Skip to content
FonteumPublic-records evidence
Fonteum Care Compare · Wyoming

Wyoming ambulatory surgical centers: 20 Medicare-certified, ASC quality measures with NPI bridge.

Per-facility ASC-1 through ASC-12 quality measures with deterministic NPI bridge (100.0% NPI coverage in Wyoming) — the only Care Compare facility type with a usable provider-identity join key.

Editorial note: Wyoming is a state where source-cited public-data coverage of ASC quality is materially thinner than national averages — Fonteum prioritizes full provenance + state context here.

ASC-12 performance breakdown — Wyoming

ASC-12 measures hospital-visit rate within 7 days of outpatient surgery. CMS-published performance categories on facilities meeting the volume threshold.

No Different Than the National Rate
11
N/A
7
Number of Cases Too Small
2

ASC-1 through ASC-11 quality measures — Wyoming state means

Each row is the mean CMS-published rate across Wyomingfacilities that meet the measure’s reporting threshold. Lower is better for adverse-event measures; higher is better for the prophylactic-antibiotic process measure. Facilities CMS suppressed for low case volume are excluded from the mean, not counted as zero.

MeasureDirectionState meanFacilities reporting
Patient burn rateLower is better0.00%14
Unplanned hospital transfer/admissionLower is better0.01%16
Wrong site, side, patient, or procedureLower is better0.00%14
All-cause hospital readmission rateLower is better0.08%17
Appropriate prophylactic antibiotic useHigher is better74.20%10

Highest-volume ASCs — Wyoming

Top 20 by ASC-12 reportable case volume (a procedural-volume signal, not a quality measure).

FacilityCityASC-12 casesCategory
Wyoming endoscopy centerCHEYENNE2261No Different Than the National Rate
Casper wyoming endoscopy asc llc dba sterling surgical centerCASPER1711No Different Than the National Rate
Central wyoming outpatient surgery center llcCASPER739No Different Than the National Rate
Sweetwater surgery center llcROCK SPRINGS573No Different Than the National Rate
Center for surgical excellence incGILLETTE558No Different Than the National Rate
Sheridan surgical center llcSHERIDAN341No Different Than the National Rate
Northern wyoming surgical centerCODY286No Different Than the National Rate
Teton outpatient services llcJACKSON220No Different Than the National Rate
Premier surgical center llcEVANSTON187No Different Than the National Rate
Premier bone and joint centersLARAMIE103No Different Than the National Rate
Advanced surgical care of wyoming llcGILLETTE36No Different Than the National Rate
Poder river surgery center llcGILLETTE—Number of Cases Too Small
Western wyoming medical llcLANDER—N/A
Cheyenne eye surgeryCHEYENNE—N/A
Lagreca eye clinic pcLANDER—N/A
Western ambulatory surgery llcCASPER—N/A
Cheyenne surgical center llcCHEYENNE—Number of Cases Too Small
Cheyenne skin clinicCHEYENNE—N/A
Northeast wyoming surgery center llcGILLETTE—N/A
Wyoming surgical center llcCASPER—N/A

Wyoming ambulatory surgical centers — FAQ

How many ambulatory surgical centers are Medicare-certified in Wyoming?
20 Medicare-certified ambulatory surgical centers operate in Wyoming as of the CMS Care Compare ASC Quality snapshot (2026-05-07). Every facility carries a National Provider Identifier — ASCs are the only Care Compare facility type with a 100% deterministic NPI bridge.
What ASC quality measures does Wyoming report?
CMS publishes ASC-1 through ASC-12. This page aggregates the state mean for the per-facility rate measures that have at least one reporting facility in Wyoming, plus the ASC-12 colonoscopy follow-up performance category. Measures are CMS-published rates: lower is better for adverse-event measures (burns, transfers, wrong-site events, readmissions, cataract complications) and higher is better for appropriate prophylactic antibiotic use.
Why are some facilities missing a quality rate?
CMS suppresses a measure when a facility falls below the minimum case volume for that measure in the reporting window. Suppressed facilities are excluded from each state mean rather than counted as zero, so the averages reflect only facilities CMS actually scored.
Where does this ASC data come from and how current is it?
The displayed fields come from the CMS Care Compare Ambulatory Surgical Center Quality file, source-modified 2025-12-16. Record-level provenance can be null; cross-check a consequential facility record at Medicare.gov.

Compare other facility types

Supported Care Compare facility responses for Wyoming and other states expose source-and-date fields where the module supplies them; individual fields may be absent or null.

Methodology · Sources · Corrections log · Editorial policy

What’s on file, by the numbers

Platform snapshot · 2026-10-04

13.4Mproviders & companiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities on file
26.2Msource-linked factsSource-linked field facts in the dated platform snapshot
90sources with dataDistinct snapshot source IDs with at least one positive record count
11fresh sourcesDistinct source IDs whose latest positive-data snapshot falls within the preceding 45 days
111sources integratedActive registry rows; integration does not establish a load
13state Medicaid jurisdictionsDistinct states represented in the state-exclusions serving table

Integrated, with-data, and fresh-observation counts are separate. No platform-wide source-completeness count is published. Completeness is source-specific and must be evaluated against the named source's expected scope. State coverage is a separate jurisdiction measure.

Source authority is record-specific

Use the issuer named on the record.

Fonteum spans federal, state, and global public publishers. A source page or returned record identifies its issuer and dataset where that metadata is available. A platform registry count does not assign every page to one authority or establish loaded, fresh, or complete coverage.

Browse source records and their stated limitations →

Reproducible by design

Inspect the evidence each published figure actually supplies.

Source and date

Research pages expose the named public file and observation date where those fields are available. Source-file SHA-256 coverage is separate; facts do not currently link deterministically to signatures.

Available derivation

Studies with a retained release and committed derivation link the SQL or method used. Other studies state the evidence and reproduction limits they actually have.

Daily observations

Dated table row-count observations can detect local drift. They do not imply that an upstream publisher released or Fonteum ingested new data that day.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Request access