Skip to content
FonteumPublic-records evidence
Fonteum Care Compare · Tennessee

Tennessee hospices: 60 Medicare-certified, source-cited identity + ownership data.

Ownership type, certification date, and CMS region for every Medicare-certified hospice in Tennessee. CAHPS Hospice experience-of-care measures live in a separate CMS dataset and are not included in this snapshot.

Ownership breakdown — Tennessee

Hospice ownership concentration is the documented quality-of-care variable in policy literature; Fonteum surfaces the breakdown explicitly.

For-Profit
42
Other
7
Non-Profit
6
Unknown
3

Hospice quality measures — what this page can and cannot show

Unlike nursing homes or home health, the CMS Hospice General Information file that backs this page does notcarry star ratings or quality scores. Hospice quality is reported in the separate CAHPS Hospice Survey dataset, and CMS suppressed publicly reported hospice quality measures during the documented May 2026 → February 2028 transition to the new HOPE assessment.

Rather than fabricate a rating, Fonteum renders the fields that genuinely exist for every Tennessee hospice: CMS-certified identity, ownership type, CMS region, and Medicare certification date. When the HOPE-based measures publish, they will land here traced to their source.

Hospices in Tennessee

First 25 of 60 Medicare-certified hospices. The table is an unlinked state inventory.

FacilityCityOwnershipCertified
Alive hospice incNASHVILLENon-Profit04/10/1984
Methodist alliance hospiceMEMPHISNon-Profit08/31/1984
Hospice of chattanooga holdings, llcCHATTANOOGANon-Profit06/30/1986
Amedisys hospice careBARTLETTFor-Profit02/09/1987
Aveanna hospiceSPRINGFIELDNon-Profit07/13/1987
Hospice of cumberland county incCROSSVILLEFor-Profit07/12/1988
Highpoint hospiceGALLATINFor-Profit10/11/1988
Hospice of west tennesseeJACKSONOther10/24/1988
Kindred hospiceCOOKEVILLEFor-Profit11/28/1989
Tennova hospice-clarksvilleCLARKSVILLEFor-Profit02/21/1991
Amedisys hospice an adventa companyKNOXVILLEFor-Profit07/26/1991
Blount memorial hospital hospiceMARYVILLEGovernment11/14/1991
Amedisys hospiceMURFREESBOROFor-Profit03/19/1992
Suncrest hospice - new tazewellNEW TAZEWELLFor-Profit04/02/1993
Lincoln medical home health and hospiceFAYETTEVILLENon-Profit03/05/1993
Amedisys hospice, an adventa companyCHATTANOOGAFor-Profit05/19/1993
Amedisys hospice, an adventa companyELIZABETHTONOther06/30/1993
Baptist trinity home care and hospiceCORDOVAOther08/30/1993
Covenant hospiceKNOXVILLENon-Profit11/15/1993
GentivaNASHVILLEFor-Profit06/20/1994
University of tn medical center home care servicesKNOXVILLEFor-Profit06/09/1994
Henry county medical center hospicePARISGovernment06/24/1994
Smoky mountain home health and hospice, i n cNEWPORTFor-Profit06/23/1994
Gentiva iiSPRINGFIELDFor-Profit06/30/1994
Aveanna hospiceFRANKLINFor-Profit08/01/1994

Tennessee hospices — FAQ

How many Medicare-certified hospices are in Tennessee?
60 Medicare-certified hospices operate in Tennessee as of the CMS Hospice General Information snapshot (2026-05-07). 70.0% are for-profit — ownership concentration is the documented quality-of-care variable in the hospice policy literature.
Does Fonteum show hospice star ratings for Tennessee?
No — and that is an honest data gap, not an omission. The CMS Hospice General Information file that backs this page carries identity, ownership, and certification only. Hospice quality lives in the separate CAHPS Hospice Survey dataset, and CMS suppressed publicly reported hospice quality measures during the May 2026 → February 2028 transition to the new HOPE assessment. Fonteum renders the fields that exist rather than fabricating a rating.
What can I learn from this hospice data today?
For every Tennessee hospice you get its CMS-certified identity, ownership type, CMS region, and Medicare certification date — enough to map the ownership landscape and track when each provider entered the program. Each row reports those fields directly in the state inventory.
Where does this hospice data come from and how current is it?
The displayed fields come from the CMS Hospice General Information file, source-modified 2026-01-08. Fields can be absent; cross-check a consequential hospice record at Medicare.gov.

Compare other facility types

Supported Care Compare facility responses for Tennessee and other states expose source-and-date fields where the module supplies them; individual fields may be absent or null.

Methodology · Sources · Corrections log · Editorial policy

What’s on file, by the numbers

Platform snapshot · 2026-08-29

13.4Mproviders & companiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities on file
26.2Msource-linked factsSource-linked field facts in the dated platform snapshot
90sources with dataDistinct snapshot source IDs with at least one positive record count
19fresh sourcesDistinct source IDs whose latest positive-data snapshot falls within the preceding 45 days
111sources integratedActive registry rows; integration does not establish a load
13state Medicaid jurisdictionsDistinct states represented in the state-exclusions serving table

Integrated, with-data, and fresh-observation counts are separate. No platform-wide source-completeness count is published. Completeness is source-specific and must be evaluated against the named source's expected scope. State coverage is a separate jurisdiction measure.

Source authority is record-specific

Use the issuer named on the record.

Fonteum spans federal, state, and global public publishers. A source page or returned record identifies its issuer and dataset where that metadata is available. A platform registry count does not assign every page to one authority or establish loaded, fresh, or complete coverage.

Browse source records and their stated limitations →

Reproducible by design

Inspect the evidence each published figure actually supplies.

Source and date

Research pages expose the named public file and observation date where those fields are available. Source-file SHA-256 coverage is separate; facts do not currently link deterministically to signatures.

Available derivation

Studies with a retained release and committed derivation link the SQL or method used. Other studies state the evidence and reproduction limits they actually have.

Daily observations

Dated table row-count observations can detect local drift. They do not imply that an upstream publisher released or Fonteum ingested new data that day.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Request access