Skip to content
FonteumPublic-records evidence
Fonteum Care Compare · Washington

Washington home health care agencies: 71 Medicare-certified, source-cited quality data.

CMS Quality of Patient Care star rating, ownership type, and certification status for every Medicare-certified home health agency in Washington — with explicit suppression flags where CMS withholds quality measures because of low patient volume.

Washingtonquality & ownership at a glance

Aggregates below are scoped to Washington’s 71 Medicare-certified agencies. Ownership type is self-reported to CMS; quality ratings refresh on the CMS Care Compare cadence.

Avg Quality of Patient Care rating, of 5 (Washington)
3.64
Quality-rated agencies
63 / 71
PROPRIETARY
46
NON-PROFIT
17
-
5
GOVERNMENT OPERATED
3

Quality rating distribution & service coverage — Washington

How Washington’s rated agencies spread across the CMS Quality of Patient Care star scale, and the share offering each Medicare-reportable service line. Suppressed (unrated) agencies are excluded from the star distribution.

Quality of Patient Care star-rating distribution

5.0 of 5 ★
6
4.5 of 5 ★
10
4.0 of 5 ★
14
3.5 of 5 ★
16
3.0 of 5 ★
6
2.5 of 5 ★
7
2.0 of 5 ★
2
1.5 of 5 ★
2

Service-line coverage

Service lineAgencies offeringShare
Nursing care6693.0%
Physical therapy6591.5%
Occupational therapy6287.3%
Speech pathology5881.7%
Medical social services5983.1%
Home health aide5374.6%

Home health agencies in Washington

Top 25 of 71 by CMS Quality of Patient Care star rating (63 carry a published rating; the remainder are suppressed for low patient volume). The table is an unlinked state inventory.

AgencyCityOwnershipQuality (of 5)
Alpha home healthEVERETTPROPRIETARY5
Centerwell home healthEVERETTPROPRIETARY5
Eden home healthTUKWILAPROPRIETARY5
Eden home healthSPOKANE VALLEYPROPRIETARY5
Manito home healthSPOKANE-5
Puget sound home healthTACOMAPROPRIETARY5
Assured home healthMOSES LAKEPROPRIETARY4.5
Centerwell home healthTACOMAPROPRIETARY4.5
Central washington health servicesWENATCHEENON-PROFIT4.5
Columbia river home healthKENNEWICKPROPRIETARY4.5
Elite home healthCLARKSTONPROPRIETARY4.5
Evergreenhealth home care servicesKIRKLANDPROPRIETARY4.5
Peacehealth southwest home healthVANCOUVERNON-PROFIT4.5
Providence at home with compassus home health, kingTUKWILAPROPRIETARY4.5
Puget sound home health of king countyTACOMAPROPRIETARY4.5
Tri-cities home healthKENNEWICKPROPRIETARY4.5
Aleca home healthSILVERDALEPROPRIETARY4
Amicable health careSEATACPROPRIETARY4
Centerwell health servicesSPOKANEPROPRIETARY4
Centerwell home healthSPOKANE VALLEYPROPRIETARY4
Chi franciscan health at homeUNIVERSITY PLACEPROPRIETARY4
Eden home healthBELLINGHAMPROPRIETARY4
Kline galland home healthSEATTLENON-PROFIT4
Providence at home with compassus home health, inwaSPOKANE VALLEYNON-PROFIT4
Providence at home with compassus home health, walla wallaWALLA WALLANON-PROFIT4

Washington home health agencies — FAQ

How many Medicare-certified home health agencies are in Washington?
71 Medicare-certified home health agencies operate in Washington as of the CMS Care Compare Home Health snapshot (2026-05-07). 63 carry a published CMS Quality of Patient Care star rating, averaging 3.64 of 5.
What quality measures does Washington home health data include?
This page aggregates the CMS Quality of Patient Care star rating — CMS's published composite of the underlying OASIS outcome and process measures — plus the share of agencies offering each service line. The individual OASIS measure rates and HHCAHPS patient-experience scores live in separate CMS companion files and are not part of this identity-and-rating snapshot.
Why do some agencies have no star rating?
CMS suppresses the Quality of Patient Care star rating when an agency has fewer than the minimum number of completed quality episodes in the measurement window. Those agencies still appear in the list but are excluded from the state average rather than counted as zero.
Where does this home health data come from and how current is it?
The displayed fields come from the CMS Care Compare Home Health Care Agencies file, source-modified 2026-03-05. Record-level provenance can be null; cross-check a consequential agency record at Medicare.gov.

Compare other facility types

Supported Care Compare facility responses for Washington and other states expose source-and-date fields where the module supplies them; individual fields may be absent or null.

Methodology · Sources · Corrections log · Editorial policy

What’s on file, by the numbers

Platform snapshot · 2026-08-29

13.4Mproviders & companiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities on file
26.2Msource-linked factsSource-linked field facts in the dated platform snapshot
90sources with dataDistinct snapshot source IDs with at least one positive record count
19fresh sourcesDistinct source IDs whose latest positive-data snapshot falls within the preceding 45 days
111sources integratedActive registry rows; integration does not establish a load
13state Medicaid jurisdictionsDistinct states represented in the state-exclusions serving table

Integrated, with-data, and fresh-observation counts are separate. No platform-wide source-completeness count is published. Completeness is source-specific and must be evaluated against the named source's expected scope. State coverage is a separate jurisdiction measure.

Source authority is record-specific

Use the issuer named on the record.

Fonteum spans federal, state, and global public publishers. A source page or returned record identifies its issuer and dataset where that metadata is available. A platform registry count does not assign every page to one authority or establish loaded, fresh, or complete coverage.

Browse source records and their stated limitations →

Reproducible by design

Inspect the evidence each published figure actually supplies.

Source and date

Research pages expose the named public file and observation date where those fields are available. Source-file SHA-256 coverage is separate; facts do not currently link deterministically to signatures.

Available derivation

Studies with a retained release and committed derivation link the SQL or method used. Other studies state the evidence and reproduction limits they actually have.

Daily observations

Dated table row-count observations can detect local drift. They do not imply that an upstream publisher released or Fonteum ingested new data that day.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Request access