Skip to content
FonteumThe Graph

By use case

Exclusion & monitoring (self-serve)Free roster screen — no accountExclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & provider-data enrichmentAudit evidence & defensible programsProvider data for AI / RAGM&A & network diligence

By buyer

Compliance & riskJournalists & newsroomsDevelopers & AI teams

By industry

HealthcareProviders & facilitiesSanctionsOFAC / EU / UK / UN / OIG / SAMFederal contractingSAM · USASpending · FAPIIS

The capability layer

APIREST + bulk accessFor AI agentsModel Context Protocol serverFHIR R4 APIBulk exportAudit packSigned report artifacts; source facts remain separately citedReconciliationSource-vs-source diffsAI answers with sourcesHow records link upHistoryRetained versions for named sources

The differentiator

Coverage & sourcesThe catalogFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareFacility qualityAI answers, comparedBrowse all datasets →
Research

The dev on-ramp

DocsAPI referenceConnect your AI agent (MCP)One-paste installFHIR sandboxLive API surfaceQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrations
Pricing
Sign inFree roster screen →Get a signed certificate →

Solutions

Exclusion & monitoring (self-serve)Exclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & provider-data enrichmentAudit evidence & defensible programsProvider data for AI / RAGM&A & network diligenceCompliance & riskJournalists & newsroomsDevelopers & AI teamsHealthcareSanctionsFederal contracting

Platform

APIFor AI agentsFHIR R4 APIBulk exportAudit packReconciliationAI answers with sourcesHow records link upHistory

Data

Coverage & sourcesFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareAI answers, comparedBrowse all datasets →
Research

Developers

DocsAPI referenceConnect your AI agent (MCP)FHIR sandboxQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrations
Pricing
Sign inFree roster screen →Get a signed certificate →
Fonteum Care Compare · North Dakota

North Dakota hospices: 13 Medicare-certified, source-cited identity + ownership data.

Ownership type, certification date, and CMS region for every Medicare-certified hospice in North Dakota. CAHPS Hospice experience-of-care measures live in a separate CMS dataset and are not included in this snapshot.

Cross-check at Medicare.gov →All states →
Snapshot May 7, 2026·13 Medicare-certified hospices in North Dakota · 46.2% for-profit·CMS Care Compare — Hospice·Module overview →·Methodology →·Audit Pack →
Source-modified 2026-01-08 · CAHPS Hospice experience-of-care measures are a separate CMS dataset, not included in this snapshot

Editorial note: North Dakota is a state where source-cited public-data coverage of hospice ownership is materially thinner than national averages — Fonteum prioritizes full provenance + state context here.

Ownership breakdown — North Dakota

Hospice ownership concentration is the documented quality-of-care variable in policy literature; Fonteum surfaces the breakdown explicitly.

Non-Profit
6
For-Profit
6
Other
1

Hospice quality measures — what this page can and cannot show

Unlike nursing homes or home health, the CMS Hospice General Information file that backs this page does notcarry star ratings or quality scores. Hospice quality is reported in the separate CAHPS Hospice Survey dataset, and CMS suppressed publicly reported hospice quality measures during the documented May 2026 → February 2028 transition to the new HOPE assessment.

Rather than fabricate a rating, Fonteum renders the fields that genuinely exist for every North Dakota hospice: CMS-certified identity, ownership type, CMS region, and Medicare certification date. When the HOPE-based measures publish, they will land here traced to their source.

Hospices in North Dakota

First 13 of 13 Medicare-certified hospices. The table is an unlinked state inventory.

FacilityCityOwnershipCertified
Hia hospiceFARGONon-Profit11/17/1983
Trinity hospitals - hospiceMINOTFor-Profit03/30/1988
Sanford home care - hospiceMANDANNon-Profit11/08/1990
Chi health at home - hospiceWILLISTONNon-Profit02/20/1991
Chi health at homeBISMARCKFor-Profit05/28/1991
Chi health at home - hospiceDICKINSONFor-Profit12/04/1991
Heart of america hospiceRUGBYFor-Profit12/01/1993
Jamestown regional medical center hospiceJAMESTOWNOther07/26/1995
Chi health at home - hospiceVALLEY CITYFor-Profit10/17/1995
Sakakawea medical center hospiceHAZENNon-Profit04/02/1996
Ethos hospiceFARGONon-Profit04/24/2018
Caringedge hospice of minotMINOTFor-Profit04/03/2019
Sanford fargo hospiceFARGONon-Profit02/26/2020

North Dakota hospices — FAQ

How many Medicare-certified hospices are in North Dakota?
13 Medicare-certified hospices operate in North Dakota as of the CMS Hospice General Information snapshot (2026-05-07). 46.2% are for-profit — ownership concentration is the documented quality-of-care variable in the hospice policy literature.
Does Fonteum show hospice star ratings for North Dakota?
No — and that is an honest data gap, not an omission. The CMS Hospice General Information file that backs this page carries identity, ownership, and certification only. Hospice quality lives in the separate CAHPS Hospice Survey dataset, and CMS suppressed publicly reported hospice quality measures during the May 2026 → February 2028 transition to the new HOPE assessment. Fonteum renders the fields that exist rather than fabricating a rating.
What can I learn from this hospice data today?
For every North Dakota hospice you get its CMS-certified identity, ownership type, CMS region, and Medicare certification date — enough to map the ownership landscape and track when each provider entered the program. Each row reports those fields directly in the state inventory.
Where does this hospice data come from and how current is it?
The displayed fields come from the CMS Hospice General Information file, source-modified 2026-01-08. Fields can be absent; cross-check a consequential hospice record at Medicare.gov.

Compare other facility types

Supported Care Compare facility responses for North Dakota and other states expose source-and-date fields where the module supplies them; individual fields may be absent or null.

Nursing homesHome healthDialysisAmbulatory surgical centersHospitalsAll modules

Compliance posture

Methodology · Corrections log · Editorial policy

What’s on file, by the numbers

Platform snapshot · 2026-07-15

13.4Mproviders & companiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities on file
26.2Msource-linked factsSource-linked field facts in the dated platform snapshot
—sources liveCrosswalk-resolved sources with a proved content transition in the preceding 45 days
111sources integratedActive registry rows; integration does not establish a load
13state Medicaid jurisdictionsDistinct states represented in the state-exclusions serving table

Built on the authoritative federal record

The primary sources, named on every page.

These are the federal agencies whose public datasets Fonteum ingests and attributes — the issuing authorities, not customers or partners. Every figure on the site links back to one of them.

  • CMS
  • HHS-OIG
  • HRSA
  • FDA
  • NLM
  • NUCC
  • Census
  • BLS
  • BEA

See the full source registry, with license and refresh cadence for each →

Reproducible by design

Published figures name their source and date.

Source and date

Published research identifies its government file and observation date. Source-file SHA-256 coverage is disclosed separately; facts do not currently link deterministically to signatures.

Reproducible SQL

Each study ships the exact query behind its figures, run against the same dated copy of the federal file we used. Re-run it yourself.

Daily observations

The platform records table row counts daily. Those observations detect local drift; they do not imply that an upstream publisher released or Fonteum ingested new data that day.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Fonteum
Platform
Platform overviewAPIFor AI agents (MCP)FHIR R4 APIBulk exportAudit packReconciliationAI answers with sourcesHow records link upHistory
Solutions
All solutionsExclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & enrichmentAudit evidenceProvider data for AI / RAGUse casesM&A & network diligenceCompliance & riskJournalists & newsroomsDevelopers & AI teams
Data & sources
Coverage & sourcesBrowse all datasetsState Medicaid exclusionsFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareNursing homesRecall recordsSanctions screeningOIG LEIE listOwnershipStaffingDeficienciesSpecial Focus Facilities
Federal contracting
OverviewAwards during active exclusionFederal debarment scorecardProcurement questionsContractor lookup8(a) certification guide
Developers
Developer hubDocsAPI referenceQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrationsWebhooks
Research & guides
Research hubLearnHow it worksGuidesHealthcare provider dataExclusion & sanctions screeningProvider credentialing dataHealthcare data for AIHospital margin gapProvider access gapsGlossaryComparisonsSourced data vs plain LLM answersCitationsManifestoWhy Fonteum
Company
AboutPressCustomersPricingContactEditorial policyCorrections
Trust & legal
TrustTrust markQualitySecurityPrivacy policyTerms of serviceAPI termsMedical disclaimer

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

© 2026 Fonteum LLC. All rights reserved.

·hello@fonteum.com

A public-records graph that exposes source and observation metadata where supplied.

Fonteum's provenance ledger contained 26.2M source-linked facts on July 12, 2026. All but 14 carried a source-file SHA-256; 0 linked deterministically to a signature. Inspect a supplied snapshot id at fonteum.com/verify · source-mark coverage and limitations.
Request access→