Skip to content
FonteumPublic-records evidence
Screen 25 NPIs free →Buy $129 certificate →

Tools · Semantic search

Ask a question in plain English. Get healthcare providers with full provenance.

Search runs against the Fonteum healthcare-provider data graph. Each result is ranked by semantic similarity to your query and carries a fourteen-field provenance trace — source, dataset, snapshot, methodology, last-checked, confidence, availability, and more — so a citation is always one click away.

Provider search results for “购买数字 OpenAI 帐户 👉🏼 acc6.top 👈🏼”

The provider search service is temporarily unavailable for this query.

Source file
Not reported
Published
Not reported
Retrieved
Not reported
Snapshot
Not retained in this result
Data as of
Not reported
How this works
  • Your query is parsed by an LLM (Anthropic Haiku) into structured filters — vertical, state, county, exclusion flags. The raw query also goes through an embedding model (OpenAI text-embedding-3-small) to rank by semantic similarity.
  • Results come from the Fonteum healthcare-provider data graph — confirmed providers across the published methodology. Every result is one Postgres row, ranked by cosine distance, hydrated from the underlying CMS NPPES snapshot.
  • For the API contract, query examples, and code samples see /docs/search.
  • Search shares the same fourteen-field provenance contract as the audit-pack and the MCP server. Tooling that consumes one consumes all three without translation.

What’s on file, by the numbers

Platform snapshot · 2026-08-25

13.4Mproviders & companiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities on file
26.2Msource-linked factsSource-linked field facts in the dated platform snapshot
90sources with dataDistinct snapshot source IDs with at least one positive record count
70fresh sourcesDistinct source IDs whose latest positive-data snapshot falls within the preceding 45 days
111sources integratedActive registry rows; integration does not establish a load
13state Medicaid jurisdictionsDistinct states represented in the state-exclusions serving table

Integrated, with-data, and fresh-observation counts are separate. No platform-wide source-completeness count is published. Completeness is source-specific and must be evaluated against the named source's expected scope. State coverage is a separate jurisdiction measure.

Source authority is record-specific

Use the issuer named on the record.

Fonteum spans federal, state, and global public publishers. A source page or returned record identifies its issuer and dataset where that metadata is available. A platform registry count does not assign every page to one authority or establish loaded, fresh, or complete coverage.

Browse source records and their stated limitations →

Reproducible by design

Inspect the evidence each published figure actually supplies.

Source and date

Research pages expose the named public file and observation date where those fields are available. Source-file SHA-256 coverage is separate; facts do not currently link deterministically to signatures.

Available derivation

Studies with a retained release and committed derivation link the SQL or method used. Other studies state the evidence and reproduction limits they actually have.

Daily observations

Dated table row-count observations can detect local drift. They do not imply that an upstream publisher released or Fonteum ingested new data that day.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Request access