Skip to content
FonteumPublic-records evidence
Fonteum Care Compare · Virginia

Virginia ambulatory surgical centers: 68 Medicare-certified, ASC quality measures with NPI bridge.

Per-facility ASC-1 through ASC-12 quality measures with deterministic NPI bridge (100.0% NPI coverage in Virginia) — the only Care Compare facility type with a usable provider-identity join key.

ASC-12 performance breakdown — Virginia

ASC-12 measures hospital-visit rate within 7 days of outpatient surgery. CMS-published performance categories on facilities meeting the volume threshold.

N/A
49
No Different Than the National Rate
18
Number of Cases Too Small
1

ASC-1 through ASC-11 quality measures — Virginia state means

Each row is the mean CMS-published rate across Virginiafacilities that meet the measure’s reporting threshold. Lower is better for adverse-event measures; higher is better for the prophylactic-antibiotic process measure. Facilities CMS suppressed for low case volume are excluded from the mean, not counted as zero.

MeasureDirectionState meanFacilities reporting
Patient burn rateLower is better0.00%32
Unplanned hospital transfer/admissionLower is better0.02%43
Wrong site, side, patient, or procedureLower is better0.01%35
All-cause hospital readmission rateLower is better0.16%55
Appropriate prophylactic antibiotic useHigher is better90.02%15

Highest-volume ASCs — Virginia

Top 25 by ASC-12 reportable case volume (a procedural-volume signal, not a quality measure).

FacilityCityASC-12 casesCategory
Fredericksburg endoscopy centerFREDERICKSBURG3709No Different Than the National Rate
Prince william ambulatory surgery centerMANASSAS2976No Different Than the National Rate
Franconiaspringfield surgery center llcALEXANDRIA2919No Different Than the National Rate
Inova ambulatory surgery center at lorton llcLORTON2919No Different Than the National Rate
Mclean ambulatory surgery llcMCLEAN2477No Different Than the National Rate
Central virginia surgi center lp dba surgi center of central virginiaFREDERICKSBURG2418No Different Than the National Rate
Reston surgery center lpRESTON2370No Different Than the National Rate
Roanoke surgery center lpSALEM2171No Different Than the National Rate
Northern virginia surgery center llcFAIRFAX1990No Different Than the National Rate
Inova loudoun ambulatory surgery center llcLEESBURG1558No Different Than the National Rate
Colon and rectal endoscopy and surgery center llcMECHANICSVILLE1528No Different Than the National Rate
Stony point surgery center llcRICHMOND639No Different Than the National Rate
Stony point surgery center l l cRICHMOND639No Different Than the National Rate
Bayview medical center incSUFFOLK563No Different Than the National Rate
Culpeper surgery center llcCULPEPER510No Different Than the National Rate
Mccone mt vernon endoscopy centerALEXANDRIA477No Different Than the National Rate
Danville gastroenterology center pcDANVILLE226No Different Than the National Rate
Carilion surgery center new river valley llcCHRISTIANSBURG128No Different Than the National Rate
Roanoke ambulatory surgery center llcROANOKEN/A
Roanoke valley center for sight llcSALEMN/A
Med atlantic incRICHMONDN/A
St marys ambulatory surgery centerRICHMONDN/A
Virginia eye institute incRICHMONDN/A
Virginia center for eye surgeryVIRGINIA BEACHN/A
Chesapeake regional surgery center at virginia beachVIRGINIA BEACHN/A

Virginia ambulatory surgical centers — FAQ

How many ambulatory surgical centers are Medicare-certified in Virginia?
68 Medicare-certified ambulatory surgical centers operate in Virginia as of the CMS Care Compare ASC Quality snapshot (2026-05-07). Every facility carries a National Provider Identifier — ASCs are the only Care Compare facility type with a 100% deterministic NPI bridge.
What ASC quality measures does Virginia report?
CMS publishes ASC-1 through ASC-12. This page aggregates the state mean for the per-facility rate measures that have at least one reporting facility in Virginia, plus the ASC-12 colonoscopy follow-up performance category. Measures are CMS-published rates: lower is better for adverse-event measures (burns, transfers, wrong-site events, readmissions, cataract complications) and higher is better for appropriate prophylactic antibiotic use.
Why are some facilities missing a quality rate?
CMS suppresses a measure when a facility falls below the minimum case volume for that measure in the reporting window. Suppressed facilities are excluded from each state mean rather than counted as zero, so the averages reflect only facilities CMS actually scored.
Where does this ASC data come from and how current is it?
The displayed fields come from the CMS Care Compare Ambulatory Surgical Center Quality file, source-modified 2025-12-16. Record-level provenance can be null; cross-check a consequential facility record at Medicare.gov.

Compare other facility types

Supported Care Compare facility responses for Virginia and other states expose source-and-date fields where the module supplies them; individual fields may be absent or null.

Methodology · Sources · Corrections log · Editorial policy

What’s on file, by the numbers

Platform snapshot · 2026-08-29

13.4Mproviders & companiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities on file
26.2Msource-linked factsSource-linked field facts in the dated platform snapshot
90sources with dataDistinct snapshot source IDs with at least one positive record count
19fresh sourcesDistinct source IDs whose latest positive-data snapshot falls within the preceding 45 days
111sources integratedActive registry rows; integration does not establish a load
13state Medicaid jurisdictionsDistinct states represented in the state-exclusions serving table

Integrated, with-data, and fresh-observation counts are separate. No platform-wide source-completeness count is published. Completeness is source-specific and must be evaluated against the named source's expected scope. State coverage is a separate jurisdiction measure.

Source authority is record-specific

Use the issuer named on the record.

Fonteum spans federal, state, and global public publishers. A source page or returned record identifies its issuer and dataset where that metadata is available. A platform registry count does not assign every page to one authority or establish loaded, fresh, or complete coverage.

Browse source records and their stated limitations →

Reproducible by design

Inspect the evidence each published figure actually supplies.

Source and date

Research pages expose the named public file and observation date where those fields are available. Source-file SHA-256 coverage is separate; facts do not currently link deterministically to signatures.

Available derivation

Studies with a retained release and committed derivation link the SQL or method used. Other studies state the evidence and reproduction limits they actually have.

Daily observations

Dated table row-count observations can detect local drift. They do not imply that an upstream publisher released or Fonteum ingested new data that day.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Request access