Skip to content
FonteumPublic-records evidence
ACCESS · ISSUE 081
hrsa-hpsaOriginal Research

Medically Underserved Areas: A Map Drawn Last Century

HRSA's map of America's medically underserved areas is old: of the 4,148 active MUA/MUP designations, 72.1% were made before 2000, the median dates to 1994, and 1,074 — one in four — share a single founding date in November 1978. A designation carries no expiration; it stays until withdrawn.

BY FONTEUM LLC · JUNE 16, 2026 · 9 MIN READREVIEWED BY DR. JENNIFER MONTECILLO, MDSNAPSHOT 2026-05-28 · LAST UPDATED MAY 28, 2026
HRSA HPSA · 2026-05-28
Active medically underserved designations by decade of designation, 2026hrsa-hpsa · 2026-05-28
1970s
1090
1980s
323
1990s
1578
2000s
613
2010s
387
2020s
157
Built on HRSA HPSA · snapshot 2026-05-28 · reproducible · re-derive the figures yourself
Key findings
of the 4,148 active Medically Underserved Area / Population designations were made before 2000 — 2,991 of them. The median active designation dates to May 1994, and only 7.8% were designated in the last ten years. An MUA/MUP carries no fixed expiration; it stays in effect until HRSA withdraws it
hrsa-hpsa · CMS
active designations — one in four (25.9%) — share a single designation date of November 1, 1978, the program's founding cohort. They have been designated for 47 years and 718 of them have no recorded update since the day they were designated
hrsa-hpsa · CMS
is the average Index of Medical Underservice across the 3,808 standard designations that carry a published score, on the 0-to-100 scale where 62.0 or below qualifies. 2,311 of them sit in the narrow 55-62 band just under the cutoff; the index is computed once at designation and not refreshed
hrsa-hpsa · CMS
active designations (140 areas and 76 populations) are Governor's Exceptions — designated despite not qualifying on the index, at a state governor's request. Among the 70 that carry a published score the average index is 72.0, above the 62.0 cutoff, exactly as the exception is built to allow
hrsa-hpsa · CMS
active designated MUA/MUP rows make up the current map — 3,567 area-based (86.0%) and 581 population-based — snapshot dated 2026-05-28; a further 673 are withdrawn and 82 proposed for withdrawal. Every figure is a count over published designations; no individual provider is named, ranked, or scored
hrsa-hpsa · CMS

HRSA keeps two separate maps of where America is short of health care. The better-known one is the Health Professional Shortage Area (HPSA) — a count of how thin the supply of primary-care, dental, or mental-health clinicians is in a given place. The other is older and quieter: the Medically Underserved Area / Population (MUA/MUP) map. An MUA/MUP is not about a single profession. It scores a whole service area, or a defined group of people, on the Index of Medical Underservice — primary-care physicians per 1,000 people, the infant mortality rate, the share of the population below poverty, and the share aged 65 and older, rolled into a single 0-to-100 number where 62.0 or below earns the designation. Read the active map and one fact dominates: it is, in large part, a record of decisions made decades ago.

Most of the active map predates 2000

Of the 4,148 currently designated MUA/MUP rows, 2,991 — 72.1% — were designated before the year 2000. The median active designation dates to May 1994, and only 7.8% were designated in the last ten years.

Decade of designationActive designationsShare of active map
1970s1,09026.3%
1980s3237.8%
1990s1,57838.0%
2000s61314.8%
2010s3879.3%
2020s1573.8%

Source: HRSA Medically Underserved Areas/Populations, active designations by decade of original designation, snapshot 2026-05-28.

The reason the map skews so far into the past is structural. An MUA/MUP designation carries no fixed expiration. Unlike many HPSA designations, which are reviewed on a cycle and can lapse, a medically underserved designation stays in effect until HRSA actively withdraws it. Designations therefore accumulate rather than turn over: a 1994 cohort and a 1978 cohort both sit on today's list alongside the handful added last year. The active map is less a current measurement than a ledger of every area added and not yet removed.

A medically underserved designation is a workforce-policy instrument, not a live measurement. Most of today's designations were made decades ago, on an index computed once and never refreshed — the map records when an area was added, not necessarily the conditions there now.

The persistence shows up in the update dates too. 3,030 of the 4,148 active designations — 73.0% — carry a last-update date identical to their original designation date, meaning the published file records no change to them since the day they were designated. The median last-update date, 1994-06-03, sits within weeks of the median designation date.

A quarter of the map was designated on one day in 1978

A single designation date — November 1, 1978 — accounts for 1,074 of the 4,148 active designations, 25.9% of the entire active map. One in four of today's medically underserved areas was designated on one day, 47 years ago, and is still in effect.

Designation dateActive designationsShare of active map
1978-11-011,07425.9%
1994-05-113097.4%
1994-05-122856.9%
1994-05-04581.4%
1994-04-12441.1%
1994-05-09340.8%

Source: HRSA Medically Underserved Areas/Populations, the six most common designation dates among active designations, snapshot 2026-05-28.

The November 1978 date is the program's founding cohort — the bulk of the original MUA designations made in its early implementation, after the designation framework was set in the late 1970s. Of those 1,074 designations, 718 have no recorded update since 1978-11-01. The next-largest dates are a cluster of mass re-designation events in spring 1994. After those two episodes the list is a long, thin tail: outside 1978 and 1994, no single date adds more than a few dozen areas. The shape of the map is set by a small number of large administrative events, decades apart, not by steady annual re-measurement.

The index behind the designation is a 1990s number

Standard designations ordinarily rely on an Index of Medical Underservice, but the published file does not carry a score for every active row. Across the 3,808 of 3,932 standard designations that carry a published index, the average is 54.8, comfortably under the 62.0 qualifying cutoff. But the distribution bunches right at the line.

Index of Medical UnderserviceStandard designations
40 or below (deepest need)166
40–50546
50–55777
55–62 (just under the cutoff)2,311
above 62 (grandfathered)8

Source: HRSA Medically Underserved Areas/Populations, standard designations with a published index, snapshot 2026-05-28. The denominator is 4,148 active designations minus the 216 Governor's Exceptions and 124 scoreless standard rows: 3,808. Of the 216 exceptions, 146 are scoreless; together with the 124 scoreless standard rows, that makes 270 missing scores overall.

2,311 of the 3,808 scored standard designations — 60.7% — sit in the narrow 55-to-62 band just under the qualifying cutoff. That clustering is what you would expect of a threshold program: areas are added when they cross the line, so the population of designations piles up just inside it. The important caveat is temporal. The index is computed once, at the time of designation, and is not automatically refreshed. For a map whose median designation is 1994, the typical index value is therefore a mid-1990s measurement of a place's primary-care access — not a reading of how that place looks today. A further 270 active designations carry no published index at all — 124 standard designations and 146 Governor's Exceptions — nearly all designated before 2010. The 146 scoreless exceptions are part of the 216-exception group, not an additional population.

The Governor's Exception: designated without qualifying

Not every designation cleared the index. 216 active designations — 140 areas and 76 populations — are Governor's Exceptions: designated despite not qualifying on the formula, at a state governor's request. HRSA's rules let a governor petition for a designation when unusual local conditions are not captured by the standard score.

GroupActive designationsWith published indexAverage index
Standard designations3,9323,80854.8
Governor's Exceptions2167072.0

Source: HRSA Medically Underserved Areas/Populations, standard vs Governor's Exception designations, snapshot 2026-05-28.

The exception group behaves exactly as the rule intends. Among the 70 Governor's Exception designations that carry a published score, the average index is 72.0 — above the 62.0 cutoff — confirming that these are areas the standard formula would have turned away. They make up a small share of the map, 5.2%, but they are the clearest illustration that the MUA/MUP list is a policy instrument with discretionary entry points, not a mechanical readout of a single threshold.

Where the map is, and how old each state's is

California (213) and Texas (212) hold the most active designations, followed by Illinois (176) and Georgia (168). But the age of the map varies sharply by state.

StateActive designationsMedian designation dateShare pre-2000
California2131994-08-0169.5%
Texas2121984-07-0365.1%
Illinois1761994-05-1872.2%
Georgia1681978-11-0182.7%
Pennsylvania1561994-05-1282.7%
Ohio1371994-05-1279.6%
New York1321994-05-0482.6%
Florida1292001-09-2630.2%

Source: HRSA Medically Underserved Areas/Populations, the eight states with the most active designations, snapshot 2026-05-28.

North Carolina and Georgia run a median designation date of 1978 — 95.6% of North Carolina's active designations and 82.7% of Georgia's predate 2000 — making their medically underserved maps almost entirely a 20th-century artifact. Florida is the outlier in the other direction: its median designation dates to 2001 and only 30.2% predate 2000, the mark of a state whose map has been refreshed and added to far more recently. The contrast is not about which state is more underserved; it is about when each state's designations were last established. The active map is 86.0% area-based (MUA) and 14.0% population-based (MUP), a split that holds broadly across states.

What one row actually is

Each row in the MUA/MUP file is one designation: a designation type (area or population, standard or Governor's Exception), an Index of Medical Underservice score, a designation date and last-update date, a status (designated, withdrawn, or proposed for withdrawal), and the state, county, and rural status of the service area. This study reads the active rows — those with status Designated, 4,148 of the 4,903 MUA/MUP rows in the file — and counting and grouping them is the entire method. The designation is about a place or a population, not a clinician: it carries no NPI, links to no provider, and renders on no individual profile. Every figure in this study is a count or percentage at the designation, date, index-band, or state level. No provider is named, ranked, or scored.

Methodology

All figures are direct aggregations over the hrsa_shortage_areas table, filtered to designation_kind = 'mua_mup', populated from HRSA's Medically Underserved Areas/Populations public file published through data.hrsa.gov. The table holds 4,903 MUA/MUP rows4,148 with status Designated (the active map), 673 withdrawn, and 82 proposed for withdrawal; snapshot last_update_date max 2026-05-28; public, read-only; license US-Government-Works. The study reads the active designations as the current map.

Decade and pre-2000 figures use designation_date, the date a designation was originally established. Index figures use the published score (the Index of Medical Underservice). Of the 4,148 active designations, 216 are Governor's Exceptions. The 3,932 standard rows split into 3,808 with a published score and 124 without one; another 146 exception rows are scoreless, producing 270 missing scores overall. We read score = 0 as no index published — nearly all of those rows were designated before 2010 — and exclude it from index averages, never treating a missing score as a literal zero. The standard-vs-exception split keys on whether designation_type contains "Exception." Because these are counts and ratios over a published file, every figure is exact as of the snapshot rather than estimated. Methodology version: hrsa-mua-mup/v1. The source-provenance contract is documented in the provenance methodology.

Limitations

  • A workforce-policy instrument, not a quality or conduct signal. A designation describes access to care across an area or a population. It is unrelated to the quality, conduct, or standing of any clinician practicing there, and this study draws no inference about any provider.
  • Aggregate and area-level only. Every figure is a count or percentage at the designation, date, index-band, or state level. No individual is named, ranked, or scored, and an MUA/MUP designation carries no NPI, so it renders on no provider profile.
  • Designation age is not current need. The Index of Medical Underservice is computed once at designation and is not automatically refreshed. An old designation records when an area was added and on what score — not whether conditions there have since improved or worsened. The study reports the age of the map, not a re-measurement of underservice.
  • Designations do not expire on their own. Because a designation stays in effect until HRSA withdraws it, the active list is cumulative. Counts of past designation years describe areas still on the map, not the full historical flow of designations ever made.
  • Missing index values. 270 active designations carry no published index: 124 standard rows and 146 of the 216 Governor's Exceptions. They are excluded from index averages; their designation dates and locations remain in every other count.
  • Snapshot, not a trend model. Figures reflect the single file dated 2026-05-28. HRSA revises the list over time, so counts shift between releases; this study does not model change over time.

Sources

The companion dataset page for HRSA shortage and underserved areas lists the full schema and refresh cadence, and the shortage-area data explorer exposes the underlying records. This is the medically-underserved counterpart to the rural skew of America's shortage areas and to the finding that most shortage areas are a single facility, not a community; for the safety-net clinics that serve many of these places see the coverage mix at America's community health centers, and for the supply side of the same access question, where Medicare providers cluster thickest and how the shape of Medicare enrollment is changing.

Frequently asked questions

What is a Medically Underserved Area or Population?
A Medically Underserved Area (MUA) or Population (MUP) is a federal designation HRSA assigns to a geographic area or a specific population group that has too little access to primary care. It is scored on the Index of Medical Underservice, which combines primary-care physicians per 1,000 people, the infant mortality rate, the share of the population below poverty, and the share aged 65 and older. An area qualifies at an index of 62.0 or below.
How is an MUA/MUP different from a Health Professional Shortage Area (HPSA)?
They are separate programs with separate rules. A HPSA measures the supply of a particular kind of clinician — primary care, dental, or mental health — and many HPSA designations are reviewed and can lapse. An MUA/MUP measures broader primary-care access through the Index of Medical Underservice, applies to areas and populations rather than disciplines, and carries no fixed expiration: it stays in effect until HRSA actively withdraws it. This study is about the MUA/MUP map specifically.
Why are so many designations from the 1970s and 1990s?
Because MUA/MUP designations do not expire. Once an area is designated it remains on the active list until HRSA withdraws it, so designations accumulate rather than turning over. The single largest cohort — 1,074 active designations, one in four — was made on November 1, 1978, in the program's early implementation, and is still in effect today. The median active designation dates to May 1994.
Does an old designation mean the area is no longer underserved?
Not necessarily, and this study makes no such claim. The Index of Medical Underservice is computed once at the time of designation and is not automatically refreshed, so the data records when an area was added to the map and on what score — not whether conditions there have improved or worsened since. An old designation may still reflect real need; it simply has not been re-measured in the published file.
What is a Governor's Exception designation?
It is a designation made even though the area did not qualify on the Index of Medical Underservice. Under HRSA's rules a state governor can request a designation based on unusual local conditions that the standard formula does not capture. There are 216 active Governor's Exception designations — 140 areas and 76 populations — and among the 70 that carry a published score the average index is 72.0, above the 62.0 qualifying cutoff, which is exactly the situation the exception exists to handle.
Which states have the most medically underserved designations?
California (213) and Texas (212) have the most active designations, followed by Illinois (176) and Georgia (168). The age of the map varies sharply by state: North Carolina and Georgia both run a median designation date of 1978 — 95.6% of North Carolina's and 82.7% of Georgia's designations predate 2000 — while Florida is the outlier with a median of 2001 and only 30.2% predating 2000.
Is a designation a judgment about the providers in that area?
No. A Medically Underserved Area or Population designation is a workforce-policy instrument about access to care across a place or a group of people. It says nothing about the quality, conduct, or standing of any clinician who practices there, and this study names, ranks, and scores no individual provider. Every figure is a count over published designations.
Can I reproduce these figures?
Yes. Every number is a direct count over the public hrsa_shortage_areas table, filtered to MUA/MUP rows, snapshot dated 2026-05-28 — with no modeling. The exact SQL for the decade distribution, the 1978 cohort, the Index of Medical Underservice bands, the Governor's Exception split, and the state breakdown is published in the reproducibility block below.

Who uses this data

The source data behind this study is public

Compliance teams, journalists, and researchers work from the same federal source families cited above — queried by NPI or facility identifier through Fonteum’s open dataset pages and API. Every figure traces to a frozen, downloadable snapshot you can reproduce yourself.

Datasets used

Reproducibility

Every claim, reproducible

The SQL
medically-underserved-areas-designation-age-2026.sql
-- America's Medically Underserved Areas and Populations (MUA/MUP) are an old
-- map: most of the active designations were made last century and have never
-- been updated since. Fully reproducible query.
--
-- Question: HRSA's Medically Underserved Area / Population (MUA/MUP) program is
-- a SEPARATE designation system from the Health Professional Shortage Area
-- (HPSA) program. An MUA/MUP is scored once on the Index of Medical Underservice
-- (IMU) — a 0-to-100 scale combining primary-care physicians per 1,000 people,
-- the infant mortality rate, the share of population below poverty, and the
-- share age 65 and older — and a service area qualifies at an IMU of 62.0 or
-- below. Unlike many HPSA designations, an MUA/MUP carries NO fixed expiration:
-- it stays in effect until HRSA actively withdraws it. So how old is the active
-- map, and how current is the index behind it?
--
-- The lead figure: of the 4,148 currently DESIGNATED MUA/MUP rows, 2,991 (72.1%)
-- were designated before 2000, the median designation dates to May 1994, and
-- 1,074 of them — one in four — share a single founding-cohort date of
-- 1978-11-01. A designation is a workforce-policy instrument, NOT a quality,
-- fraud, or wrongdoing signal of any kind, and names no individual provider.
--
-- Source:
--   public.hrsa_shortage_areas, rows WHERE designation_kind = 'mua_mup' — HRSA's
--     Medically Underserved Areas/Populations file, published via data.hrsa.gov.
--     4,903 MUA/MUP rows; snapshot last_update_date max 2026-05-28. Public,
--     read-only. License: US-Government-Works (17 U.S.C. Sec. 105).
--     methodology_version = 'hrsa-mua-mup/v1'.
--
-- Universe: this study reads the ACTIVE designations — status = 'Designated'
--   (4,148 rows) — the current MUA/MUP map. Withdrawn (673) and proposed-for-
--   withdrawal (82) rows are reconciled in query (1) but excluded from the
--   active-map figures. The same active-designation universe is used by the
--   companion HRSA shortage-area studies.
--
-- IMU note: the published IMU is stored in `score`. 270 active designations
--   carry score = 0, which we read as "no IMU published" (nearly all are pre-2010
--   designations) and EXCLUDE from IMU averages — we never treat a missing score
--   as a literal zero. A higher IMU means LESS underservice; 62.0 is the cutoff.

-- ============================================================================
-- (1) Universe reconciliation — the MUA/MUP file at a glance.
-- ============================================================================
-- audit-claim: universe
SELECT
  count(*)                                                          AS mua_mup_rows,
  count(*) FILTER (WHERE status = 'Designated')                     AS designated,
  count(*) FILTER (WHERE status = 'Withdrawn')                      AS withdrawn,
  count(*) FILTER (WHERE status = 'Proposed For Withdrawal')        AS proposed_withdrawal,
  min(designation_date)                                            AS earliest_designation,
  max(designation_date)                                            AS latest_designation,
  max(last_update_date)                                            AS snapshot
FROM public.hrsa_shortage_areas
WHERE designation_kind = 'mua_mup';
--  mua_mup_rows 4,903 · designated 4,148 · withdrawn 673 · proposed_withdrawal 82
--  earliest_designation 1977-03-11 · latest_designation 2026-05-28 · snapshot 2026-05-28

-- ============================================================================
-- (2) HEADLINE: how OLD the active map is. Decade of designation, plus the
--     share predating 2000 and the share from the last decade. 72.1% predate
--     2000; the median active designation dates to 1994-05-11; only 7.8% were
--     designated in the last ten years.
-- ============================================================================
-- audit-claim: decade-vector
WITH d AS (
  SELECT * FROM public.hrsa_shortage_areas
  WHERE designation_kind = 'mua_mup' AND status = 'Designated'
)
SELECT
  (floor(extract(year FROM designation_date) / 10) * 10)::int || 's'  AS decade,
  count(*)                                                          AS designations,
  round(100.0 * count(*) / sum(count(*)) OVER (), 1)                AS pct_of_active
FROM d
GROUP BY decade
ORDER BY decade;
--  1970s  1,090  26.3%
--  1980s    323   7.8%
--  1990s  1,578  38.0%
--  2000s    613  14.8%
--  2010s    387   9.3%
--  2020s    157   3.8%
--
-- Summary figures over the same active set (4,148 rows):
--   designated before 2000-01-01 ............... 2,991 (72.1%)
--   designated 2016-01-01 onward (last decade) ...  324 ( 7.8%)
--   median designation_date .................... 1994-05-11
--   designations whose last_update_date equals
--     their original designation_date .......... 3,030 (73.0% — no recorded change since)
--   median last_update_date .................... 1994-06-03

-- Direct summary outputs used by the narrative and founding-cohort claims.
-- audit-claim: age-and-update-summary
SELECT
  count(*) FILTER (WHERE designation_date < DATE '2000-01-01') AS pre_2000,
  round(100.0 * count(*) FILTER (WHERE designation_date < DATE '2000-01-01') / count(*), 1) AS pre_2000_pct,
  percentile_disc(0.5) WITHIN GROUP (ORDER BY designation_date) AS median_designation_date,
  count(*) FILTER (WHERE designation_date >= DATE '2016-01-01') AS designated_since_2016,
  round(100.0 * count(*) FILTER (WHERE designation_date >= DATE '2016-01-01') / count(*), 1) AS designated_since_2016_pct,
  count(*) FILTER (WHERE last_update_date = designation_date) AS never_updated,
  round(100.0 * count(*) FILTER (WHERE last_update_date = designation_date) / count(*), 1) AS never_updated_pct,
  percentile_disc(0.5) WITHIN GROUP (ORDER BY last_update_date) AS median_last_update_date,
  count(*) FILTER (
    WHERE designation_date = DATE '1978-11-01'
      AND last_update_date = designation_date
  ) AS founding_cohort_never_updated
FROM public.hrsa_shortage_areas
WHERE designation_kind = 'mua_mup' AND status = 'Designated';
-- pre_2000 2,991 (72.1%) · median designation 1994-05-11
-- since 2016 324 (7.8%) · unchanged 3,030 (73.0%)
-- median last update 1994-06-03 · founding-cohort unchanged 718

-- ============================================================================
-- (3) The 1978 founding cohort. A single designation date — November 1, 1978 —
--     accounts for 1,074 of the 4,148 active designations (25.9%): one in four
--     of today's medically underserved areas was designated on one day, 47 years
--     ago, and is still in effect. 718 of those 1,074 have never been updated since.
-- ============================================================================
-- audit-claim: top-designation-dates
WITH d AS (
  SELECT * FROM public.hrsa_shortage_areas
  WHERE designation_kind = 'mua_mup' AND status = 'Designated'
)
SELECT
  designation_date,
  count(*)                                                          AS designations,
  round(100.0 * count(*) / sum(count(*)) OVER (), 1)                AS pct_of_active
FROM d
GROUP BY designation_date
ORDER BY designations DESC
LIMIT 6;
--  1978-11-01  1,074  25.9%   <- the founding cohort, still designated
--  1994-05-11    309   7.4%
--  1994-05-12    285   6.9%
--  1994-05-04     58   1.4%
--  1994-04-12     44   1.1%
--  1994-05-09     34   0.8%

-- ============================================================================
-- (4) The Index of Medical Underservice behind the active map. Among the 3,808
--     standard (non-exception) designations that carry a published IMU, the
--     average is 54.8 on the 0-to-100 scale where 62.0 or below qualifies; 2,311
--     of them sit in the narrow 55-62 band just under the cutoff. The IMU is
--     computed once at designation and is not refreshed, so for a file whose
--     median designation is 1994 these are largely 1990s index values. Of 270
--     active designations with no published IMU, 124 are standard rows and 146
--     are among the 216 Governor's Exceptions; those populations overlap.
-- ============================================================================
-- audit-claim: imu-band-vector
WITH active AS (
  SELECT * FROM public.hrsa_shortage_areas
  WHERE designation_kind = 'mua_mup' AND status = 'Designated'
)
SELECT
  count(*) FILTER (
    WHERE designation_type NOT LIKE '%Exception%' AND score > 0
  )                                                                  AS scored_standard,
  round(avg(score) FILTER (
    WHERE designation_type NOT LIKE '%Exception%' AND score > 0
  ), 1)                                                              AS mean_imu,
  count(*) FILTER (
    WHERE designation_type NOT LIKE '%Exception%' AND score > 0 AND score <= 40
  )                                                                  AS band_le_40,
  count(*) FILTER (
    WHERE designation_type NOT LIKE '%Exception%' AND score > 40 AND score <= 50
  )                                                                  AS band_40_50,
  count(*) FILTER (
    WHERE designation_type NOT LIKE '%Exception%' AND score > 50 AND score <= 55
  )                                                                  AS band_50_55,
  count(*) FILTER (
    WHERE designation_type NOT LIKE '%Exception%' AND score > 55 AND score <= 62
  )                                                                  AS band_55_62,
  count(*) FILTER (
    WHERE designation_type NOT LIKE '%Exception%' AND score > 62
  )                                                                  AS band_gt_62,
  round(100.0 * count(*) FILTER (
    WHERE designation_type NOT LIKE '%Exception%' AND score > 55 AND score <= 62
  ) / count(*) FILTER (
    WHERE designation_type NOT LIKE '%Exception%' AND score > 0
  ), 1)                                                              AS band_55_62_pct,
  count(*) FILTER (
    WHERE designation_type LIKE '%Exception%' AND score > 0
  )                                                                  AS scored_exception,
  count(*) FILTER (
    WHERE designation_type LIKE '%Exception%'
  )                                                                  AS exception_designations,
  count(*) FILTER (
    WHERE designation_type NOT LIKE '%Exception%' AND coalesce(score, 0) <= 0
  )                                                                  AS standard_missing_imu,
  count(*) FILTER (
    WHERE designation_type LIKE '%Exception%' AND coalesce(score, 0) <= 0
  )                                                                  AS exception_missing_imu,
  count(*) FILTER (WHERE coalesce(score, 0) <= 0)                    AS missing_imu,
  count(*)                                                           AS active_designations
FROM active;
--  a. IMU <= 40 (deepest need) ......  166
--  b. IMU 40-50 .....................  546
--  c. IMU 50-55 .....................  777
--  d. IMU 55-62 (just under cutoff) . 2,311   <- 60.7% of scored standard designations
--  e. IMU > 62 (above cutoff) .......    8
--  (mean IMU across these 3,808 scored standard designations = 54.8; range 18.1-74.7.)
--  reconciliation: 4,148 active - 216 exceptions - 124 scoreless standard = 3,808
--  missing IMU: 124 standard + 146 exception = 270; the 146 sit within the 216 exceptions.

-- ============================================================================
-- (5) The Governor's Exception. 216 active designations (140 areas + 76
--     populations) were made despite not qualifying on the index — at a state
--     governor's request under HRSA's exception process. Among the 70 of them
--     that carry a published IMU, the average is 72.0, above the 62.0 cutoff,
--     exactly as the exception is designed to allow.
-- ============================================================================
-- audit-claim: exception-vector
WITH d AS (
  SELECT
    (designation_type LIKE '%Exception%')                          AS is_governors_exception,
    score
  FROM public.hrsa_shortage_areas
  WHERE designation_kind = 'mua_mup' AND status = 'Designated'
)
SELECT
  is_governors_exception,
  count(*)                                                          AS designations,
  count(*) FILTER (WHERE score > 0)                                 AS with_published_imu,
  round(avg(score) FILTER (WHERE score > 0), 1)                     AS avg_imu_scored,
  round(100.0 * count(*) / sum(count(*)) OVER (), 1)                AS exception_pct_of_active
FROM d
GROUP BY is_governors_exception
ORDER BY is_governors_exception;
--  standard           3,932 · 3,808 scored · avg IMU 54.8
--  governors_exception  216 ·    70 scored · avg IMU 72.0  (above the 62.0 cutoff)

-- ============================================================================
-- (6) WHERE the active designations are, and how old each state's map is. Top
--     12 states by count, with each state's median designation date and the
--     share predating 2000. California and Texas lead by count, but North
--     Carolina and Georgia run a median date of 1978; Florida is the outlier
--     with a 2001 median and only 30.2% predating 2000.
-- ============================================================================
-- audit-claim: state-vector
WITH d AS (
  SELECT * FROM public.hrsa_shortage_areas
  WHERE designation_kind = 'mua_mup' AND status = 'Designated' AND state IS NOT NULL
)
SELECT
  state,
  count(*)                                                          AS designations,
  percentile_disc(0.5) WITHIN GROUP (ORDER BY designation_date)     AS median_designation_date,
  round(100.0 * count(*) FILTER (WHERE designation_date < '2000-01-01') / count(*), 1) AS pct_pre_2000
FROM d
GROUP BY state
ORDER BY designations DESC
LIMIT 12;
--  CA 213  median 1994-08-01  69.5% pre-2000
--  TX 212  median 1984-07-03  65.1%
--  IL 176  median 1994-05-18  72.2%
--  GA 168  median 1978-11-01  82.7%
--  PA 156  median 1994-05-12  82.7%
--  OH 137  median 1994-05-12  79.6%
--  NY 132  median 1994-05-04  82.6%
--  FL 129  median 2001-09-26  30.2%   <- the outlier: a refreshed map
--  MO 123  median 1992-08-04  94.3%
--  MI 115  median 1994-05-27  67.8%
--  NC 113  median 1978-11-01  95.6%
--  KY 112  median 1990-11-23  67.0%

-- Direct North Carolina values used outside the public top-eight table.
-- audit-claim: north-carolina-age
SELECT
  count(*)                                                           AS north_carolina_designations,
  percentile_disc(0.5) WITHIN GROUP (ORDER BY designation_date)      AS median_designation_date,
  round(100.0 * count(*) FILTER (WHERE designation_date < DATE '2000-01-01') / count(*), 1)
                                                                     AS pre_2000_pct
FROM public.hrsa_shortage_areas
WHERE designation_kind = 'mua_mup'
  AND status = 'Designated'
  AND state = 'NC';
-- North Carolina 113 · median 1978-11-01 · 95.6% pre-2000

-- ============================================================================
-- (7) Structure: areas vs populations, and the exception split. 86.0% of the
--     active map is area-based (MUA), 14.0% population-based (MUP).
-- ============================================================================
-- audit-claim: designation-type-vector
SELECT
  count(*) FILTER (WHERE designation_type LIKE 'Medically Underserved Area%')
                                                                     AS area_based,
  round(100.0 * count(*) FILTER (
    WHERE designation_type LIKE 'Medically Underserved Area%'
  ) / count(*), 1)                                                   AS area_based_pct,
  count(*) FILTER (WHERE designation_type LIKE 'Medically Underserved Population%')
                                                                     AS population_based,
  round(100.0 * count(*) FILTER (
    WHERE designation_type LIKE 'Medically Underserved Population%'
  ) / count(*), 1)                                                   AS population_based_pct
FROM public.hrsa_shortage_areas
WHERE designation_kind = 'mua_mup' AND status = 'Designated';
-- area-based 3,567 (86.0%) · population-based 581 (14.0%)
The snapshot
dataset_idhrsa-hpsa
snapshot_date2026-05-28
slsa_provenance_urlpending - publishes with the SLSA provenance generator (not yet live)
The JOINs
universe: hrsa_shortage_areas WHERE designation_kind = 'mua_mup'                  -- 4,903 rows; 4,148 status='Designated' (active); 673 withdrawn; 82 proposed
decade of designation = floor(year(designation_date)/10)*10                       -- pre-2000 = 2,991 (72.1%); last 10 yr = 324 (7.8%); median 1994-05-11
founding cohort = designation_date = '1978-11-01'                                 -- 1,074 rows (25.9%); 718 with last_update_date = designation_date
no recorded change = last_update_date = designation_date                          -- 3,030 of 4,148 (73.0%); median last_update 1994-06-03
IMU = score, standard designations only, score>0                                  -- 3,932 standard = 3,808 scored + 124 scoreless; mean 54.8; 2,311 in the 55-62 band
missing score reconciliation                                                       -- 270 total = 124 standard + 146 of the 216 Governor's Exceptions; exception rows are not subtracted twice
governors_exception = designation_type LIKE '%Exception%'                         -- 216 active (140 area + 76 population); 70 scored, mean IMU 72.0
structure: GROUP BY designation_type                                             -- area-based 3,567 (86.0%); population-based 581 (14.0%)
The pipeline version
git_sha8c06d24b
slsa_provenancepending - publishes with the SLSA provenance generator (not yet live)
methodology_versionhrsa-mua-mup/v1

Reproduce this

Run the exact query against the frozen 2026-05-28.

-- America's Medically Underserved Areas and Populations (MUA/MUP) are an old -- map: most of the active designations were made last century and have never -- been updated since. Fully reproducible query. -- -- Question: HRSA's Medically Underserved Area / Population (MUA/MUP) program is -- a SEPARATE designation system from the Health Professional Shortage Area -- (HPSA) program. An MUA/MUP is scored once on the Index of Medical Underservice -- (IMU) — a 0-to-100 scale combining primary-care physicians per 1,000 people, -- the infant mortality rate, the share of population below poverty, and the -- share age 65 and older — and a service area qualifies at an IMU of 62.0 or -- below. Unlike many HPSA designations, an MUA/MUP carries NO fixed expiration: -- it stays in effect until HRSA actively withdraws it. So how old is the active -- map, and how current is the index behind it? -- -- The lead figure: of the 4,148 currently DESIGNATED MUA/MUP rows, 2,991 (72.1%) -- were designated before 2000, the median designation dates to May 1994, and -- 1,074 of them — one in four — share a single founding-cohort date of -- 1978-11-01. A designation is a workforce-policy instrument, NOT a quality, -- fraud, or wrongdoing signal of any kind, and names no individual provider. -- -- Source: -- public.hrsa_shortage_areas, rows WHERE designation_kind = 'mua_mup' — HRSA's -- Medically Underserved Areas/Populations file, published via data.hrsa.gov. -- 4,903 MUA/MUP rows; snapshot last_update_date max 2026-05-28. Public, -- read-only. License: US-Government-Works (17 U.S.C. Sec. 105). -- methodology_version = 'hrsa-mua-mup/v1'. -- -- Universe: this study reads the ACTIVE designations — status = 'Designated' -- (4,148 rows) — the current MUA/MUP map. Withdrawn (673) and proposed-for- -- withdrawal (82) rows are reconciled in query (1) but excluded from the -- active-map figures. The same active-designation universe is used by the -- companion HRSA shortage-area studies. -- -- IMU note: the published IMU is stored in `score`. 270 active designations -- carry score = 0, which we read as "no IMU published" (nearly all are pre-2010 -- designations) and EXCLUDE from IMU averages — we never treat a missing score -- as a literal zero. A higher IMU means LESS underservice; 62.0 is the cutoff. -- ============================================================================ -- (1) Universe reconciliation — the MUA/MUP file at a glance. -- ============================================================================ -- audit-claim: universe SELECT count(*) AS mua_mup_rows, count(*) FILTER (WHERE status = 'Designated') AS designated, count(*) FILTER (WHERE status = 'Withdrawn') AS withdrawn, count(*) FILTER (WHERE status = 'Proposed For Withdrawal') AS proposed_withdrawal, min(designation_date) AS earliest_designation, max(designation_date) AS latest_designation, max(last_update_date) AS snapshot FROM public.hrsa_shortage_areas WHERE designation_kind = 'mua_mup'; -- mua_mup_rows 4,903 · designated 4,148 · withdrawn 673 · proposed_withdrawal 82 -- earliest_designation 1977-03-11 · latest_designation 2026-05-28 · snapshot 2026-05-28 -- ============================================================================ -- (2) HEADLINE: how OLD the active map is. Decade of designation, plus the -- share predating 2000 and the share from the last decade. 72.1% predate -- 2000; the median active designation dates to 1994-05-11; only 7.8% were -- designated in the last ten years. -- ============================================================================ -- audit-claim: decade-vector WITH d AS ( SELECT * FROM public.hrsa_shortage_areas WHERE designation_kind = 'mua_mup' AND status = 'Designated' ) SELECT (floor(extract(year FROM designation_date) / 10) * 10)::int || 's' AS decade, count(*) AS designations, round(100.0 * count(*) / sum(count(*)) OVER (), 1) AS pct_of_active FROM d GROUP BY decade ORDER BY decade; -- 1970s 1,090 26.3% -- 1980s 323 7.8% -- 1990s 1,578 38.0% -- 2000s 613 14.8% -- 2010s 387 9.3% -- 2020s 157 3.8% -- -- Summary figures over the same active set (4,148 rows): -- designated before 2000-01-01 ............... 2,991 (72.1%) -- designated 2016-01-01 onward (last decade) ... 324 ( 7.8%) -- median designation_date .................... 1994-05-11 -- designations whose last_update_date equals -- their original designation_date .......... 3,030 (73.0% — no recorded change since) -- median last_update_date .................... 1994-06-03 -- Direct summary outputs used by the narrative and founding-cohort claims. -- audit-claim: age-and-update-summary SELECT count(*) FILTER (WHERE designation_date < DATE '2000-01-01') AS pre_2000, round(100.0 * count(*) FILTER (WHERE designation_date < DATE '2000-01-01') / count(*), 1) AS pre_2000_pct, percentile_disc(0.5) WITHIN GROUP (ORDER BY designation_date) AS median_designation_date, count(*) FILTER (WHERE designation_date >= DATE '2016-01-01') AS designated_since_2016, round(100.0 * count(*) FILTER (WHERE designation_date >= DATE '2016-01-01') / count(*), 1) AS designated_since_2016_pct, count(*) FILTER (WHERE last_update_date = designation_date) AS never_updated, round(100.0 * count(*) FILTER (WHERE last_update_date = designation_date) / count(*), 1) AS never_updated_pct, percentile_disc(0.5) WITHIN GROUP (ORDER BY last_update_date) AS median_last_update_date, count(*) FILTER ( WHERE designation_date = DATE '1978-11-01' AND last_update_date = designation_date ) AS founding_cohort_never_updated FROM public.hrsa_shortage_areas WHERE designation_kind = 'mua_mup' AND status = 'Designated'; -- pre_2000 2,991 (72.1%) · median designation 1994-05-11 -- since 2016 324 (7.8%) · unchanged 3,030 (73.0%) -- median last update 1994-06-03 · founding-cohort unchanged 718 -- ============================================================================ -- (3) The 1978 founding cohort. A single designation date — November 1, 1978 — -- accounts for 1,074 of the 4,148 active designations (25.9%): one in four -- of today's medically underserved areas was designated on one day, 47 years -- ago, and is still in effect. 718 of those 1,074 have never been updated since. -- ============================================================================ -- audit-claim: top-designation-dates WITH d AS ( SELECT * FROM public.hrsa_shortage_areas WHERE designation_kind = 'mua_mup' AND status = 'Designated' ) SELECT designation_date, count(*) AS designations, round(100.0 * count(*) / sum(count(*)) OVER (), 1) AS pct_of_active FROM d GROUP BY designation_date ORDER BY designations DESC LIMIT 6; -- 1978-11-01 1,074 25.9% <- the founding cohort, still designated -- 1994-05-11 309 7.4% -- 1994-05-12 285 6.9% -- 1994-05-04 58 1.4% -- 1994-04-12 44 1.1% -- 1994-05-09 34 0.8% -- ============================================================================ -- (4) The Index of Medical Underservice behind the active map. Among the 3,808 -- standard (non-exception) designations that carry a published IMU, the -- average is 54.8 on the 0-to-100 scale where 62.0 or below qualifies; 2,311 -- of them sit in the narrow 55-62 band just under the cutoff. The IMU is -- computed once at designation and is not refreshed, so for a file whose -- median designation is 1994 these are largely 1990s index values. Of 270 -- active designations with no published IMU, 124 are standard rows and 146 -- are among the 216 Governor's Exceptions; those populations overlap. -- ============================================================================ -- audit-claim: imu-band-vector WITH active AS ( SELECT * FROM public.hrsa_shortage_areas WHERE designation_kind = 'mua_mup' AND status = 'Designated' ) SELECT count(*) FILTER ( WHERE designation_type NOT LIKE '%Exception%' AND score > 0 ) AS scored_standard, round(avg(score) FILTER ( WHERE designation_type NOT LIKE '%Exception%' AND score > 0 ), 1) AS mean_imu, count(*) FILTER ( WHERE designation_type NOT LIKE '%Exception%' AND score > 0 AND score <= 40 ) AS band_le_40, count(*) FILTER ( WHERE designation_type NOT LIKE '%Exception%' AND score > 40 AND score <= 50 ) AS band_40_50, count(*) FILTER ( WHERE designation_type NOT LIKE '%Exception%' AND score > 50 AND score <= 55 ) AS band_50_55, count(*) FILTER ( WHERE designation_type NOT LIKE '%Exception%' AND score > 55 AND score <= 62 ) AS band_55_62, count(*) FILTER ( WHERE designation_type NOT LIKE '%Exception%' AND score > 62 ) AS band_gt_62, round(100.0 * count(*) FILTER ( WHERE designation_type NOT LIKE '%Exception%' AND score > 55 AND score <= 62 ) / count(*) FILTER ( WHERE designation_type NOT LIKE '%Exception%' AND score > 0 ), 1) AS band_55_62_pct, count(*) FILTER ( WHERE designation_type LIKE '%Exception%' AND score > 0 ) AS scored_exception, count(*) FILTER ( WHERE designation_type LIKE '%Exception%' ) AS exception_designations, count(*) FILTER ( WHERE designation_type NOT LIKE '%Exception%' AND coalesce(score, 0) <= 0 ) AS standard_missing_imu, count(*) FILTER ( WHERE designation_type LIKE '%Exception%' AND coalesce(score, 0) <= 0 ) AS exception_missing_imu, count(*) FILTER (WHERE coalesce(score, 0) <= 0) AS missing_imu, count(*) AS active_designations FROM active; -- a. IMU <= 40 (deepest need) ...... 166 -- b. IMU 40-50 ..................... 546 -- c. IMU 50-55 ..................... 777 -- d. IMU 55-62 (just under cutoff) . 2,311 <- 60.7% of scored standard designations -- e. IMU > 62 (above cutoff) ....... 8 -- (mean IMU across these 3,808 scored standard designations = 54.8; range 18.1-74.7.) -- reconciliation: 4,148 active - 216 exceptions - 124 scoreless standard = 3,808 -- missing IMU: 124 standard + 146 exception = 270; the 146 sit within the 216 exceptions. -- ============================================================================ -- (5) The Governor's Exception. 216 active designations (140 areas + 76 -- populations) were made despite not qualifying on the index — at a state -- governor's request under HRSA's exception process. Among the 70 of them -- that carry a published IMU, the average is 72.0, above the 62.0 cutoff, -- exactly as the exception is designed to allow. -- ============================================================================ -- audit-claim: exception-vector WITH d AS ( SELECT (designation_type LIKE '%Exception%') AS is_governors_exception, score FROM public.hrsa_shortage_areas WHERE designation_kind = 'mua_mup' AND status = 'Designated' ) SELECT is_governors_exception, count(*) AS designations, count(*) FILTER (WHERE score > 0) AS with_published_imu, round(avg(score) FILTER (WHERE score > 0), 1) AS avg_imu_scored, round(100.0 * count(*) / sum(count(*)) OVER (), 1) AS exception_pct_of_active FROM d GROUP BY is_governors_exception ORDER BY is_governors_exception; -- standard 3,932 · 3,808 scored · avg IMU 54.8 -- governors_exception 216 · 70 scored · avg IMU 72.0 (above the 62.0 cutoff) -- ============================================================================ -- (6) WHERE the active designations are, and how old each state's map is. Top -- 12 states by count, with each state's median designation date and the -- share predating 2000. California and Texas lead by count, but North -- Carolina and Georgia run a median date of 1978; Florida is the outlier -- with a 2001 median and only 30.2% predating 2000. -- ============================================================================ -- audit-claim: state-vector WITH d AS ( SELECT * FROM public.hrsa_shortage_areas WHERE designation_kind = 'mua_mup' AND status = 'Designated' AND state IS NOT NULL ) SELECT state, count(*) AS designations, percentile_disc(0.5) WITHIN GROUP (ORDER BY designation_date) AS median_designation_date, round(100.0 * count(*) FILTER (WHERE designation_date < '2000-01-01') / count(*), 1) AS pct_pre_2000 FROM d GROUP BY state ORDER BY designations DESC LIMIT 12; -- CA 213 median 1994-08-01 69.5% pre-2000 -- TX 212 median 1984-07-03 65.1% -- IL 176 median 1994-05-18 72.2% -- GA 168 median 1978-11-01 82.7% -- PA 156 median 1994-05-12 82.7% -- OH 137 median 1994-05-12 79.6% -- NY 132 median 1994-05-04 82.6% -- FL 129 median 2001-09-26 30.2% <- the outlier: a refreshed map -- MO 123 median 1992-08-04 94.3% -- MI 115 median 1994-05-27 67.8% -- NC 113 median 1978-11-01 95.6% -- KY 112 median 1990-11-23 67.0% -- Direct North Carolina values used outside the public top-eight table. -- audit-claim: north-carolina-age SELECT count(*) AS north_carolina_designations, percentile_disc(0.5) WITHIN GROUP (ORDER BY designation_date) AS median_designation_date, round(100.0 * count(*) FILTER (WHERE designation_date < DATE '2000-01-01') / count(*), 1) AS pre_2000_pct FROM public.hrsa_shortage_areas WHERE designation_kind = 'mua_mup' AND status = 'Designated' AND state = 'NC'; -- North Carolina 113 · median 1978-11-01 · 95.6% pre-2000 -- ============================================================================ -- (7) Structure: areas vs populations, and the exception split. 86.0% of the -- active map is area-based (MUA), 14.0% population-based (MUP). -- ============================================================================ -- audit-claim: designation-type-vector SELECT count(*) FILTER (WHERE designation_type LIKE 'Medically Underserved Area%') AS area_based, round(100.0 * count(*) FILTER ( WHERE designation_type LIKE 'Medically Underserved Area%' ) / count(*), 1) AS area_based_pct, count(*) FILTER (WHERE designation_type LIKE 'Medically Underserved Population%') AS population_based, round(100.0 * count(*) FILTER ( WHERE designation_type LIKE 'Medically Underserved Population%' ) / count(*), 1) AS population_based_pct FROM public.hrsa_shortage_areas WHERE designation_kind = 'mua_mup' AND status = 'Designated'; -- area-based 3,567 (86.0%) · population-based 581 (14.0%)

Download the data: SQL · JSON · CSV

Cite this study

Citation-ready for researchers and AI.

Fonteum Research Bureau (2026). Medically Underserved Areas: A Map Drawn Last Century. HRSA HPSA, snapshot 2026-05-28. https://fonteum.com/research/medically-underserved-areas-designation-age-2026

Check the chain

The cited snapshot identifies the federal file. Where an attestation is present, its file hash can be re-derived; figures are not individually signed.

1
Snapshot
hrsa-hpsa · 2026-05-28
2
Supplied file hash
Not supplied
3
Snapshot attestation
Inspect supplied artifact
Figures are not individually signed · check it in Attest →

Federal source citations

  1. HRSA HPSA · snapshot 2026-05-28 · federal source family · US-Government-Works

Fonteum LLC · June 16, 2026 · All figures trace to the frozen federal-data snapshot cited above.

What’s on file, by the numbers

Platform snapshot · 2026-08-14

13.4Mproviders & companiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities on file
26.2Msource-linked factsSource-linked field facts in the dated platform snapshot
90sources with dataDistinct snapshot source IDs with at least one positive record count
72fresh sourcesDistinct source IDs whose latest positive-data snapshot falls within the preceding 45 days
111sources integratedActive registry rows; integration does not establish a load
13state Medicaid jurisdictionsDistinct states represented in the state-exclusions serving table

Integrated, with-data, and fresh-observation counts are separate. No platform-wide source-completeness count is published. Completeness is source-specific and must be evaluated against the named source's expected scope. State coverage is a separate jurisdiction measure.

Source authority is record-specific

Use the issuer named on the record.

Fonteum spans federal, state, and global public publishers. A source page or returned record identifies its issuer and dataset where that metadata is available. A platform registry count does not assign every page to one authority or establish loaded, fresh, or complete coverage.

Browse source records and their stated limitations →

Reproducible by design

Inspect the evidence each published figure actually supplies.

Source and date

Research pages expose the named public file and observation date where those fields are available. Source-file SHA-256 coverage is separate; facts do not currently link deterministically to signatures.

Available derivation

Studies with a retained release and committed derivation link the SQL or method used. Other studies state the evidence and reproduction limits they actually have.

Daily observations

Dated table row-count observations can detect local drift. They do not imply that an upstream publisher released or Fonteum ingested new data that day.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Request access