Skip to content
FonteumPublic-records evidence
Fonteum Care Compare · Wisconsin

Wisconsin home health care agencies: 88 Medicare-certified, source-cited quality data.

CMS Quality of Patient Care star rating, ownership type, and certification status for every Medicare-certified home health agency in Wisconsin — with explicit suppression flags where CMS withholds quality measures because of low patient volume.

Wisconsinquality & ownership at a glance

Aggregates below are scoped to Wisconsin’s 88 Medicare-certified agencies. Ownership type is self-reported to CMS; quality ratings refresh on the CMS Care Compare cadence.

Avg Quality of Patient Care rating, of 5 (Wisconsin)
3.38
Quality-rated agencies
65 / 88
PROPRIETARY
56
NON-PROFIT
22
-
7
GOVERNMENT OPERATED
3

Quality rating distribution & service coverage — Wisconsin

How Wisconsin’s rated agencies spread across the CMS Quality of Patient Care star scale, and the share offering each Medicare-reportable service line. Suppressed (unrated) agencies are excluded from the star distribution.

Quality of Patient Care star-rating distribution

5.0 of 5 ★
5
4.5 of 5 ★
14
4.0 of 5 ★
6
3.5 of 5 ★
9
3.0 of 5 ★
13
2.5 of 5 ★
6
2.0 of 5 ★
8
1.5 of 5 ★
4

Service-line coverage

Service lineAgencies offeringShare
Nursing care8192.0%
Physical therapy7180.7%
Occupational therapy7079.5%
Speech pathology6270.5%
Medical social services4753.4%
Home health aide7989.8%

Home health agencies in Wisconsin

Top 25 of 88 by CMS Quality of Patient Care star rating (65 carry a published rating; the remainder are suppressed for low patient volume). The table is an unlinked state inventory.

AgencyCityOwnershipQuality (of 5)
Ascension at homeSTURGEON BAYPROPRIETARY5
Aveanna home healthBROOKFIELDPROPRIETARY5
Aveanna home healthBARABOOPROPRIETARY5
Aveanna home healthLA CROSSEPROPRIETARY5
Centerwell home healthWEST ALLISPROPRIETARY5
Adoray home health and hospiceBALDWINNON-PROFIT4.5
Alpine care home healthBROOKFIELDPROPRIETARY4.5
Ascension at homeNEENAHPROPRIETARY4.5
Ascension at homeMILWAUKEEPROPRIETARY4.5
Aurora at homeMILWAUKEENON-PROFIT4.5
Avanti home careASHLANDPROPRIETARY4.5
Aveanna home healthMADISONPROPRIETARY4.5
Compassus home healthMARSHFIELDPROPRIETARY4.5
Compassus home healthRHINELANDERPROPRIETARY4.5
Good samaritan society - home careST CROIX FALLSNON-PROFIT4.5
Hannah home health careWAUKESHAPROPRIETARY4.5
Heartland home health (milwaukee)WAUWATOSAPROPRIETARY4.5
Interim healthcare of wausauWAUSAUPROPRIETARY4.5
Preceptor home health southKENOSHAPROPRIETARY4.5
Aspirus at homeWAUSAUNON-PROFIT4
Aurora at homeGREEN BAYNON-PROFIT4
Aveanna home healthWAUPACAPROPRIETARY4
Aveanna home healthEAU CLAIREPROPRIETARY4
Interim healthcare of western wisconsinHUDSONPROPRIETARY4
Preceptor home healthGERMANTOWNPROPRIETARY4

Wisconsin home health agencies — FAQ

How many Medicare-certified home health agencies are in Wisconsin?
88 Medicare-certified home health agencies operate in Wisconsin as of the CMS Care Compare Home Health snapshot (2026-05-07). 65 carry a published CMS Quality of Patient Care star rating, averaging 3.38 of 5.
What quality measures does Wisconsin home health data include?
This page aggregates the CMS Quality of Patient Care star rating — CMS's published composite of the underlying OASIS outcome and process measures — plus the share of agencies offering each service line. The individual OASIS measure rates and HHCAHPS patient-experience scores live in separate CMS companion files and are not part of this identity-and-rating snapshot.
Why do some agencies have no star rating?
CMS suppresses the Quality of Patient Care star rating when an agency has fewer than the minimum number of completed quality episodes in the measurement window. Those agencies still appear in the list but are excluded from the state average rather than counted as zero.
Where does this home health data come from and how current is it?
The displayed fields come from the CMS Care Compare Home Health Care Agencies file, source-modified 2026-03-05. Record-level provenance can be null; cross-check a consequential agency record at Medicare.gov.

Compare other facility types

Supported Care Compare facility responses for Wisconsin and other states expose source-and-date fields where the module supplies them; individual fields may be absent or null.

Methodology · Sources · Corrections log · Editorial policy

What’s on file, by the numbers

Platform snapshot · 2026-08-30

13.4Mproviders & companiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities on file
26.2Msource-linked factsSource-linked field facts in the dated platform snapshot
90sources with dataDistinct snapshot source IDs with at least one positive record count
16fresh sourcesDistinct source IDs whose latest positive-data snapshot falls within the preceding 45 days
111sources integratedActive registry rows; integration does not establish a load
13state Medicaid jurisdictionsDistinct states represented in the state-exclusions serving table

Integrated, with-data, and fresh-observation counts are separate. No platform-wide source-completeness count is published. Completeness is source-specific and must be evaluated against the named source's expected scope. State coverage is a separate jurisdiction measure.

Source authority is record-specific

Use the issuer named on the record.

Fonteum spans federal, state, and global public publishers. A source page or returned record identifies its issuer and dataset where that metadata is available. A platform registry count does not assign every page to one authority or establish loaded, fresh, or complete coverage.

Browse source records and their stated limitations →

Reproducible by design

Inspect the evidence each published figure actually supplies.

Source and date

Research pages expose the named public file and observation date where those fields are available. Source-file SHA-256 coverage is separate; facts do not currently link deterministically to signatures.

Available derivation

Studies with a retained release and committed derivation link the SQL or method used. Other studies state the evidence and reproduction limits they actually have.

Daily observations

Dated table row-count observations can detect local drift. They do not imply that an upstream publisher released or Fonteum ingested new data that day.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Request access