Skip to content
FonteumPublic-records evidence
Fonteum Care Compare · North Carolina

North Carolina home health care agencies: 165 Medicare-certified, source-cited quality data.

CMS Quality of Patient Care star rating, ownership type, and certification status for every Medicare-certified home health agency in North Carolina — with explicit suppression flags where CMS withholds quality measures because of low patient volume.

North Carolinaquality & ownership at a glance

Aggregates below are scoped to North Carolina’s 165 Medicare-certified agencies. Ownership type is self-reported to CMS; quality ratings refresh on the CMS Care Compare cadence.

Avg Quality of Patient Care rating, of 5 (North Carolina)
3.63
Quality-rated agencies
150 / 165
PROPRIETARY
91
NON-PROFIT
52
GOVERNMENT OPERATED
19
-
3

Quality rating distribution & service coverage — North Carolina

How North Carolina’s rated agencies spread across the CMS Quality of Patient Care star scale, and the share offering each Medicare-reportable service line. Suppressed (unrated) agencies are excluded from the star distribution.

Quality of Patient Care star-rating distribution

5.0 of 5 ★
7
4.5 of 5 ★
22
4.0 of 5 ★
34
3.5 of 5 ★
44
3.0 of 5 ★
31
2.5 of 5 ★
9
2.0 of 5 ★
1
1.5 of 5 ★
2

Service-line coverage

Service lineAgencies offeringShare
Nursing care16298.2%
Physical therapy16298.2%
Occupational therapy15795.2%
Speech pathology14286.1%
Medical social services15090.9%
Home health aide15191.5%

Home health agencies in North Carolina

Top 25 of 165 by CMS Quality of Patient Care star rating (150 carry a published rating; the remainder are suppressed for low patient volume). The table is an unlinked state inventory.

AgencyCityOwnershipQuality (of 5)
Adoration home healthSALISBURYNON-PROFIT5
Amedisys home healthDURHAMPROPRIETARY5
Centerwell home healthDURHAMPROPRIETARY5
Gentiva health servicesWASHINGTONPROPRIETARY5
Interim healthcare of the triad inc.CHARLOTTEPROPRIETARY5
Well care home healthWILMINGTONPROPRIETARY5
Well care home health of the southern triangle, inc.HOLLY SPRINGS-5
Adoration home healthLENOIRNON-PROFIT4.5
Adoration home healthCHARLOTTENON-PROFIT4.5
Adoration home healthHIGH POINTNON-PROFIT4.5
Adoration home healthCONCORDNON-PROFIT4.5
Amedisys home health of chapel hillCHAPEL HILLPROPRIETARY4.5
Amedisys home health of winston salemWINSTON-SALEMPROPRIETARY4.5
Atrium health wake forest baptist -care at homeWINSTON SALEMPROPRIETARY4.5
Aveanna home healthFAYETTEVILLEPROPRIETARY4.5
Centerwell home healthGREENVILLEPROPRIETARY4.5
Centerwell home healthDELCOGOVERNMENT OPERATED4.5
Centerwell home healthCHARLOTTEPROPRIETARY4.5
Centerwell home healthKINSTONPROPRIETARY4.5
Centerwell home healthYOUNGSVILLEPROPRIETARY4.5
Centerwell home healthPINK HILLPROPRIETARY4.5
Centerwell home healthGOLDSBOROPROPRIETARY4.5
Centerwell home healthPOLLOCKSVILLEPROPRIETARY4.5
Interim healthcare of the triadGREENSBOROPROPRIETARY4.5
Pruitthealth at home - wakeRALEIGHPROPRIETARY4.5

North Carolina home health agencies — FAQ

How many Medicare-certified home health agencies are in North Carolina?
165 Medicare-certified home health agencies operate in North Carolina as of the CMS Care Compare Home Health snapshot (2026-05-07). 150 carry a published CMS Quality of Patient Care star rating, averaging 3.63 of 5.
What quality measures does North Carolina home health data include?
This page aggregates the CMS Quality of Patient Care star rating — CMS's published composite of the underlying OASIS outcome and process measures — plus the share of agencies offering each service line. The individual OASIS measure rates and HHCAHPS patient-experience scores live in separate CMS companion files and are not part of this identity-and-rating snapshot.
Why do some agencies have no star rating?
CMS suppresses the Quality of Patient Care star rating when an agency has fewer than the minimum number of completed quality episodes in the measurement window. Those agencies still appear in the list but are excluded from the state average rather than counted as zero.
Where does this home health data come from and how current is it?
The displayed fields come from the CMS Care Compare Home Health Care Agencies file, source-modified 2026-03-05. Record-level provenance can be null; cross-check a consequential agency record at Medicare.gov.

Compare other facility types

Supported Care Compare facility responses for North Carolina and other states expose source-and-date fields where the module supplies them; individual fields may be absent or null.

Methodology · Sources · Corrections log · Editorial policy

What’s on file, by the numbers

Platform snapshot · 2026-08-30

13.4Mproviders & companiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities on file
26.2Msource-linked factsSource-linked field facts in the dated platform snapshot
90sources with dataDistinct snapshot source IDs with at least one positive record count
16fresh sourcesDistinct source IDs whose latest positive-data snapshot falls within the preceding 45 days
111sources integratedActive registry rows; integration does not establish a load
13state Medicaid jurisdictionsDistinct states represented in the state-exclusions serving table

Integrated, with-data, and fresh-observation counts are separate. No platform-wide source-completeness count is published. Completeness is source-specific and must be evaluated against the named source's expected scope. State coverage is a separate jurisdiction measure.

Source authority is record-specific

Use the issuer named on the record.

Fonteum spans federal, state, and global public publishers. A source page or returned record identifies its issuer and dataset where that metadata is available. A platform registry count does not assign every page to one authority or establish loaded, fresh, or complete coverage.

Browse source records and their stated limitations →

Reproducible by design

Inspect the evidence each published figure actually supplies.

Source and date

Research pages expose the named public file and observation date where those fields are available. Source-file SHA-256 coverage is separate; facts do not currently link deterministically to signatures.

Available derivation

Studies with a retained release and committed derivation link the SQL or method used. Other studies state the evidence and reproduction limits they actually have.

Daily observations

Dated table row-count observations can detect local drift. They do not imply that an upstream publisher released or Fonteum ingested new data that day.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Request access