Skip to content
FonteumPublic-records evidence

← All sources Research activity

ClinicalTrials.gov

ClinicalTrials.gov Studies

U.S. National Library of Medicine (ClinicalTrials.gov) · Tier-1 · research-only (never on individual profiles)

Research-only

ClinicalTrials.gov is the U.S. National Library of Medicine's registry of interventional and observational clinical studies. It records sponsors, principal investigators (overall officials), conditions, interventions, and study status. As of the 2026-06-14 snapshot, Fonteum holds 555,500 registered studies.

What Fonteum uses it for

How this source shows up on Fonteum.

Tier-1 research-only context for studies on research activity and key-opinion-leader networks. Fonteum surfaces study title, status, conditions, sponsor, and overall officials at the aggregate level. Records are name-keyed (PIs and sponsors by name / affiliation); there is no NPI in the source, and NPI / entity-graph linkage is deferred — ambiguous matches are held.

What this source does NOT mean

A ClinicalTrials.gov record describes a registered study — it does not measure provider quality, outcomes, or endorsement, and a named investigator is not a Fonteum-asserted identity match to any specific provider profile. Registration does not imply a result, an approval, or a Fonteum assessment.

What this dataset answers

Research and data questions this source supports.

  • Build a research dataset of registered clinical studies by condition, sponsor, or status with row-level provenance.
  • Analyze research-activity and key-opinion-leader networks at the aggregate, name-keyed level.
  • Track interventional and observational study volume by condition area over time.
  • Feed a retrieval system with structured study records (NCT id, title, status, sponsor) and source attribution attached.

Dataset size: 555,500 registered studies (2026-06-14 snapshot)

Fields used

Per-field display contract.

Fields listed below show their configured `display_allowed` flag from the §94 provenance schema. Fields marked write-locked are captured for audit and are not rendered on profile pages.

Research-only — never on profiles

5 fields
nct_idNCT registration number
titleStudy title
overall_statusOverall status
sponsorLead sponsor (by name)
overall_officialsOverall officials / PIs (by name)
Limitations

What we can’t infer from this source.

  • Tier-1 — aggregate research context only; never rendered on individual provider profiles.
  • Name-keyed: investigators and sponsors are recorded by name / affiliation. There is no NPI in the source.
  • NPI / entity-graph linkage is deferred; ambiguous name matches are held, not written.
  • Registration is self-reported by sponsors and may lag or omit results.
Source metadata

Authority, license, publisher cadence.

Authority

U.S. National Library of Medicine (ClinicalTrials.gov)

Tier

Tier-1 · research-only (never on individual profiles)

Publisher / configured cadence

Declared or configured cadence: Monthly — pulled from the ClinicalTrials.gov Data API v2. Not evidence of the latest loaded source date.

License

Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine. Public-domain federal data; free to use with attribution. License ↗

Attribution requirement

Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (ClinicalTrials.gov) · Snapshot {YYYY-MM-DD}

ToS & usage notes

What the source allows.

Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (ClinicalTrials.gov). The Data API v2 is key-less and public-domain; the only ask is the NLM courtesy attribution. Snapshot and attestation fields must be read from the specific artifact; no provenance fact currently links deterministically to a signature.

Sample provenance

What a single field looks like in the graph.

This worked example shows the provenance shape used when a surfaced field has populated source, last-checked, display-rule, and confidence metadata. Individual fields may omit unavailable values.

Field

Registered study (research-only)

Sample value

NCT00000000 · Recruiting · Lead sponsor: Example University

Provenance line

Source: ClinicalTrials.gov · Snapshot 2026-06-14 · Methodology clinicaltrials-gov/v1 · Display rule: name-keyed research context — never an asserted provider-identity match

How to access

Official API, bulk download, and Fonteum endpoints.

Frequently asked

Common questions about ClinicalTrials.gov.

What is ClinicalTrials.gov?
ClinicalTrials.gov is the U.S. National Library of Medicine's public registry of interventional and observational clinical studies conducted around the world. Each record carries an NCT registration number, study title, status, conditions, interventions, sponsor, and overall officials (principal investigators).
How does Fonteum source ClinicalTrials.gov data?
Fonteum pulls study-level records from the ClinicalTrials.gov Data API v2, which is key-less and public-domain. The loaded release date and any attestation must be inspected separately. As of the 2026-06-14 snapshot, Fonteum holds 555,500 registered studies.
Are study investigators linked to provider profiles?
No. ClinicalTrials.gov records are name-keyed — principal investigators and sponsors are recorded by name and affiliation, and there is no NPI in the source. NPI / entity-graph linkage is deferred; a named investigator is not a Fonteum-asserted identity match to any specific provider profile.
Does a registered study mean a result or an approval?
No. Registration records that a study exists — it does not imply a result, a regulatory approval, or a Fonteum assessment. Registration is self-reported by sponsors and may lag or omit results.
How can I cite this data?
Use the NLM courtesy attribution: 'Courtesy of the U.S. National Library of Medicine (ClinicalTrials.gov)'. The data is public-domain federal data; the only ask is that courtesy attribution.
Related

Related sources in the graph

See also
  • /sources → The generated source-catalog subset — documented datasets Fonteum cites.
  • /data-provenance → The provider graph — pipeline diagram, source-family clusters, field-level provenance examples, display rules.
  • /methodology → Documented sourcing, publisher cadence, observed freshness, and corrections policy.
  • /editorial-policy → Independence, sourcing, conflicts, corrections, retractions.

What’s on file, by the numbers

Platform snapshot · 2026-08-11

13.4Mproviders & companiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities on file
26.2Msource-linked factsSource-linked field facts in the dated platform snapshot
90sources with dataDistinct snapshot source IDs with at least one positive record count
73fresh sourcesDistinct source IDs whose latest positive-data snapshot falls within the preceding 45 days
111sources integratedActive registry rows; integration does not establish a load
13state Medicaid jurisdictionsDistinct states represented in the state-exclusions serving table

Integrated, with-data, and fresh-observation counts are separate. No platform-wide source-completeness count is published. Completeness is source-specific and must be evaluated against the named source's expected scope. State coverage is a separate jurisdiction measure.

Source authority is record-specific

Use the issuer named on the record.

Fonteum spans federal, state, and global public publishers. A source page or returned record identifies its issuer and dataset where that metadata is available. A platform registry count does not assign every page to one authority or establish loaded, fresh, or complete coverage.

Browse source records and their stated limitations →

Reproducible by design

Inspect the evidence each published figure actually supplies.

Source and date

Research pages expose the named public file and observation date where those fields are available. Source-file SHA-256 coverage is separate; facts do not currently link deterministically to signatures.

Available derivation

Studies with a retained release and committed derivation link the SQL or method used. Other studies state the evidence and reproduction limits they actually have.

Daily observations

Dated table row-count observations can detect local drift. They do not imply that an upstream publisher released or Fonteum ingested new data that day.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Request access