Skip to content
FonteumPublic-records evidence
Fonteum Care Compare · Missouri

Missouri home health care agencies: 122 Medicare-certified, source-cited quality data.

CMS Quality of Patient Care star rating, ownership type, and certification status for every Medicare-certified home health agency in Missouri — with explicit suppression flags where CMS withholds quality measures because of low patient volume.

Missouriquality & ownership at a glance

Aggregates below are scoped to Missouri’s 122 Medicare-certified agencies. Ownership type is self-reported to CMS; quality ratings refresh on the CMS Care Compare cadence.

Avg Quality of Patient Care rating, of 5 (Missouri)
3.40
Quality-rated agencies
109 / 122
PROPRIETARY
73
NON-PROFIT
32
GOVERNMENT OPERATED
10
-
7

Quality rating distribution & service coverage — Missouri

How Missouri’s rated agencies spread across the CMS Quality of Patient Care star scale, and the share offering each Medicare-reportable service line. Suppressed (unrated) agencies are excluded from the star distribution.

Quality of Patient Care star-rating distribution

5.0 of 5 ★
4
4.5 of 5 ★
14
4.0 of 5 ★
29
3.5 of 5 ★
16
3.0 of 5 ★
16
2.5 of 5 ★
17
2.0 of 5 ★
11
1.5 of 5 ★
2

Service-line coverage

Service lineAgencies offeringShare
Nursing care11594.3%
Physical therapy11493.4%
Occupational therapy11090.2%
Speech pathology10082.0%
Medical social services8670.5%
Home health aide8872.1%

Home health agencies in Missouri

Top 25 of 122 by CMS Quality of Patient Care star rating (109 carry a published rating; the remainder are suppressed for low patient volume). The table is an unlinked state inventory.

AgencyCityOwnershipQuality (of 5)
Atlas home health and therapy, llcBRANSONPROPRIETARY5
Centerwell home healthROLLAPROPRIETARY5
Centerwell home healthCOLUMBIAPROPRIETARY5
Healthy family home care, llcELLISVILLEPROPRIETARY5
Amedisys home health of missouriPOPLAR BLUFFPROPRIETARY4.5
Amedisys home health of missouriSPRINGFIELDPROPRIETARY4.5
Angels care home healthMOBERLYNON-PROFIT4.5
Centerwell home healthINDEPENDENCEPROPRIETARY4.5
Elara caringDEXTERPROPRIETARY4.5
Evertrue home healthST. LOUISNON-PROFIT4.5
Fitzgibbon community home healthMARSHALLNON-PROFIT4.5
Hca midwest healthcare at homeKANSAS CITYPROPRIETARY4.5
Mercy home healthSAINT LOUISNON-PROFIT4.5
Mosaic life care home healthSAINT JOSEPHNON-PROFIT4.5
Northeast regional home healthKIRKSVILLEPROPRIETARY4.5
Phoenix home careJEFFERSON CITYPROPRIETARY4.5
Phoenix home care and hospiceSPRINGFIELDPROPRIETARY4.5
Saint lukes home careKANSAS CITYNON-PROFIT4.5
Adoration home healthSIKESTONPROPRIETARY4
Amedisys home health of missouriHILLSBOROPROPRIETARY4
Amedisys home health of missouriJOPLINPROPRIETARY4
Amedisys home health of missouriLEES SUMMITPROPRIETARY4
Apollo medicalSAINT LOUISPROPRIETARY4
Aw health careSAINT LOUISPROPRIETARY4
Benton county health department home health agencyWARSAWGOVERNMENT OPERATED4

Missouri home health agencies — FAQ

How many Medicare-certified home health agencies are in Missouri?
122 Medicare-certified home health agencies operate in Missouri as of the CMS Care Compare Home Health snapshot (2026-05-07). 109 carry a published CMS Quality of Patient Care star rating, averaging 3.40 of 5.
What quality measures does Missouri home health data include?
This page aggregates the CMS Quality of Patient Care star rating — CMS's published composite of the underlying OASIS outcome and process measures — plus the share of agencies offering each service line. The individual OASIS measure rates and HHCAHPS patient-experience scores live in separate CMS companion files and are not part of this identity-and-rating snapshot.
Why do some agencies have no star rating?
CMS suppresses the Quality of Patient Care star rating when an agency has fewer than the minimum number of completed quality episodes in the measurement window. Those agencies still appear in the list but are excluded from the state average rather than counted as zero.
Where does this home health data come from and how current is it?
The displayed fields come from the CMS Care Compare Home Health Care Agencies file, source-modified 2026-03-05. Record-level provenance can be null; cross-check a consequential agency record at Medicare.gov.

Compare other facility types

Supported Care Compare facility responses for Missouri and other states expose source-and-date fields where the module supplies them; individual fields may be absent or null.

Methodology · Sources · Corrections log · Editorial policy

What’s on file, by the numbers

Platform snapshot · 2026-08-29

13.4Mproviders & companiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities on file
26.2Msource-linked factsSource-linked field facts in the dated platform snapshot
90sources with dataDistinct snapshot source IDs with at least one positive record count
19fresh sourcesDistinct source IDs whose latest positive-data snapshot falls within the preceding 45 days
111sources integratedActive registry rows; integration does not establish a load
13state Medicaid jurisdictionsDistinct states represented in the state-exclusions serving table

Integrated, with-data, and fresh-observation counts are separate. No platform-wide source-completeness count is published. Completeness is source-specific and must be evaluated against the named source's expected scope. State coverage is a separate jurisdiction measure.

Source authority is record-specific

Use the issuer named on the record.

Fonteum spans federal, state, and global public publishers. A source page or returned record identifies its issuer and dataset where that metadata is available. A platform registry count does not assign every page to one authority or establish loaded, fresh, or complete coverage.

Browse source records and their stated limitations →

Reproducible by design

Inspect the evidence each published figure actually supplies.

Source and date

Research pages expose the named public file and observation date where those fields are available. Source-file SHA-256 coverage is separate; facts do not currently link deterministically to signatures.

Available derivation

Studies with a retained release and committed derivation link the SQL or method used. Other studies state the evidence and reproduction limits they actually have.

Daily observations

Dated table row-count observations can detect local drift. They do not imply that an upstream publisher released or Fonteum ingested new data that day.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Request access