Skip to content
FonteumPublic-records evidence
Fonteum Care Compare · West Virginia

West Virginia home health care agencies: 46 Medicare-certified, source-cited quality data.

CMS Quality of Patient Care star rating, ownership type, and certification status for every Medicare-certified home health agency in West Virginia — with explicit suppression flags where CMS withholds quality measures because of low patient volume.

Editorial note: West Virginia is a state where source-cited public-data coverage is materially thinner than national averages — Fonteum prioritizes full provenance + state context here.

West Virginiaquality & ownership at a glance

Aggregates below are scoped to West Virginia’s 46 Medicare-certified agencies. Ownership type is self-reported to CMS; quality ratings refresh on the CMS Care Compare cadence.

Avg Quality of Patient Care rating, of 5 (West Virginia)
3.52
Quality-rated agencies
45 / 46
PROPRIETARY
38
NON-PROFIT
7
-
1

Quality rating distribution & service coverage — West Virginia

How West Virginia’s rated agencies spread across the CMS Quality of Patient Care star scale, and the share offering each Medicare-reportable service line. Suppressed (unrated) agencies are excluded from the star distribution.

Quality of Patient Care star-rating distribution

5.0 of 5 ★
1
4.5 of 5 ★
9
4.0 of 5 ★
10
3.5 of 5 ★
8
3.0 of 5 ★
10
2.5 of 5 ★
3
2.0 of 5 ★
3
1.5 of 5 ★
1

Service-line coverage

Service lineAgencies offeringShare
Nursing care4495.7%
Physical therapy4495.7%
Occupational therapy3882.6%
Speech pathology2860.9%
Medical social services2554.3%
Home health aide3167.4%

Home health agencies in West Virginia

Top 25 of 46 by CMS Quality of Patient Care star rating (45 carry a published rating; the remainder are suppressed for low patient volume). The table is an unlinked state inventory.

AgencyCityOwnershipQuality (of 5)
Housecalls home healthPARKERSBURGPROPRIETARY5
Amedisys home health of west virginiaCHARLESTONPROPRIETARY4.5
Caring angels home health, llcINWOODPROPRIETARY4.5
Centerwell home healthSOUTH CHARLESTONPROPRIETARY4.5
Centerwell home healthCHAPMANVILLEPROPRIETARY4.5
Centerwell home healthPARKERSBURGPROPRIETARY4.5
Centerwell home healthSUMMERSVILLEPROPRIETARY4.5
Centerwell home healthBECKLEYPROPRIETARY4.5
Centerwell home healthONAPROPRIETARY4.5
St mary's home health serviceHUNTINGTONPROPRIETARY4.5
Adoration home healthVIENNAPROPRIETARY4
Amedisys home health careMORGANTOWNPROPRIETARY4
Amedisys home health of west virginiaBECKLEYPROPRIETARY4
Boone memorial homecareDANVILLEPROPRIETARY4
Dignity home healthCHAPMANVILLEPROPRIETARY4
Grant memorial homecarePETERSBURGPROPRIETARY4
Home care plus, incorporatedLEWISBURGPROPRIETARY4
HomeplusELKINSPROPRIETARY4
Panhandle home health, inc.MARTINSBURGNON-PROFIT4
Valley health home health/west virginiaROMNEYPROPRIETARY4
Care partners home healthWESTOVERPROPRIETARY3.5
Interim health care of morgantownMORGANTOWNPROPRIETARY3.5
Logan arh home health agencyLOGANNON-PROFIT3.5
Mountaineer homecareCHARLESTONPROPRIETARY3.5
Pleasant valley home healthPOINT PLEASANTNON-PROFIT3.5

West Virginia home health agencies — FAQ

How many Medicare-certified home health agencies are in West Virginia?
46 Medicare-certified home health agencies operate in West Virginia as of the CMS Care Compare Home Health snapshot (2026-05-07). 45 carry a published CMS Quality of Patient Care star rating, averaging 3.52 of 5.
What quality measures does West Virginia home health data include?
This page aggregates the CMS Quality of Patient Care star rating — CMS's published composite of the underlying OASIS outcome and process measures — plus the share of agencies offering each service line. The individual OASIS measure rates and HHCAHPS patient-experience scores live in separate CMS companion files and are not part of this identity-and-rating snapshot.
Why do some agencies have no star rating?
CMS suppresses the Quality of Patient Care star rating when an agency has fewer than the minimum number of completed quality episodes in the measurement window. Those agencies still appear in the list but are excluded from the state average rather than counted as zero.
Where does this home health data come from and how current is it?
The displayed fields come from the CMS Care Compare Home Health Care Agencies file, source-modified 2026-03-05. Record-level provenance can be null; cross-check a consequential agency record at Medicare.gov.

Compare other facility types

Supported Care Compare facility responses for West Virginia and other states expose source-and-date fields where the module supplies them; individual fields may be absent or null.

Methodology · Sources · Corrections log · Editorial policy

What’s on file, by the numbers

Platform snapshot · 2026-09-22

13.4Mproviders & companiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities on file
26.2Msource-linked factsSource-linked field facts in the dated platform snapshot
90sources with dataDistinct snapshot source IDs with at least one positive record count
8fresh sourcesDistinct source IDs whose latest positive-data snapshot falls within the preceding 45 days
111sources integratedActive registry rows; integration does not establish a load
13state Medicaid jurisdictionsDistinct states represented in the state-exclusions serving table

Integrated, with-data, and fresh-observation counts are separate. No platform-wide source-completeness count is published. Completeness is source-specific and must be evaluated against the named source's expected scope. State coverage is a separate jurisdiction measure.

Source authority is record-specific

Use the issuer named on the record.

Fonteum spans federal, state, and global public publishers. A source page or returned record identifies its issuer and dataset where that metadata is available. A platform registry count does not assign every page to one authority or establish loaded, fresh, or complete coverage.

Browse source records and their stated limitations →

Reproducible by design

Inspect the evidence each published figure actually supplies.

Source and date

Research pages expose the named public file and observation date where those fields are available. Source-file SHA-256 coverage is separate; facts do not currently link deterministically to signatures.

Available derivation

Studies with a retained release and committed derivation link the SQL or method used. Other studies state the evidence and reproduction limits they actually have.

Daily observations

Dated table row-count observations can detect local drift. They do not imply that an upstream publisher released or Fonteum ingested new data that day.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Request access