Skip to content
FonteumPublic-records evidence
Fonteum Care Compare · Tennessee

Tennessee home health care agencies: 129 Medicare-certified, source-cited quality data.

CMS Quality of Patient Care star rating, ownership type, and certification status for every Medicare-certified home health agency in Tennessee — with explicit suppression flags where CMS withholds quality measures because of low patient volume.

Tennesseequality & ownership at a glance

Aggregates below are scoped to Tennessee’s 129 Medicare-certified agencies. Ownership type is self-reported to CMS; quality ratings refresh on the CMS Care Compare cadence.

Avg Quality of Patient Care rating, of 5 (Tennessee)
3.79
Quality-rated agencies
112 / 129
PROPRIETARY
109
NON-PROFIT
14
GOVERNMENT OPERATED
3
-
3

Quality rating distribution & service coverage — Tennessee

How Tennessee’s rated agencies spread across the CMS Quality of Patient Care star scale, and the share offering each Medicare-reportable service line. Suppressed (unrated) agencies are excluded from the star distribution.

Quality of Patient Care star-rating distribution

5.0 of 5 ★
10
4.5 of 5 ★
30
4.0 of 5 ★
23
3.5 of 5 ★
18
3.0 of 5 ★
21
2.5 of 5 ★
4
2.0 of 5 ★
5
1.5 of 5 ★
1

Service-line coverage

Service lineAgencies offeringShare
Nursing care12697.7%
Physical therapy11589.1%
Occupational therapy11488.4%
Speech pathology10782.9%
Medical social services10682.2%
Home health aide9271.3%

Home health agencies in Tennessee

Top 25 of 129 by CMS Quality of Patient Care star rating (112 carry a published rating; the remainder are suppressed for low patient volume). The table is an unlinked state inventory.

AgencyCityOwnershipQuality (of 5)
Adoration home healthGREENEVILLENON-PROFIT5
Adoration home health martinMARTINPROPRIETARY5
Centerwell home healthKNOXVILLEPROPRIETARY5
Centerwell home healthLEBANONPROPRIETARY5
Centerwell home healthNASHVILLEPROPRIETARY5
Centerwell home healthCHATTANOOGAPROPRIETARY5
Hmc home health, llcSAVANNAHPROPRIETARY5
Homechoice health servicesMEMPHISPROPRIETARY5
Nhc homecare knoxvilleKNOXVILLEPROPRIETARY5
Still waters home health agencyCORDOVAPROPRIETARY5
Accentcare home health of nashvilleFRANKLINPROPRIETARY4.5
Accentcare home health of west tennessee, llcMEMPHIS-4.5
Adoration home healthKINGSPORTNON-PROFIT4.5
Adoration home health and hospice care east tnCLEVELANDPROPRIETARY4.5
Adoration home health brownsvilleBROWNSVILLEPROPRIETARY4.5
Adoration home health care west tennesseeCORDOVAPROPRIETARY4.5
Adoration home health mcminnvilleMCMINNVILLEPROPRIETARY4.5
Adoration home health nashville southBRENTWOODPROPRIETARY4.5
Adoration home health, llcMADISONPROPRIETARY4.5
Amedisys home careWINCHESTERPROPRIETARY4.5
Amedisys home careMEMPHISPROPRIETARY4.5
Amedisys home healthBRENTWOODPROPRIETARY4.5
Amedisys home healthNASHVILLEPROPRIETARY4.5
Amedisys home healthMURFREESBOROPROPRIETARY4.5
Amedisys home health careMORRISTOWNPROPRIETARY4.5

Tennessee home health agencies — FAQ

How many Medicare-certified home health agencies are in Tennessee?
129 Medicare-certified home health agencies operate in Tennessee as of the CMS Care Compare Home Health snapshot (2026-05-07). 112 carry a published CMS Quality of Patient Care star rating, averaging 3.79 of 5.
What quality measures does Tennessee home health data include?
This page aggregates the CMS Quality of Patient Care star rating — CMS's published composite of the underlying OASIS outcome and process measures — plus the share of agencies offering each service line. The individual OASIS measure rates and HHCAHPS patient-experience scores live in separate CMS companion files and are not part of this identity-and-rating snapshot.
Why do some agencies have no star rating?
CMS suppresses the Quality of Patient Care star rating when an agency has fewer than the minimum number of completed quality episodes in the measurement window. Those agencies still appear in the list but are excluded from the state average rather than counted as zero.
Where does this home health data come from and how current is it?
The displayed fields come from the CMS Care Compare Home Health Care Agencies file, source-modified 2026-03-05. Record-level provenance can be null; cross-check a consequential agency record at Medicare.gov.

Compare other facility types

Supported Care Compare facility responses for Tennessee and other states expose source-and-date fields where the module supplies them; individual fields may be absent or null.

Methodology · Sources · Corrections log · Editorial policy

What’s on file, by the numbers

Platform snapshot · 2026-08-29

13.4Mproviders & companiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities on file
26.2Msource-linked factsSource-linked field facts in the dated platform snapshot
90sources with dataDistinct snapshot source IDs with at least one positive record count
19fresh sourcesDistinct source IDs whose latest positive-data snapshot falls within the preceding 45 days
111sources integratedActive registry rows; integration does not establish a load
13state Medicaid jurisdictionsDistinct states represented in the state-exclusions serving table

Integrated, with-data, and fresh-observation counts are separate. No platform-wide source-completeness count is published. Completeness is source-specific and must be evaluated against the named source's expected scope. State coverage is a separate jurisdiction measure.

Source authority is record-specific

Use the issuer named on the record.

Fonteum spans federal, state, and global public publishers. A source page or returned record identifies its issuer and dataset where that metadata is available. A platform registry count does not assign every page to one authority or establish loaded, fresh, or complete coverage.

Browse source records and their stated limitations →

Reproducible by design

Inspect the evidence each published figure actually supplies.

Source and date

Research pages expose the named public file and observation date where those fields are available. Source-file SHA-256 coverage is separate; facts do not currently link deterministically to signatures.

Available derivation

Studies with a retained release and committed derivation link the SQL or method used. Other studies state the evidence and reproduction limits they actually have.

Daily observations

Dated table row-count observations can detect local drift. They do not imply that an upstream publisher released or Fonteum ingested new data that day.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Request access