Skip to content
FonteumThe Graph
DataResearchCare CompareThe DifferAttestAPI
See the proof
  • Data
  • Research
  • Care Compare
  • The Differ
  • Attest
  • API
See the proof

← All sources · Life sciences

CMS Part D Spending

CMS Medicare Part D Spending by Drug

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) · Tier-1 · research-only (never on individual profiles)

Research-only
Source:CMS Part D Spending·Snapshot May 2026Open official source ↗

The CMS Medicare Part D Spending by Drug file reports per-drug Part D spending — total spend, claims, beneficiaries, dosage units, average spend, a high-spend outlier flag, and year-over-year change — by brand, generic, and manufacturer. It is drug-keyed and carries no provider identifier; the 'Overall' manufacturer row is the aggregate across all manufacturers of a drug.

What Fonteum uses it for

How this source shows up on Fonteum.

Tier-1 drug-level Medicare Part D spending reference for /data and /research pages, keyed on brand × generic × manufacturer. The read API resolves on the brand name. There is no NPI and no entity-graph linkage.

What this source does NOT mean

Part D spending describes drug-level program cost — it is not a statement about any prescriber or provider, not a clinical recommendation, and a high-spend drug is not a Fonteum judgment about the drug or its manufacturer.

What this dataset answers

Research and data questions this source supports.

  • 01Pull total Medicare Part D spending, claims, and beneficiaries for a drug by brand, generic, and manufacturer.
  • 02Build a drug-cost trend view using the year-over-year change in average spend per dosage unit.
  • 03Identify high-spend outlier drugs for a prescription-cost research study.
  • 04Cross-reference Part D spending against Drugs@FDA approvals and the NDC directory by manufacturer.

Dataset size: 14,309 drug × manufacturer rows (2026-06-14 snapshot)

Fields used

Per-field display contract.

Every field below has a `display_allowed` flag in the §94 provenance schema. Write-locked fields are captured to provenance for audit but never rendered on profile pages.

Research-only — never on profiles

8 fields
brand_nameBrand name
generic_nameGeneric name
manufacturer_nameManufacturer (or 'Overall' aggregate)
data_yearData year
total_spendingTotal Part D spending (USD)
total_claimsTotal claims
total_beneficiariesTotal beneficiaries
change_avg_spend_per_dosage_unitYoY change in avg spend per dosage unit
Limitations

What we can’t infer from this source.

  • Drug-keyed (brand + generic + manufacturer) — there is no provider NPI and no entity-graph linkage.
  • Tier-1 — aggregate research context only; never rendered on individual provider profiles.
  • Fonteum holds the latest published data year; the file lags the calendar year.
  • Spending is a program-cost fact, not a quality or appropriateness measure of the drug or manufacturer.
Source metadata

Authority, license, refresh cadence.

Authority

Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS)

Tier

Tier-1 · research-only (never on individual profiles)

Refresh cadence

Annual — CMS republishes the Part D Spending by Drug file under a fresh release-dated path; Fonteum resolves the live CSV by the stable dataset UUID.

License

U.S. government public-domain works. Free to use with attribution; explicit redistribution rights. License ↗

Official URL

https://data.cms.gov/summary-statistics-on-use-and-payments/medicare-medicaid-spending-by-drug/medicare-part-d-spending-by-drug

Attribution requirement

Source: Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) — Medicare Part D Spending by Drug · Data Year {YYYY}

ToS & usage notes

What the source allows.

U.S. government public-domain works. CMS publishes the Medicare Part D Spending by Drug file as a no-auth bulk CSV at data.cms.gov with explicit redistribution rights. Fonteum resolves the live release-dated CSV by the stable dataset UUID and attests each snapshot.

Sample provenance

What a single field looks like in the graph.

A worked example. Every field surfaced from this source carries this shape of provenance line — source · last checked · display rule · confidence (when applicable).

Field

Per-drug Part D spending (research-only)

Sample value

Example Brand · Overall · 2023 · total spending $12.5M · 84,000 beneficiaries

Provenance line

Source: CMS Medicare Part D Spending by Drug · Data Year 2023 · Methodology cms-part-d-spending/v1 · Display rule: drug-keyed — renders on dataset + research pages, no provider linkage

How to access

Official API, bulk download, and Fonteum endpoints.

Official API / download

https://data.cms.gov/summary-statistics-on-use-and-payments/medicare-medicaid-spending-by-drug/medicare-part-d-spending-by-drug ↗

Fonteum surface

https://fonteum.com/api/v1/part-d-spending/{drug} →

Frequently asked

Common questions about CMS Part D Spending.

What is the CMS Medicare Part D Spending by Drug file?
It reports per-drug Medicare Part D spending — total spend, claims, beneficiaries, dosage units, average spend, a high-spend outlier flag, and year-over-year change — by brand, generic, and manufacturer. The 'Overall' manufacturer row is the aggregate across all manufacturers of a drug.
Is this linked to prescribers?
No. The file is drug-keyed (brand + generic + manufacturer) and carries no provider identifier — there is no NPI and no entity-graph linkage. The read API resolves on the brand name.
Which data year is covered?
Fonteum holds the latest published data year (2023 in the current snapshot). As of the 2026-06-14 snapshot, the table holds 14,309 drug × manufacturer rows.
Where is the data published and is it free?
CMS publishes the file annually at data.cms.gov as a no-auth bulk CSV. It is U.S. government public-domain data — free to download and redistribute with attribution. Fonteum resolves the live CSV by the stable dataset UUID and attests each snapshot.
Does high spending mean a drug is overpriced?
No. Spending is a program-cost fact driven by price and volume together. It is not a quality or appropriateness measure of the drug or manufacturer, and it is not a Fonteum judgment.
Related

Where this source already shows up.

Related sources in the graph

  • /sources/fda-drugs-at-fda →
  • /sources/fda-drug-ndc →
  • /sources/fda-enforcement-reports →
See also
  • /sources → The full source library — every dataset Fonteum cites.
  • /data-provenance → The provider graph — pipeline diagram, source-family clusters, field-level provenance examples, display rules.
  • /methodology → Network-wide sourcing, refresh cadence, and corrections policy.
  • /editorial-policy → Independence, sourcing, conflicts, corrections, retractions.

The substrate, by the numbers

9.2Mgraph entitiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities
15.7Mlinked identifiersNPIs, CCNs, LEIs and more, resolved to entities
5Mgraph edgesSource-attested relationships between entities
44federal source familiesDistinct CMS, OIG, HRSA, FDA and peer datasets
35dataset pagesCitable, downloadable /data catalog pages
56reproducible studiesEach shipping the SQL behind its figures

Built on the authoritative federal record

The primary sources, named on every page.

These are the federal agencies whose public datasets Fonteum ingests and attributes — the issuing authorities, not customers or partners. Every figure on the site links back to one of them.

  • CMS
  • HHS-OIG
  • HRSA
  • FDA
  • NLM
  • NUCC
  • Census
  • BLS
  • BEA

See the full source registry, with license and refresh cadence for each →

Reproducible by design

Every figure traces to its federal source.

14-tuple provenance

Every rendered fact ties to a source URL, dataset ID, snapshot date, row key, and SHA-256 — the full chain-of-custody record.

Reproducible SQL

Each study ships the exact query behind its figures, run against the cited federal snapshot. Re-run it yourself.

Daily reconciliation

Published counts are reconciled against the upstream federal datasets on a daily cadence, with drift logged.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Two doors

Use the free API and open data

Query providers, facilities, sanctions, and quality scores — each field carrying its federal source. Self-serve, no call to start.

Explore the API →Browse the data catalog →

Talk to us

Managed pilots, enterprise terms, and audit-ready, signed attestation packages for compliance, risk, and research teams.

Talk to us →
Fonteum
Products
The DifferAttestAPIFHIR API
Data
Care CompareResearchData catalogSources
Company
Why FonteumAboutPressEditorial policyCorrections
Legal
Privacy policyTerms of serviceMedical disclaimer

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

© 2026 Fonteum LLC. All rights reserved.

The U.S. healthcare graph AI can cite — every fact carries its source.

Request access→