Skip to content
FonteumPublic-records evidence
Fonteum Care Compare · Massachusetts

Massachusetts home health care agencies: 287 Medicare-certified, source-cited quality data.

CMS Quality of Patient Care star rating, ownership type, and certification status for every Medicare-certified home health agency in Massachusetts — with explicit suppression flags where CMS withholds quality measures because of low patient volume.

Editorial note: Massachusetts has dense local journalism + AARP coverage of home-care services; Fonteum's contribution is the per-agency data layer, not editorial commentary.

Massachusettsquality & ownership at a glance

Aggregates below are scoped to Massachusetts’s 287 Medicare-certified agencies. Ownership type is self-reported to CMS; quality ratings refresh on the CMS Care Compare cadence.

Avg Quality of Patient Care rating, of 5 (Massachusetts)
2.96
Quality-rated agencies
122 / 287
PROPRIETARY
240
NON-PROFIT
32
-
13
GOVERNMENT OPERATED
2

Quality rating distribution & service coverage — Massachusetts

How Massachusetts’s rated agencies spread across the CMS Quality of Patient Care star scale, and the share offering each Medicare-reportable service line. Suppressed (unrated) agencies are excluded from the star distribution.

Quality of Patient Care star-rating distribution

5.0 of 5 ★
4
4.5 of 5 ★
11
4.0 of 5 ★
13
3.5 of 5 ★
26
3.0 of 5 ★
22
2.5 of 5 ★
16
2.0 of 5 ★
7
1.5 of 5 ★
11
1.0 of 5 ★
12

Service-line coverage

Service lineAgencies offeringShare
Nursing care27495.5%
Physical therapy24184.0%
Occupational therapy20772.1%
Speech pathology16758.2%
Medical social services16758.2%
Home health aide24485.0%

Home health agencies in Massachusetts

Top 25 of 287 by CMS Quality of Patient Care star rating (122 carry a published rating; the remainder are suppressed for low patient volume). The table is an unlinked state inventory.

AgencyCityOwnershipQuality (of 5)
Centerwell home healthPITTSFIELDPROPRIETARY5
Croi healthNORWELLNON-PROFIT5
Elara caringBRAINTREEPROPRIETARY5
Patient care solutions, llcDANVERSPROPRIETARY5
Alternative home health care, llcMETHUENPROPRIETARY4.5
Amedisys home health careWAKEFIELDPROPRIETARY4.5
Brockton vnaBROCKTONNON-PROFIT4.5
Caring bees healthcare incQUINCYPROPRIETARY4.5
Centerwell home healthFALL RIVERPROPRIETARY4.5
Centerwell home healthMARLBOROUGHPROPRIETARY4.5
Central home health care, incNEEDHAMPROPRIETARY4.5
Elara caringNEWBURYPORTPROPRIETARY4.5
Metrowest homecare and hospice, an amedisys companyMARLBOROUGHPROPRIETARY4.5
Pivot point homecare services llcWESTBOROUGHPROPRIETARY4.5
Preferred transitions home health care incMILFORDPROPRIETARY4.5
Accentcare home health of massachusettsFALL RIVERPROPRIETARY4
All care vna-greater lynn incLYNNNON-PROFIT4
Amedisys home health careAGAWAMPROPRIETARY4
Aveanna home healthWORCESTERPROPRIETARY4
CaretendersNEEDHAM HEIGHTSPROPRIETARY4
CaretendersHOLYOKEPROPRIETARY4
Centerwell home healthSANDWICHPROPRIETARY4
Community nurse home careFAIRHAVENNON-PROFIT4
Emerson hospital home care programCONCORDNON-PROFIT4
Guardian home health care, llcW BRIDGEWATERPROPRIETARY4

Massachusetts home health agencies — FAQ

How many Medicare-certified home health agencies are in Massachusetts?
287 Medicare-certified home health agencies operate in Massachusetts as of the CMS Care Compare Home Health snapshot (2026-05-07). 122 carry a published CMS Quality of Patient Care star rating, averaging 2.96 of 5.
What quality measures does Massachusetts home health data include?
This page aggregates the CMS Quality of Patient Care star rating — CMS's published composite of the underlying OASIS outcome and process measures — plus the share of agencies offering each service line. The individual OASIS measure rates and HHCAHPS patient-experience scores live in separate CMS companion files and are not part of this identity-and-rating snapshot.
Why do some agencies have no star rating?
CMS suppresses the Quality of Patient Care star rating when an agency has fewer than the minimum number of completed quality episodes in the measurement window. Those agencies still appear in the list but are excluded from the state average rather than counted as zero.
Where does this home health data come from and how current is it?
The displayed fields come from the CMS Care Compare Home Health Care Agencies file, source-modified 2026-03-05. Record-level provenance can be null; cross-check a consequential agency record at Medicare.gov.

Compare other facility types

Supported Care Compare facility responses for Massachusetts and other states expose source-and-date fields where the module supplies them; individual fields may be absent or null.

Methodology · Sources · Corrections log · Editorial policy

What’s on file, by the numbers

Platform snapshot · 2026-08-12

13.4Mproviders & companiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities on file
26.2Msource-linked factsSource-linked field facts in the dated platform snapshot
90sources with dataDistinct snapshot source IDs with at least one positive record count
73fresh sourcesDistinct source IDs whose latest positive-data snapshot falls within the preceding 45 days
111sources integratedActive registry rows; integration does not establish a load
13state Medicaid jurisdictionsDistinct states represented in the state-exclusions serving table

Integrated, with-data, and fresh-observation counts are separate. No platform-wide source-completeness count is published. Completeness is source-specific and must be evaluated against the named source's expected scope. State coverage is a separate jurisdiction measure.

Source authority is record-specific

Use the issuer named on the record.

Fonteum spans federal, state, and global public publishers. A source page or returned record identifies its issuer and dataset where that metadata is available. A platform registry count does not assign every page to one authority or establish loaded, fresh, or complete coverage.

Browse source records and their stated limitations →

Reproducible by design

Inspect the evidence each published figure actually supplies.

Source and date

Research pages expose the named public file and observation date where those fields are available. Source-file SHA-256 coverage is separate; facts do not currently link deterministically to signatures.

Available derivation

Studies with a retained release and committed derivation link the SQL or method used. Other studies state the evidence and reproduction limits they actually have.

Daily observations

Dated table row-count observations can detect local drift. They do not imply that an upstream publisher released or Fonteum ingested new data that day.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Request access