Skip to content
FonteumThe Graph

By use case

Exclusion & monitoring (self-serve)Free roster screen — no accountExclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & provider-data enrichmentAudit evidence & defensible programsProvider data for AI / RAGM&A & network diligence

By buyer

Compliance & riskJournalists & newsroomsDevelopers & AI teams

By industry

HealthcareProviders & facilitiesSanctionsOFAC / EU / UK / UN / OIG / SAMFederal contractingSAM · USASpending · FAPIIS

The capability layer

APIREST + bulk accessFor AI agentsModel Context Protocol serverFHIR R4 APIBulk exportAudit packSigned report artifacts; source facts remain separately citedReconciliationSource-vs-source diffsAI answers with sourcesHow records link upHistoryRetained versions for named sources

The differentiator

Coverage & sourcesThe catalogFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareFacility qualityAI answers, comparedBrowse all datasets →
Research

The dev on-ramp

DocsAPI referenceConnect your AI agent (MCP)One-paste installFHIR sandboxLive API surfaceQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrations
Pricing
Sign inFree roster screen →Get a signed certificate →

Solutions

Exclusion & monitoring (self-serve)Exclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & provider-data enrichmentAudit evidence & defensible programsProvider data for AI / RAGM&A & network diligenceCompliance & riskJournalists & newsroomsDevelopers & AI teamsHealthcareSanctionsFederal contracting

Platform

APIFor AI agentsFHIR R4 APIBulk exportAudit packReconciliationAI answers with sourcesHow records link upHistory

Data

Coverage & sourcesFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareAI answers, comparedBrowse all datasets →
Research

Developers

DocsAPI referenceConnect your AI agent (MCP)FHIR sandboxQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrations
Pricing
Sign inFree roster screen →Get a signed certificate →
Fonteum Care Compare · Georgia

Georgia home health care agencies: 104 Medicare-certified, source-cited quality data.

CMS Quality of Patient Care star rating, ownership type, and certification status for every Medicare-certified home health agency in Georgia — with explicit suppression flags where CMS withholds quality measures because of low patient volume.

Cross-check at Medicare.gov →All states →
Snapshot May 7, 2026·104 Medicare-certified home health agencies in Georgia · 94.2% quality-rated·CMS Care Compare — Home Health·Module overview →·Methodology →·Audit Pack →
Source-modified 2026-03-05 · State-scoped subset of CMS national snapshot · Quality measures suppressed when patient volume <11 in measure window

Georgiaquality & ownership at a glance

Aggregates below are scoped to Georgia’s 104 Medicare-certified agencies. Ownership type is self-reported to CMS; quality ratings refresh on the CMS Care Compare cadence.

Avg Quality of Patient Care rating, of 5 (Georgia)
3.52
Quality-rated agencies
98 / 104
PROPRIETARY
85
NON-PROFIT
14
-
3
GOVERNMENT OPERATED
2

Quality rating distribution & service coverage — Georgia

How Georgia’s rated agencies spread across the CMS Quality of Patient Care star scale, and the share offering each Medicare-reportable service line. Suppressed (unrated) agencies are excluded from the star distribution.

Quality of Patient Care star-rating distribution

5.0 of 5 ★
3
4.5 of 5 ★
13
4.0 of 5 ★
28
3.5 of 5 ★
18
3.0 of 5 ★
19
2.5 of 5 ★
12
2.0 of 5 ★
3
1.5 of 5 ★
2

Service-line coverage

Service lineAgencies offeringShare
Nursing care10197.1%
Physical therapy9894.2%
Occupational therapy9389.4%
Speech pathology9389.4%
Medical social services9086.5%
Home health aide8682.7%

Home health agencies in Georgia

Top 25 of 104 by CMS Quality of Patient Care star rating (98 carry a published rating; the remainder are suppressed for low patient volume). The table is an unlinked state inventory.

AgencyCityOwnershipQuality (of 5)
Centerwell home healthSTATESBOROPROPRIETARY5
Centerwell home healthSAVANNAHPROPRIETARY5
Hamilton home healthDALTONNON-PROFIT5
Amedisys home health careAUGUSTAPROPRIETARY4.5
Amedisys home health of griffinGRIFFINPROPRIETARY4.5
Amedisys home health of valdostaVALDOSTAPROPRIETARY4.5
Aveanna home healthSMYRNAPROPRIETARY4.5
Centerwell home healthKENNESAWPROPRIETARY4.5
Centerwell home healthATLANTAPROPRIETARY4.5
Central hh care, an amedisys companyATLANTAPROPRIETARY4.5
Colquitt regional home careMOULTRIENON-PROFIT4.5
Community home health, an amedisys companyWOODSTOCKPROPRIETARY4.5
Csra home health agency columbia, inc.THOMSONPROPRIETARY4.5
North georgia home health agency, an amedysis compRINGGOLDPROPRIETARY4.5
Suncrest home healthSMYRNAPROPRIETARY4.5
Suncrest home health servicesDOUGLASPROPRIETARY4.5
Accentcare home health of northeast georgiaBUFORDPROPRIETARY4
Adoration home healthCOVINGTONPROPRIETARY4
Amedisys home healthVIDALIAPROPRIETARY4
Amedisys home healthWAYCROSSPROPRIETARY4
Amedisys home healthTIFTONPROPRIETARY4
Amedisys home healthSAVANNAHPROPRIETARY4
Amedisys home health of covingtonCOVINGTONPROPRIETARY4
Amedisys home health of maconMACONPROPRIETARY4
Amedisys northwest home healthJASPERPROPRIETARY4

Georgia home health agencies — FAQ

How many Medicare-certified home health agencies are in Georgia?
104 Medicare-certified home health agencies operate in Georgia as of the CMS Care Compare Home Health snapshot (2026-05-07). 98 carry a published CMS Quality of Patient Care star rating, averaging 3.52 of 5.
What quality measures does Georgia home health data include?
This page aggregates the CMS Quality of Patient Care star rating — CMS's published composite of the underlying OASIS outcome and process measures — plus the share of agencies offering each service line. The individual OASIS measure rates and HHCAHPS patient-experience scores live in separate CMS companion files and are not part of this identity-and-rating snapshot.
Why do some agencies have no star rating?
CMS suppresses the Quality of Patient Care star rating when an agency has fewer than the minimum number of completed quality episodes in the measurement window. Those agencies still appear in the list but are excluded from the state average rather than counted as zero.
Where does this home health data come from and how current is it?
The displayed fields come from the CMS Care Compare Home Health Care Agencies file, source-modified 2026-03-05. Record-level provenance can be null; cross-check a consequential agency record at Medicare.gov.

Compare other facility types

Supported Care Compare facility responses for Georgia and other states expose source-and-date fields where the module supplies them; individual fields may be absent or null.

Nursing homesHospiceDialysisAmbulatory surgical centersHospitalsAll modules

Compliance posture

Methodology · Corrections log · Editorial policy

What’s on file, by the numbers

Platform snapshot · 2026-07-15

13.4Mproviders & companiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities on file
26.2Msource-linked factsSource-linked field facts in the dated platform snapshot
—sources liveCrosswalk-resolved sources with a proved content transition in the preceding 45 days
111sources integratedActive registry rows; integration does not establish a load
13state Medicaid jurisdictionsDistinct states represented in the state-exclusions serving table

Built on the authoritative federal record

The primary sources, named on every page.

These are the federal agencies whose public datasets Fonteum ingests and attributes — the issuing authorities, not customers or partners. Every figure on the site links back to one of them.

  • CMS
  • HHS-OIG
  • HRSA
  • FDA
  • NLM
  • NUCC
  • Census
  • BLS
  • BEA

See the full source registry, with license and refresh cadence for each →

Reproducible by design

Published figures name their source and date.

Source and date

Published research identifies its government file and observation date. Source-file SHA-256 coverage is disclosed separately; facts do not currently link deterministically to signatures.

Reproducible SQL

Each study ships the exact query behind its figures, run against the same dated copy of the federal file we used. Re-run it yourself.

Daily observations

The platform records table row counts daily. Those observations detect local drift; they do not imply that an upstream publisher released or Fonteum ingested new data that day.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Fonteum
Platform
Platform overviewAPIFor AI agents (MCP)FHIR R4 APIBulk exportAudit packReconciliationAI answers with sourcesHow records link upHistory
Solutions
All solutionsExclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & enrichmentAudit evidenceProvider data for AI / RAGUse casesM&A & network diligenceCompliance & riskJournalists & newsroomsDevelopers & AI teams
Data & sources
Coverage & sourcesBrowse all datasetsState Medicaid exclusionsFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareNursing homesRecall recordsSanctions screeningOIG LEIE listOwnershipStaffingDeficienciesSpecial Focus Facilities
Federal contracting
OverviewAwards during active exclusionFederal debarment scorecardProcurement questionsContractor lookup8(a) certification guide
Developers
Developer hubDocsAPI referenceQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrationsWebhooks
Research & guides
Research hubLearnHow it worksGuidesHealthcare provider dataExclusion & sanctions screeningProvider credentialing dataHealthcare data for AIHospital margin gapProvider access gapsGlossaryComparisonsSourced data vs plain LLM answersCitationsManifestoWhy Fonteum
Company
AboutPressCustomersPricingContactEditorial policyCorrections
Trust & legal
TrustTrust markQualitySecurityPrivacy policyTerms of serviceAPI termsMedical disclaimer

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

© 2026 Fonteum LLC. All rights reserved.

·hello@fonteum.com

A public-records graph that exposes source and observation metadata where supplied.

Fonteum's provenance ledger contained 26.2M source-linked facts on July 12, 2026. All but 14 carried a source-file SHA-256; 0 linked deterministically to a signature. Inspect a supplied snapshot id at fonteum.com/verify · source-mark coverage and limitations.
Request access→