Skip to content
FonteumThe Graph

By use case

Exclusion & monitoring (self-serve)Free roster screen — no accountExclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & provider-data enrichmentAudit evidence & defensible programsProvider data for AI / RAGM&A & network diligence

By buyer

Compliance & riskJournalists & newsroomsDevelopers & AI teams

By industry

HealthcareProviders & facilitiesSanctionsOFAC / EU / UK / UN / OIG / SAMFederal contractingSAM · USASpending · FAPIIS

The capability layer

APIREST + bulk accessFor AI agentsModel Context Protocol serverFHIR R4 APIBulk exportAudit packSigned report artifacts; source facts remain separately citedReconciliationSource-vs-source diffsAI answers with sourcesHow records link upHistoryRetained versions for named sources

The differentiator

Coverage & sourcesThe catalogFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareFacility qualityAI answers, comparedBrowse all datasets →
Research

The dev on-ramp

DocsAPI referenceConnect your AI agent (MCP)One-paste installFHIR sandboxLive API surfaceQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrations
Pricing
Sign inFree roster screen →Get a signed certificate →

Solutions

Exclusion & monitoring (self-serve)Exclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & provider-data enrichmentAudit evidence & defensible programsProvider data for AI / RAGM&A & network diligenceCompliance & riskJournalists & newsroomsDevelopers & AI teamsHealthcareSanctionsFederal contracting

Platform

APIFor AI agentsFHIR R4 APIBulk exportAudit packReconciliationAI answers with sourcesHow records link upHistory

Data

Coverage & sourcesFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareAI answers, comparedBrowse all datasets →
Research

Developers

DocsAPI referenceConnect your AI agent (MCP)FHIR sandboxQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrations
Pricing
Sign inFree roster screen →Get a signed certificate →
Fonteum Care Compare · New Mexico

New Mexico ambulatory surgical centers: 19 Medicare-certified, ASC quality measures with NPI bridge.

Per-facility ASC-1 through ASC-12 quality measures with deterministic NPI bridge (100.0% NPI coverage in New Mexico) — the only Care Compare facility type with a usable provider-identity join key.

Cross-check at Medicare.gov →All states →
Snapshot May 7, 2026·19 Medicare-certified ASCs in New Mexico · 100.0% with NPI·CMS Care Compare — ASC Quality·Module overview →·Methodology →·Audit Pack →
Source-modified 2025-12-16 · Reporting year 2024 · ASC-12 hospital-visit follow-up rates suppressed for facilities below volume threshold

Editorial note: New Mexico is a state where source-cited public-data coverage of ASC quality is materially thinner than national averages — Fonteum prioritizes full provenance + state context here.

ASC-12 performance breakdown — New Mexico

ASC-12 measures hospital-visit rate within 7 days of outpatient surgery. CMS-published performance categories on facilities meeting the volume threshold.

N/A
16
No Different Than the National Rate
3

ASC-1 through ASC-11 quality measures — New Mexico state means

Each row is the mean CMS-published rate across New Mexicofacilities that meet the measure’s reporting threshold. Lower is better for adverse-event measures; higher is better for the prophylactic-antibiotic process measure. Facilities CMS suppressed for low case volume are excluded from the mean, not counted as zero.

MeasureDirectionState meanFacilities reporting
Patient burn rateLower is better0.00%11
Unplanned hospital transfer/admissionLower is better0.08%13
Wrong site, side, patient, or procedureLower is better0.01%11
All-cause hospital readmission rateLower is better0.05%16
Appropriate prophylactic antibiotic useHigher is better97.53%3

Highest-volume ASCs — New Mexico

Top 19 by ASC-12 reportable case volume (a procedural-volume signal, not a quality measure).

FacilityCityASC-12 casesCategory
Southwest endoscopy ltdALBUQUERQUE5228No Different Than the National Rate
The endoscopy center of santa feSANTA FE3405No Different Than the National Rate
Lohman endoscopy center llcLAS CRUCES2825No Different Than the National Rate
Desert peaks surgery centerLAS CRUCES—N/A
Presbyterian hospital ascALBUQUERQUE—N/A
Four corners ambulatory surgery center llcFARMINGTON—N/A
Pacific cataract and laser institute inc pcALBUQUERQUE—N/A
Albuquerque ambulatory eye surgery center llcALBUQUERQUE—N/A
Surgery center of sante feSANTA FE—N/A
Asc of the heart instituteLAS CRUCES—N/A
Presbyterian rust medical center asc llc dba new mexico surgery center multi specialtyRIO RANCHO—N/A
Fillmore eye clinic ascALAMOGORDO—N/A
Physician surgery center of albuquerque llcALBUQUERQUE—N/A
New mexico orthopaedic surgery center lp dba new mexico orthopaedic surgery centerALBUQUERQUE—N/A
Southern new mexico surgery centerALAMOGORDO—N/A
Mountainview surgery centerLAS CRUCES—N/A
Sandia surgery center llcALBUQUERQUE—N/A
Comprehensive surgical care of albuquerque llcALBUQUERQUE—N/A
High resort eye surgery center llcRIO RANCHO—N/A

New Mexico ambulatory surgical centers — FAQ

How many ambulatory surgical centers are Medicare-certified in New Mexico?
19 Medicare-certified ambulatory surgical centers operate in New Mexico as of the CMS Care Compare ASC Quality snapshot (2026-05-07). Every facility carries a National Provider Identifier — ASCs are the only Care Compare facility type with a 100% deterministic NPI bridge.
What ASC quality measures does New Mexico report?
CMS publishes ASC-1 through ASC-12. This page aggregates the state mean for the per-facility rate measures that have at least one reporting facility in New Mexico, plus the ASC-12 colonoscopy follow-up performance category. Measures are CMS-published rates: lower is better for adverse-event measures (burns, transfers, wrong-site events, readmissions, cataract complications) and higher is better for appropriate prophylactic antibiotic use.
Why are some facilities missing a quality rate?
CMS suppresses a measure when a facility falls below the minimum case volume for that measure in the reporting window. Suppressed facilities are excluded from each state mean rather than counted as zero, so the averages reflect only facilities CMS actually scored.
Where does this ASC data come from and how current is it?
The displayed fields come from the CMS Care Compare Ambulatory Surgical Center Quality file, source-modified 2025-12-16. Record-level provenance can be null; cross-check a consequential facility record at Medicare.gov.

Compare other facility types

Supported Care Compare facility responses for New Mexico and other states expose source-and-date fields where the module supplies them; individual fields may be absent or null.

Nursing homesHome healthHospiceDialysisHospitalsAll modules

Compliance posture

Methodology · Corrections log · Editorial policy

What’s on file, by the numbers

Platform snapshot · 2026-07-15

13.4Mproviders & companiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities on file
26.2Msource-linked factsSource-linked field facts in the dated platform snapshot
—sources liveCrosswalk-resolved sources with a proved content transition in the preceding 45 days
111sources integratedActive registry rows; integration does not establish a load
13state Medicaid jurisdictionsDistinct states represented in the state-exclusions serving table

Built on the authoritative federal record

The primary sources, named on every page.

These are the federal agencies whose public datasets Fonteum ingests and attributes — the issuing authorities, not customers or partners. Every figure on the site links back to one of them.

  • CMS
  • HHS-OIG
  • HRSA
  • FDA
  • NLM
  • NUCC
  • Census
  • BLS
  • BEA

See the full source registry, with license and refresh cadence for each →

Reproducible by design

Published figures name their source and date.

Source and date

Published research identifies its government file and observation date. Source-file SHA-256 coverage is disclosed separately; facts do not currently link deterministically to signatures.

Reproducible SQL

Each study ships the exact query behind its figures, run against the same dated copy of the federal file we used. Re-run it yourself.

Daily observations

The platform records table row counts daily. Those observations detect local drift; they do not imply that an upstream publisher released or Fonteum ingested new data that day.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Fonteum
Platform
Platform overviewAPIFor AI agents (MCP)FHIR R4 APIBulk exportAudit packReconciliationAI answers with sourcesHow records link upHistory
Solutions
All solutionsExclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & enrichmentAudit evidenceProvider data for AI / RAGUse casesM&A & network diligenceCompliance & riskJournalists & newsroomsDevelopers & AI teams
Data & sources
Coverage & sourcesBrowse all datasetsState Medicaid exclusionsFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareNursing homesRecall recordsSanctions screeningOIG LEIE listOwnershipStaffingDeficienciesSpecial Focus Facilities
Federal contracting
OverviewAwards during active exclusionFederal debarment scorecardProcurement questionsContractor lookup8(a) certification guide
Developers
Developer hubDocsAPI referenceQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrationsWebhooks
Research & guides
Research hubLearnHow it worksGuidesHealthcare provider dataExclusion & sanctions screeningProvider credentialing dataHealthcare data for AIHospital margin gapProvider access gapsGlossaryComparisonsSourced data vs plain LLM answersCitationsManifestoWhy Fonteum
Company
AboutPressCustomersPricingContactEditorial policyCorrections
Trust & legal
TrustTrust markQualitySecurityPrivacy policyTerms of serviceAPI termsMedical disclaimer

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

© 2026 Fonteum LLC. All rights reserved.

·hello@fonteum.com

A public-records graph that exposes source and observation metadata where supplied.

Fonteum's provenance ledger contained 26.2M source-linked facts on July 12, 2026. All but 14 carried a source-file SHA-256; 0 linked deterministically to a signature. Inspect a supplied snapshot id at fonteum.com/verify · source-mark coverage and limitations.
Request access→