CPSC Product Recalls — Counted by Brand
What brands have the most recalls?
On the CPSC consumer-product recall record, Sears is the most-recalled firm — named on 81 of the 9,862 recalls since 1973, ahead of Polaris Industries Inc. (79) and Kmart (56). But no brand dominates: the 25 most-recalled firms together account for just 8.4% of all brand-recall appearances — a very long tail. CPSC often records the recalling retailer for store-brand goods, which is why retailers and powersports makers lead.
Key findings
is the most-recalled firm on the CPSC record: it is named on 81 of the 9,862 recalls since 1973 — 1.5% of the 5,419 recalls that name a firm — just ahead of Polaris Industries Inc. (79) and Kmart (56).
of all 8,116 brand-recall appearances belong to the 25 most-recalled firms (685 of them). The top 10 hold only 5.7% and the single most-recalled firm 1% — the record is a very long tail, with 5,646 distinct firms carrying at least one recall.
lead the list. CPSC frequently names the recalling retailer for store-brand goods, so big-box chains (Sears, Kmart, Toys R Us, Wal-Mart, Target) sit alongside outdoor-equipment makers (Polaris, Deere, Arctic Cat). Only 54.9% of recalls name a firm at all, so the leaderboard counts that subset.
recalls cite "Choking" — the most common coded hazard, ahead of "Fire & Fire-Related Burn" (324). Among the 6,844 recalls with a product category, "Clothing (Children)" leads (259); children's products dominate the top of the category list.
recalls were issued in 2007, the busiest year on record — the year of the China-made toy lead-paint wave. Across the 8,095 recalls that report a unit total, the median recall covers 7,000 units while the mean is 80,523 — a handful of mass recalls drive the gap.
At a glance
The most-recalled brands
The 25 firms named on the most distinct recalls, with the affected-unit total where the record carries one. A recall that names more than one firm is counted for each firm it lists. The list mixes retailers — CPSC frequently records the recalling retailer for store-brand goods — with powersports and outdoor-equipment makers. Only the 5,419 recalls that name a firm (54.9% of the total) feed this leaderboard.
| # | Brand (firm) | Recalls | Affected units |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Sears | 81 | — |
| 2 | Polaris Industries Inc. | 79 | 987,103 |
| 3 | Kmart | 56 | — |
| 4 | Toys R Us | 55 | — |
| 5 | Wal-Mart | 46 | — |
| 6 | Deere & Company | 32 | 392,981 |
| 7 | JC Penney | 32 | — |
| 8 | Arctic Cat Inc. | 30 | 371,178 |
| 9 | Target | 29 | 460,000 |
| 10 | Montgomery Ward | 25 | — |
| 11 | Fisher-Price | 24 | 1,880,000 |
| 12 | Playskool | 22 | — |
| 13 | Black & Decker | 18 | — |
| 14 | Century Products | 17 | — |
| 15 | Textron Specialized Vehicles | 15 | 250,303 |
| 16 | General Electric | 14 | — |
| 17 | Service Merchandise | 13 | — |
| 18 | Home Depot | 13 | — |
| 19 | Hedstrom | 13 | — |
| 20 | American Honda Motor Co. Inc. | 12 | 464,250 |
| 21 | Bombardier Recreational Products Inc. | 12 | 87,321 |
| 22 | Cosco | 12 | — |
| 23 | Graco | 12 | — |
| 24 | Caldor | 12 | — |
| 25 | Woolworth | 11 | — |
How concentrated the record is
The largest firms’ share of all 8,116 brand-recall appearances. The single most-recalled firm accounts for 1%; the top 25 for 8.4%. Unlike the vehicle-recall record — where a handful of automakers dominate — the consumer-product record is a very long tail: 5,646 distinct firms each carry at least one recall.
| Firms | Recalls | Share of all appearances |
|---|---|---|
| Most-recalled firm | 81 | 1% |
| Top 5 firms | 317 | 3.9% |
| Top 10 firms | 465 | 5.7% |
| Top 25 firms | 685 | 8.4% |
Recalls by hazard
The most-cited hazard categories, using CPSC’s own coded labels. Counts are of distinct recalls citing each category, over the 1,588recalls that carry a coded hazard (free-text hazard descriptions are not counted here). Choking and fire lead by a wide margin — a reflection of how many recalls involve children’s products and electrical goods.
| # | Hazard | Recalls |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Choking | 386 |
| 2 | Fire & Fire-Related Burn | 324 |
| 3 | Laceration | 181 |
| 4 | Electrocution/Electric Shock | 178 |
| 5 | Fall | 110 |
| 6 | Entrapment | 62 |
| 7 | Poisoning | 60 |
| 8 | Strangulation | 47 |
| 9 | Lead | 45 |
| 10 | Collapse | 41 |
| 11 | Vehicle Accident | 38 |
| 12 | Suffocation | 38 |
| 13 | Explosion/Projectiles | 37 |
| 14 | Burn - Not Fire-Related | 37 |
| 15 | Carbon Monoxide (CO) | 14 |
| 16 | Internal Injury | 11 |
| 17 | Drowning | 10 |
| 18 | Entanglement | 9 |
Recalls by product category
The 20 most-recalled product categories, over the 6,844 recalls that carry a category label (a legacy field, present 1973–2019). Children’s products — clothing, toys, cribs, costume jewelry, pacifiers — dominate the top of the list. CPSC’s category vocabulary changed over the years, so two near-identical bicycle labels appear; both are shown as published, not merged.
| # | Product category | Recalls | Affected units |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Clothing (Children) | 259 | 7,611,076 |
| 2 | Bicycles & Accessories | 194 | 1,616,139 |
| 3 | Toy Animals Stuffed/Not Stuffed | 155 | 5,571,030 |
| 4 | Candles & Candle Holders | 143 | 6,971,620 |
| 5 | Adapter/Power Supply/Charger/Battery | 142 | 13,014,795 |
| 6 | Toy Miscellaneous | 129 | 8,177,510 |
| 7 | Cribs | 113 | 10,655,922 |
| 8 | Lights & Accessories | 108 | 4,627,117 |
| 9 | Bicycles and Bicycle Accessories | 107 | 1,810,552 |
| 10 | Chairs, Stools & Benches | 101 | 4,677,806 |
| 11 | Costume/Children's Jewelry | 99 | 7,888,203 |
| 12 | All Terrain Vehicles (ATVs) | 87 | 1,554,836 |
| 13 | Toy Play Sets/Activity Sets | 72 | 3,176,604 |
| 14 | Exercise Machines/Equipment | 69 | 2,617,668 |
| 15 | Electric Heaters | 65 | 3,335,777 |
| 16 | Grills, Smokers & Accessories | 63 | 2,129,584 |
| 17 | Lawn Mowers & Accessories | 61 | 1,493,844 |
| 18 | Scuba Diving/Water Activity Equipment | 61 | 377,027 |
| 19 | Snowmobiles | 60 | 343,010 |
| 20 | Pacifiers & Accessories | 58 | 1,698,000 |
Recalls by year
Recalls by the year CPSC dated them, from 2000 onward (the full series back to 1973 is in the download). Annual volume peaked at 452 in 2007 — the year of the China-made toy lead-paint wave — and the affected-unit total is unreported before 1999. The 2026 row is partial; the snapshot was taken on 2026-06-24.
| Year | Recalls | Affected units |
|---|---|---|
| 2000 | 193 | 8,714,798 |
| 2001 | 245 | 18,937,225 |
| 2002 | 256 | 14,780,244 |
| 2003 | 216 | 10,778,316 |
| 2004 | 278 | 19,956,053 |
| 2005 | 323 | 23,365,032 |
| 2006 | 319 | 24,503,861 |
| 2007 | 452 | 32,409,474 |
| 2008 | 392 | 26,487,974 |
| 2009 | 383 | 27,882,719 |
| 2010 | 362 | 26,524,306 |
| 2011 | 313 | 20,094,295 |
| 2012 | 310 | 53,113,565 |
| 2013 | 290 | 13,235,659 |
| 2014 | 296 | 20,809,543 |
| 2015 | 305 | 16,339,895 |
| 2016 | 330 | 133,411,768 |
| 2017 | 280 | 12,069,405 |
| 2018 | 258 | 17,975,766 |
| 2019 | 241 | 11,031,785 |
| 2020 | 257 | 14,371,773 |
| 2021 | 219 | 12,848,737 |
| 2022 | 292 | 16,003,223 |
| 2023 | 324 | 16,894,692 |
| 2024 | 305 | 17,384,283 |
| 2025 | 420 | 25,853,545 |
| 2026 (partial) | 291 | 12,140,526 |
What this counts — and what it does not
- Recall records, not safety. A recall is the firm and CPSC acting to fix a hazard. A high count reflects how often a firm is named on the public record — frequently as the recalling retailer — not a measure of product quality. This study assigns no score and ranks no brand on safety.
- Distinct recalls. The unit is the CPSC recall number. A recall naming more than one firm is counted for each firm it lists, so brand counts sum to more than the recall total.
- Firms as published. Firm names are taken verbatim from the CPSC record, with only the trailing location annotation stripped so the same firm is not split. The study names no individual.
- Uneven coverage. Only 54.9% of recalls name a firm; the product-category field is absent after 2019; and coded hazard categories cover 1,588 recalls. Each cut states its own coverage.
Methodology
The study aggregates the signed public.cpsc_recalls table in the fonteum-platform warehouse, ingested from CPSC’s public saferproducts.gov Recalls feed (snapshot 2026-06-24). CPSC publishes one record per recall, so the counting unit is the distinct recall_number. The firm, hazard, and product-category fields are arrays and are unnested; a recall’s affected-unit total is one value and is read once per recall.
Brand, hazard, category, and year cuts are plain GROUP BYcounts over the distinct recall set. CPSC annotates each firm name with a location (“, of Chilton, Wis.”); that suffix is stripped — the only transformation applied — so the same firm is not split into fragments. A recall spanning more than one firm is counted for each firm it lists, so the brand counts sum to 8,116brand-recall appearances; concentration shares use that appearances total as the denominator. Hazard cuts read only CPSC’s short coded labels, excluding free-text hazard sentences. Every published figure is re-derivable from the SQL below, whose expected-result comments match the committed JSON snapshot exactly, and every snapshot is content-hashed and witness co-signed.
Reproduce it
Re-derive every figure on this page from the published artifacts:
- Reproducible SQL — the exact GROUP BY counts, with expected-result comments.
- Download JSON · Download CSV — the committed recall-by-brand snapshot.
Re-check the source snapshot
Every figure here traces to a signed source snapshot, not our word for it. The CPSC pull is content-hashed and chained; you can re-hash the published bytes against the attestation yourself.
Re-check a snapshot → — re-hash any Fonteum snapshot and confirm the bytes match the chained attestation.
How to cite this
Fonteum (2026). The Most-Recalled Product Brands: The U.S. Consumer-Product Recall Record Counted by Firm. Derived from the CPSC Recalls feed (snapshot 2026-06-24; recalls dated 1973–2026). https://fonteum.com/gov/research/most-recalled-product-brands-2026
Canonical URL: https://fonteum.com/gov/research/most-recalled-product-brands-2026 · License: U.S. Government Works (public domain; 17 U.S.C. §105)
Related evidence
Limitations
- This counts recalls on the snapshot date, not a settled historical series; a recall’s affected-unit count can be amended after it is first published.
- Firm coverage is uneven and has fallen over time, so the all-time leaderboard skews toward long-established retailers; it is not a like-for-like comparison across firms of different size or era, and is not a safety measure.
- Firm attribution follows the CPSC record as published, including multi-firm recalls and recalls where the named firm is the retailer rather than the manufacturer; it is not deduplicated to a parent corporate group.
- Affected-unit totals are reported as published and use mixed units of measure (mostly product counts, occasionally pounds or volume), so unit sums are indicative, not exact product counts.
- A recall is an administrative safety action on the record as of the date queried, not a judgment about any brand or product. Confirm any specific recall’s status at CPSC.
Sources
One published source: the CPSC Recalls feed, a U.S. Government public record issued by the Consumer Product Safety Commission. Every figure is sourced to the snapshot date shown below.
Source: U.S. Consumer Product Safety Commission — Recalls (saferproducts.gov RestServices feed), snapshot 2026-06-24. Public domain (U.S. Government Works). Confirm any specific recall at cpsc.gov/Recalls. Confirm current status at SAM.gov →
Frequently asked questions
What brands have the most recalls?
On the CPSC consumer-product recall record, Sears is named on the most recalls — 81 of the 9,862 recalls since 1973, 1.5% of the 5,419 that name a firm — ahead of Polaris Industries Inc. (79) and Kmart (56). CPSC often records the recalling retailer for store-brand goods, so retailers and powersports makers lead. This counts recall records, an administrative fact about the public list; it is not a quality or reliability ranking.
Does the most-recalled brand mean the least safe brand?
No. A recall is the firm and CPSC acting to fix a hazard, so a high recall count reflects how often a firm is named on the public record — which for consumer goods is frequently the retailer or brand owner of store-label products — not a measure of product quality. Long-established, high-volume sellers naturally accumulate more recalls. This study reports the count from the public record and makes no determination about any brand or product.
Why do old retailers like Sears and Kmart top the list?
CPSC records the firm conducting each recall, and for store-brand or privately-labelled goods that is often the retailer rather than the original manufacturer. Large, long-running chains therefore accumulate many recalls over decades. Because firm coverage is uneven — only 5,419 of 9,862 recalls (54.9%) name a firm at all, and that share has fallen over time — the all-time leaderboard skews toward established retailers. The record is shown as published.
How is a “recall” counted here?
The unit is the distinct CPSC recall (recall_number) — 9,862 in this snapshot, dated 1973-06-08 to 2026-06-18. The firm field is an array; a recall naming more than one firm (18.6% of named recalls do) is counted for each firm it lists, so brand counts sum to 8,116 appearances — more than the 5,419 recalls that name a firm. CPSC annotates each firm with a location, which is stripped so the same firm is not split into fragments.
How many units do these recalls cover?
Across the 8,095 recalls that report a unit total, the published figures sum to 651,831,573 units, but CPSC's unit of measure is not consistent — most figures are product counts, while some bulk recalls report pounds or volume (the single largest figure, 118 million in 2016, is a propane-inspection recall measured in pounds, not products). Because of that and a few mass recalls, the median recall covers only 7,000 units against a mean of 80,523.
How can I reproduce these numbers?
Every figure is re-derivable in Postgres from the published SQL (linked on this page) against the signed public.cpsc_recalls table. The brand, hazard, category, and year cuts are plain GROUP BY counts over the distinct recall set, with the firm field unnested and its location suffix stripped. Each query carries an expected-result comment that matches the committed JSON snapshot exactly, and the source snapshot is content-hashed and witness co-signed.