Skip to content
FonteumThe Graph

By use case

Exclusion & monitoring (self-serve)Free roster screen — no accountExclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & provider-data enrichmentAudit evidence & defensible programsProvider data for AI / RAGM&A & network diligence

By buyer

Compliance & riskJournalists & newsroomsDevelopers & AI teams

By industry

HealthcareProviders & facilitiesSanctionsOFAC / EU / UK / UN / OIG / SAMFederal contractingSAM · USASpending · FAPIIS

The capability layer

APIREST + bulk accessFor AI agentsModel Context Protocol serverFHIR R4 APIBulk exportAudit packSigned report artifacts; source facts remain separately citedReconciliationSource-vs-source diffsAI answers with sourcesHow records link upHistoryRetained versions for named sources

The differentiator

Coverage & sourcesThe catalogFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareFacility qualityAI answers, comparedBrowse all datasets →
Research

The dev on-ramp

DocsAPI referenceConnect your AI agent (MCP)One-paste installFHIR sandboxLive API surfaceQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrations
Pricing
Sign inFree roster screen →Get a signed certificate →

Solutions

Exclusion & monitoring (self-serve)Exclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & provider-data enrichmentAudit evidence & defensible programsProvider data for AI / RAGM&A & network diligenceCompliance & riskJournalists & newsroomsDevelopers & AI teamsHealthcareSanctionsFederal contracting

Platform

APIFor AI agentsFHIR R4 APIBulk exportAudit packReconciliationAI answers with sourcesHow records link upHistory

Data

Coverage & sourcesFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareAI answers, comparedBrowse all datasets →
Research

Developers

DocsAPI referenceConnect your AI agent (MCP)FHIR sandboxQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrations
Pricing
Sign inFree roster screen →Get a signed certificate →
Fonteum Care Compare · Minnesota

Minnesota ambulatory surgical centers: 86 Medicare-certified, ASC quality measures with NPI bridge.

Per-facility ASC-1 through ASC-12 quality measures with deterministic NPI bridge (100.0% NPI coverage in Minnesota) — the only Care Compare facility type with a usable provider-identity join key.

Cross-check at Medicare.gov →All states →
Snapshot May 7, 2026·86 Medicare-certified ASCs in Minnesota · 100.0% with NPI·CMS Care Compare — ASC Quality·Module overview →·Methodology →·Audit Pack →
Source-modified 2025-12-16 · Reporting year 2024 · ASC-12 hospital-visit follow-up rates suppressed for facilities below volume threshold

ASC-12 performance breakdown — Minnesota

ASC-12 measures hospital-visit rate within 7 days of outpatient surgery. CMS-published performance categories on facilities meeting the volume threshold.

N/A
52
No Different Than the National Rate
29
Number of Cases Too Small
5

ASC-1 through ASC-11 quality measures — Minnesota state means

Each row is the mean CMS-published rate across Minnesotafacilities that meet the measure’s reporting threshold. Lower is better for adverse-event measures; higher is better for the prophylactic-antibiotic process measure. Facilities CMS suppressed for low case volume are excluded from the mean, not counted as zero.

MeasureDirectionState meanFacilities reporting
Patient burn rateLower is better0.00%69
Unplanned hospital transfer/admissionLower is better0.02%74
Wrong site, side, patient, or procedureLower is better0.00%70
All-cause hospital readmission rateLower is better0.12%79
Appropriate prophylactic antibiotic useHigher is better94.72%28

Highest-volume ASCs — Minnesota

Top 25 by ASC-12 reportable case volume (a procedural-volume signal, not a quality measure).

FacilityCityASC-12 casesCategory
Mngi endoscopy asc incCOON RAPIDS10626No Different Than the National Rate
Mngi endoscopy asc incPLYMOUTH10626No Different Than the National Rate
Mngi endoscopy asc incEAGAN10626No Different Than the National Rate
Mngi endoscopy asc incBLOOMINGTON10626No Different Than the National Rate
Mngi endoscopy asc incWOODBURY10626No Different Than the National Rate
Mngi endoscopy asc inc dba mngi endoscopy lakevilleLAKEVILLE10626No Different Than the National Rate
East metro endoscopy center llcST PAUL2831No Different Than the National Rate
Affiliated endoscopy centers dba mngi endoscopy maple groveMAPLE GROVE2831No Different Than the National Rate
Affiliated endoscopy centers llc dba mngi endoscopy vadnais heightsVADNAIS HEIGHTS2831No Different Than the National Rate
Mankato clinic endoscopy center llcMANKATO1192No Different Than the National Rate
Minnesota endoscopy center llcST PAUL941No Different Than the National Rate
Carris health llcWILLMAR824No Different Than the National Rate
Southhealth asc llc dba edina specialty surgery centerEDINA504No Different Than the National Rate
North memorial ambulatory surgery center at maple grove llcMAPLE GROVE483No Different Than the National Rate
M health fairviewSAINT PAUL444No Different Than the National Rate
M health fairviewST PAUL403No Different Than the National Rate
Sanford health detroit lakes same day surgery ctrDETROIT LAKES392No Different Than the National Rate
Bhatti gi surgery center llcCHASKA372No Different Than the National Rate
Westhealth surgery centerPLYMOUTH303No Different Than the National Rate
Centracare surgery center llcST CLOUD257No Different Than the National Rate
Healtheast surgery center maplewood llcMAPLEWOOD209No Different Than the National Rate
St cloud surgical centerST CLOUD180No Different Than the National Rate
Lakewalk surgery centerDULUTH177No Different Than the National Rate
Orseshoe surgery center llc dba lakewood surgery centerGRAND RAPIDS98No Different Than the National Rate
Northern lakes surgery center llcMOOSE LAKE76No Different Than the National Rate

Minnesota ambulatory surgical centers — FAQ

How many ambulatory surgical centers are Medicare-certified in Minnesota?
86 Medicare-certified ambulatory surgical centers operate in Minnesota as of the CMS Care Compare ASC Quality snapshot (2026-05-07). Every facility carries a National Provider Identifier — ASCs are the only Care Compare facility type with a 100% deterministic NPI bridge.
What ASC quality measures does Minnesota report?
CMS publishes ASC-1 through ASC-12. This page aggregates the state mean for the per-facility rate measures that have at least one reporting facility in Minnesota, plus the ASC-12 colonoscopy follow-up performance category. Measures are CMS-published rates: lower is better for adverse-event measures (burns, transfers, wrong-site events, readmissions, cataract complications) and higher is better for appropriate prophylactic antibiotic use.
Why are some facilities missing a quality rate?
CMS suppresses a measure when a facility falls below the minimum case volume for that measure in the reporting window. Suppressed facilities are excluded from each state mean rather than counted as zero, so the averages reflect only facilities CMS actually scored.
Where does this ASC data come from and how current is it?
The displayed fields come from the CMS Care Compare Ambulatory Surgical Center Quality file, source-modified 2025-12-16. Record-level provenance can be null; cross-check a consequential facility record at Medicare.gov.

Compare other facility types

Supported Care Compare facility responses for Minnesota and other states expose source-and-date fields where the module supplies them; individual fields may be absent or null.

Nursing homesHome healthHospiceDialysisHospitalsAll modules

Compliance posture

Methodology · Corrections log · Editorial policy

What’s on file, by the numbers

Platform snapshot · 2026-07-15

13.4Mproviders & companiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities on file
26.2Msource-linked factsSource-linked field facts in the dated platform snapshot
—sources liveCrosswalk-resolved sources with a proved content transition in the preceding 45 days
111sources integratedActive registry rows; integration does not establish a load
13state Medicaid jurisdictionsDistinct states represented in the state-exclusions serving table

Built on the authoritative federal record

The primary sources, named on every page.

These are the federal agencies whose public datasets Fonteum ingests and attributes — the issuing authorities, not customers or partners. Every figure on the site links back to one of them.

  • CMS
  • HHS-OIG
  • HRSA
  • FDA
  • NLM
  • NUCC
  • Census
  • BLS
  • BEA

See the full source registry, with license and refresh cadence for each →

Reproducible by design

Published figures name their source and date.

Source and date

Published research identifies its government file and observation date. Source-file SHA-256 coverage is disclosed separately; facts do not currently link deterministically to signatures.

Reproducible SQL

Each study ships the exact query behind its figures, run against the same dated copy of the federal file we used. Re-run it yourself.

Daily observations

The platform records table row counts daily. Those observations detect local drift; they do not imply that an upstream publisher released or Fonteum ingested new data that day.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Fonteum
Platform
Platform overviewAPIFor AI agents (MCP)FHIR R4 APIBulk exportAudit packReconciliationAI answers with sourcesHow records link upHistory
Solutions
All solutionsExclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & enrichmentAudit evidenceProvider data for AI / RAGUse casesM&A & network diligenceCompliance & riskJournalists & newsroomsDevelopers & AI teams
Data & sources
Coverage & sourcesBrowse all datasetsState Medicaid exclusionsFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareNursing homesRecall recordsSanctions screeningOIG LEIE listOwnershipStaffingDeficienciesSpecial Focus Facilities
Federal contracting
OverviewAwards during active exclusionFederal debarment scorecardProcurement questionsContractor lookup8(a) certification guide
Developers
Developer hubDocsAPI referenceQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrationsWebhooks
Research & guides
Research hubLearnHow it worksGuidesHealthcare provider dataExclusion & sanctions screeningProvider credentialing dataHealthcare data for AIHospital margin gapProvider access gapsGlossaryComparisonsSourced data vs plain LLM answersCitationsManifestoWhy Fonteum
Company
AboutPressCustomersPricingContactEditorial policyCorrections
Trust & legal
TrustTrust markQualitySecurityPrivacy policyTerms of serviceAPI termsMedical disclaimer

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

© 2026 Fonteum LLC. All rights reserved.

·hello@fonteum.com

A public-records graph that exposes source and observation metadata where supplied.

Fonteum's provenance ledger contained 26.2M source-linked facts on July 12, 2026. All but 14 carried a source-file SHA-256; 0 linked deterministically to a signature. Inspect a supplied snapshot id at fonteum.com/verify · source-mark coverage and limitations.
Request access→