Skip to content
FonteumPublic-records evidence
Fonteum Care Compare · Utah

Utah home health care agencies: 83 Medicare-certified, source-cited quality data.

CMS Quality of Patient Care star rating, ownership type, and certification status for every Medicare-certified home health agency in Utah — with explicit suppression flags where CMS withholds quality measures because of low patient volume.

Utahquality & ownership at a glance

Aggregates below are scoped to Utah’s 83 Medicare-certified agencies. Ownership type is self-reported to CMS; quality ratings refresh on the CMS Care Compare cadence.

Avg Quality of Patient Care rating, of 5 (Utah)
3.67
Quality-rated agencies
66 / 83
PROPRIETARY
74
NON-PROFIT
4
-
3
GOVERNMENT OPERATED
2

Quality rating distribution & service coverage — Utah

How Utah’s rated agencies spread across the CMS Quality of Patient Care star scale, and the share offering each Medicare-reportable service line. Suppressed (unrated) agencies are excluded from the star distribution.

Quality of Patient Care star-rating distribution

5.0 of 5 ★
9
4.5 of 5 ★
12
4.0 of 5 ★
12
3.5 of 5 ★
10
3.0 of 5 ★
11
2.5 of 5 ★
8
2.0 of 5 ★
2
1.5 of 5 ★
2

Service-line coverage

Service lineAgencies offeringShare
Nursing care8096.4%
Physical therapy7995.2%
Occupational therapy7894.0%
Speech pathology7084.3%
Medical social services7388.0%
Home health aide7894.0%

Home health agencies in Utah

Top 25 of 83 by CMS Quality of Patient Care star rating (66 carry a published rating; the remainder are suppressed for low patient volume). The table is an unlinked state inventory.

AgencyCityOwnershipQuality (of 5)
Active home healthSANDYPROPRIETARY5
Atlas home careLAYTONPROPRIETARY5
Brightenlife home healthMURRAYPROPRIETARY5
Solstice home health, llcSALT LAKE CITYPROPRIETARY5
Symbii davis home healthBOUNTIFULPROPRIETARY5
Symbii home healthLAYTONPROPRIETARY5
Symbii home health bear riverBRIGHAM CITYPROPRIETARY5
Utah home healthOREMPROPRIETARY5
Utah home health - northBOUNTIFULPROPRIETARY5
Ascend home healthLOGANPROPRIETARY4.5
Atlas homecare of southern utahWASHINGTONPROPRIETARY4.5
Community nursing servicesWEST VALLEY CITYPROPRIETARY4.5
Dixie home rehabST. GEORGEPROPRIETARY4.5
Elevate home health, llcPRICEPROPRIETARY4.5
Enhabit home health of southern utahST GEORGEPROPRIETARY4.5
Intermountain homecare home health - mt. pleasantMT. PLEASANTNON-PROFIT4.5
Intermountain homecare ogdenOGDENPROPRIETARY4.5
Primary home healthLEHIPROPRIETARY4.5
Refined healthcare services llcMIDVALEPROPRIETARY4.5
Symbii home health southMURRAYPROPRIETARY4.5
Zion's way home healthST. GEORGEPROPRIETARY4.5
Advanced home health of st georgeST GEORGEPROPRIETARY4
Applegate homecareSOUTH OGDENPROPRIETARY4
At home health careSALINAPROPRIETARY4
Canyon home careMURRAYPROPRIETARY4

Utah home health agencies — FAQ

How many Medicare-certified home health agencies are in Utah?
83 Medicare-certified home health agencies operate in Utah as of the CMS Care Compare Home Health snapshot (2026-05-07). 66 carry a published CMS Quality of Patient Care star rating, averaging 3.67 of 5.
What quality measures does Utah home health data include?
This page aggregates the CMS Quality of Patient Care star rating — CMS's published composite of the underlying OASIS outcome and process measures — plus the share of agencies offering each service line. The individual OASIS measure rates and HHCAHPS patient-experience scores live in separate CMS companion files and are not part of this identity-and-rating snapshot.
Why do some agencies have no star rating?
CMS suppresses the Quality of Patient Care star rating when an agency has fewer than the minimum number of completed quality episodes in the measurement window. Those agencies still appear in the list but are excluded from the state average rather than counted as zero.
Where does this home health data come from and how current is it?
The displayed fields come from the CMS Care Compare Home Health Care Agencies file, source-modified 2026-03-05. Record-level provenance can be null; cross-check a consequential agency record at Medicare.gov.

Compare other facility types

Supported Care Compare facility responses for Utah and other states expose source-and-date fields where the module supplies them; individual fields may be absent or null.

Methodology · Sources · Corrections log · Editorial policy

What’s on file, by the numbers

Platform snapshot · 2026-09-27

13.4Mproviders & companiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities on file
26.2Msource-linked factsSource-linked field facts in the dated platform snapshot
90sources with dataDistinct snapshot source IDs with at least one positive record count
9fresh sourcesDistinct source IDs whose latest positive-data snapshot falls within the preceding 45 days
111sources integratedActive registry rows; integration does not establish a load
13state Medicaid jurisdictionsDistinct states represented in the state-exclusions serving table

Integrated, with-data, and fresh-observation counts are separate. No platform-wide source-completeness count is published. Completeness is source-specific and must be evaluated against the named source's expected scope. State coverage is a separate jurisdiction measure.

Source authority is record-specific

Use the issuer named on the record.

Fonteum spans federal, state, and global public publishers. A source page or returned record identifies its issuer and dataset where that metadata is available. A platform registry count does not assign every page to one authority or establish loaded, fresh, or complete coverage.

Browse source records and their stated limitations →

Reproducible by design

Inspect the evidence each published figure actually supplies.

Source and date

Research pages expose the named public file and observation date where those fields are available. Source-file SHA-256 coverage is separate; facts do not currently link deterministically to signatures.

Available derivation

Studies with a retained release and committed derivation link the SQL or method used. Other studies state the evidence and reproduction limits they actually have.

Daily observations

Dated table row-count observations can detect local drift. They do not imply that an upstream publisher released or Fonteum ingested new data that day.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Request access