRaw public files (DIY)Fonteum
Cost & licensingFree under 17 U.S.C. § 105 — the federal records are public-domain works, no license required.Free to read — the same public-domain federal records, published structured, with no paywall.
Identity resolutionEach bulk file keys on its own identifier; there is no shared NPI spine joining a provider across files.NPI-resolved across sources on one identity backbone — active providers.
Cross-source joinsYou join NPPES, PECOS, OIG LEIE, and Care Compare yourself, reconciling mismatched keys.Pre-joined on NPI and CMS Certification Number so one entity view is reproducible against the files.
Field-level provenanceA bulk CSV carries no per-field source lineage — a number, but not where it came from.Available source, observation date, and limitation fields returned for the supported record.
Freshness trackingThe file carries one release date; there is no per-field last-checked stamp.Source pages state intended cadence; responses expose available observation dates.
Point-in-time historyEach download overwrites the last; reconstructing an as-of view is left to you.Retained versions only for named sources after tracking began; many records have no prior row.
Tamper-evidenceA local copy carries no cryptographic proof of what was fetched or when.Source-file SHA-256 where present; snapshot attestations are separate and historical chain coverage is not universal.
Delivery & APIBulk files only — you build and host the query layer yourself.FHIR R4 API, MCP server, bulk export, and free research CSV/JSON.
Effort to first resultDownload, parse, dedupe, entity-match, then host before the first query.A first query in minutes with a free sandbox key — no sales cycle.

Raw federal files are authoritative and free; the difference is the work between a bulk download and a queryable, provenance-tracked record. Capability descriptions reflect the public bulk-file format, not any single vendor.

Why the gap exists

What a bulk download leaves to you

The files are free — the integration is the cost

NPPES, PECOS, and OIG LEIE are authoritative public-domain downloads, and that is a real strength. The cost lands afterward: parsing multi-gigabyte bulk files, deduplicating, reconciling identifiers, and standing up a query layer before a single answer comes out.

Identity resolution is the hard part

A provider appears in NPPES, in

2.98MSource: CMS PECOS · As of 2026-06-18
PECOS enrollments, and in the OIG LEIE exclusions under keys that do not line up. Resolving one entity across files is the work a raw download leaves undone.

Provenance is what a download cannot carry

A CSV cell is a value with no memory of its origin. When an auditor asks which federal file backs a field and on what date, a field-level provenance record answers; a re-keyed local copy of a bulk file cannot.

FAQ

Common questions

Why not just download the raw NPPES and PECOS files myself?
You can — they are free public-domain works. The work is everything after the download: parsing multi-gigabyte bulk files, deduplicating, reconciling identifiers across files, and hosting a query layer. Fonteum publishes those same federal records already parsed, NPI-resolved, and queryable, so the integration cost moves off your team.
What does NPI-resolved add over the raw files?
Raw files key on their own identifiers, so the same provider in NPPES, PECOS, and OIG LEIE is not linked. NPI-resolution joins those records onto one identity backbone of active providers, so a single provider view is reproducible across sources rather than something you reconstruct yourself.
Is Fonteum's data different from the federal source files?
No — supported records are restructured from public files published by CMS, OIG, and HRSA. Fonteum exposes source and observation metadata where populated; unavailable fields remain null. Check a published figure against its cited source rather than treating the transformed record as a proprietary substitute for the federal file.
What is field-level provenance and why does it matter?
In Fonteum, supported fields expose source name, observation date, and known limitation metadata where populated; unavailable metadata remains null. That context matters in compliance, credentialing, and diligence, where the basis of a data point can carry legal weight. A bulk CSV usually requires teams to preserve that lineage separately.
How does Fonteum stay current versus a one-time download?
A download is a point-in-time file. Fonteum reports each loaded table's available source release and observation dates, which may lag the publisher's declared cadence. Daily row-count observations do not mean daily upstream refreshes.
Is Fonteum free if the federal files are already free?
The data is free to read — the underlying records are public-domain federal works, published openly with no account for static CSV and JSON. The paid pilot tier covers only what costs money to provide: scoped exports, FHIR API throughput, and integration support. You pay for scoping and throughput, not for access to federal data.
Request access

Skip the parsing. Query the federal record.

Browse free research at /research, see the field-level pipeline at /data-provenance, or request access.

See also
  • /sources Registered source catalog with available tier, cadence, and limitation details.
  • /data-provenance How available field metadata ties values to source records.
  • /data Dataset catalog, export concepts, and pilot pricing.
  • /docs/fhir FHIR R4 US Core endpoint reference.

What’s on file, by the numbers

Platform snapshot · 2026-08-04

13.4Mproviders & companiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities on file
26.2Msource-linked factsSource-linked field facts in the dated platform snapshot
90sources with dataDistinct snapshot source IDs with at least one positive record count
77fresh sourcesDistinct source IDs whose latest positive-data snapshot falls within the preceding 45 days
111sources integratedActive registry rows; integration does not establish a load
13state Medicaid jurisdictionsDistinct states represented in the state-exclusions serving table

Integrated, with-data, and fresh-observation counts are separate. No platform-wide source-completeness count is published. Completeness is source-specific and must be evaluated against the named source's expected scope. State coverage is a separate jurisdiction measure.

Source authority is record-specific

Use the issuer named on the record.

Fonteum spans federal, state, and global public publishers. A source page or returned record identifies its issuer and dataset where that metadata is available. A platform registry count does not assign every page to one authority or establish loaded, fresh, or complete coverage.

Browse source records and their stated limitations →

Reproducible by design

Inspect the evidence each published figure actually supplies.

Source and date

Research pages expose the named public file and observation date where those fields are available. Source-file SHA-256 coverage is separate; facts do not currently link deterministically to signatures.

Available derivation

Studies with a retained release and committed derivation link the SQL or method used. Other studies state the evidence and reproduction limits they actually have.

Daily observations

Dated table row-count observations can detect local drift. They do not imply that an upstream publisher released or Fonteum ingested new data that day.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Request access