Skip to content
FonteumPublic-records evidence

← All sources Care quality graph

CMS NH Penalties

CMS NH Penalties (sub-join of Deficiencies)

U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services · Tier-1 · research-only (never on individual profiles)

Research-only

Civil-money penalties + denial-of-payment records; $467,344,898 in fines in the July 12 production audit. Sub-join of NH Health Deficiencies via Survey Event ID. Data-only treatment — surfaces in audit-pack export only; no dedicated brand-hub page.

What Fonteum uses it for

How this source shows up on Fonteum.

Sub-join. Audit-pack export field for /deficiencies methodology-versioned customer exports.

What this source does NOT mean

Not a standalone surface. Joins to Deficiencies via Survey Event ID; absent that join, raw penalty rows lack the citation context needed to interpret them.

What this dataset answers

Research and data questions this source supports.

  • Surface a nursing home's penalty history — civil monetary penalty amounts, dates, and payment status — on Care Compare brand-hub pages.
  • Build an enforcement action leaderboard that identifies which states and chains have the highest cumulative CMPs over a 3-year window.
  • Cross-reference penalty data with ownership chains (from SNF All Owners) to identify whether private equity-owned facilities have higher penalty rates.
  • Support M&A diligence on nursing home targets by quantifying historical enforcement exposure before transaction close.
  • Power a policy study on the relationship between CMS deficiency citation severity and the probability and size of civil monetary penalties.

Dataset size: 16,832 rows; 6,919 facilities; 2,553 payment-denial records covering 1,950 facilities; $467,344,898 in positive fines

Fields used

Per-field display contract.

Fields listed below show their configured `display_allowed` flag from the §94 provenance schema. Fields marked write-locked are captured for audit and are not rendered on profile pages.

Research-only — never on profiles

5 fields
ccnCMS Certification Number
survey_event_idSurvey Event ID
penalty_typePenalty type
penalty_amount_usdPenalty amount (USD)
is_finalizedPenalty finalization flag
Limitations

What we can’t infer from this source.

  • Some penalty entries are placeholders pending administrative adjudication.
  • Finalization lag 3–6 months behind Deficiencies publication.
  • Data-only sub-join — does not have a dedicated brand-hub page; joins to /deficiencies via Survey Event ID.
Source metadata

Authority, license, publisher cadence.

Authority

U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services

Tier

Tier-1 · research-only (never on individual profiles)

Publisher / configured cadence

Declared or configured cadence: Quarterly (trails Deficiencies 3–6 months for finalized penalty amounts). Not evidence of the latest loaded source date.

License

U.S. government public-domain works (17 U.S.C. § 105). Attribution required: 'Source: CMS NH Penalties · Snapshot {YYYY-MM-DD}'. License ↗

Attribution requirement

Source: CMS NH Penalties · Snapshot {YYYY-MM-DD}

ToS & usage notes

What the source allows.

U.S. government public-domain works. PDC publishes the dataset at data.cms.gov with explicit redistribution rights.

Sample provenance

What a single field looks like in the graph.

This worked example shows the provenance shape used when a surfaced field has populated source, last-checked, display-rule, and confidence metadata. Individual fields may omit unavailable values.

Field

Per-event penalty row (audit-pack only)

Sample value

Civil money penalty · $58,400 · finalized 2025-10-04 · joined to Deficiency F689 G via Survey Event ID

Provenance line

Source: CMS NH Penalties · Snapshot {YYYY-MM-DD} · Display rule: audit-pack-only sub-join via Survey Event ID; no dedicated brand-hub page

How to access

Official API, bulk download, and Fonteum endpoints.

Frequently asked

Common questions about CMS NH Penalties.

What is the CMS Nursing Home Penalties dataset?
The loaded CMS Nursing Home Penalties file contains the enforcement rows present in that release, including Civil Monetary Penalties and payment-denial records. A row can include facility CCN, penalty type, amount, date imposed, and payment status; this is not a claim of every enforcement action.
What is a Civil Monetary Penalty (CMP) for a nursing home?
A Civil Monetary Penalty (CMP) is a financial sanction CMS imposes on nursing homes for certain deficiencies. Per-day CMPs accrue for each day specified by the enforcement action; per-instance CMPs apply to a discrete action. The April 2023–March 2026 production table spans 6,919 facilities across 16,832 rows, with $467,344,898 in positive fines. The median individual positive fine was $14,113. Separately, 2,553 payment-denial records cover 1,950 facilities.
What is the Fonteum Nursing Home Penalties enforcement study?
The April 2023–March 2026 production table spans 6,919 facilities across 16,832 rows, with $467,344,898 in positive fines. Separately, 2,553 payment-denial records cover 1,950 facilities. The median individual positive fine is $14,113; the median cumulative fine per fined facility is $34,272.
Where can I download the CMS nursing home penalties data?
CMS publishes the Nursing Home Penalties dataset at data.cms.gov/provider-data. The file is updated quarterly and is U.S. government public-domain data. The dataset joins to the Health Deficiencies file via Survey Event ID.
How does a nursing home contest or appeal a CMP?
A nursing home may contest a CMP by requesting an informal dispute resolution (IDR) within 10 business days of receiving the enforcement notice, or by requesting an administrative hearing before an Administrative Law Judge (ALJ) within 60 days. CMS reduces CMPs by 35% for facilities that waive the right to a hearing and pay promptly. Fonteum surfaces payment_status in the penalties dataset to distinguish settled from contested CMPs.
See also
  • /sources → The generated source-catalog subset — documented datasets Fonteum cites.
  • /data-provenance → The provider graph — pipeline diagram, source-family clusters, field-level provenance examples, display rules.
  • /methodology → Documented sourcing, publisher cadence, observed freshness, and corrections policy.
  • /editorial-policy → Independence, sourcing, conflicts, corrections, retractions.

What’s on file, by the numbers

Platform snapshot · 2026-08-11

13.4Mproviders & companiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities on file
26.2Msource-linked factsSource-linked field facts in the dated platform snapshot
90sources with dataDistinct snapshot source IDs with at least one positive record count
73fresh sourcesDistinct source IDs whose latest positive-data snapshot falls within the preceding 45 days
111sources integratedActive registry rows; integration does not establish a load
13state Medicaid jurisdictionsDistinct states represented in the state-exclusions serving table

Integrated, with-data, and fresh-observation counts are separate. No platform-wide source-completeness count is published. Completeness is source-specific and must be evaluated against the named source's expected scope. State coverage is a separate jurisdiction measure.

Source authority is record-specific

Use the issuer named on the record.

Fonteum spans federal, state, and global public publishers. A source page or returned record identifies its issuer and dataset where that metadata is available. A platform registry count does not assign every page to one authority or establish loaded, fresh, or complete coverage.

Browse source records and their stated limitations →

Reproducible by design

Inspect the evidence each published figure actually supplies.

Source and date

Research pages expose the named public file and observation date where those fields are available. Source-file SHA-256 coverage is separate; facts do not currently link deterministically to signatures.

Available derivation

Studies with a retained release and committed derivation link the SQL or method used. Other studies state the evidence and reproduction limits they actually have.

Daily observations

Dated table row-count observations can detect local drift. They do not imply that an upstream publisher released or Fonteum ingested new data that day.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Request access