Cross-List Overlap — Sanctions & Exclusion Lists
Who appears on more than one sanctions or exclusion list at once?
Across six U.S. and international sanctions and exclusion lists, the overlap no single list shows: of 11,093 excluded U.S. providers identified by National Provider Identifier on the three exclusion registries, 43.2% (4,795) appear on more than one, and 908 are listed on all three — federal OIG, federal SAM.gov, and a state Medicaid list — at once. Internationally, 84 EU designations carry the UN's own published cross-reference. These are aggregate counts of records that share an identifier; no party is named and no determination is made about anyone.
Key findings
of NPI-identified excluded U.S. providers appear on more than one of the three exclusion registries — 4,795 of 11,093 distinct providers sit on two or three of the OIG LEIE, SAM.gov, and state Medicaid lists at once. No single list shows this; the overlap is computed across them on the shared NPI.
providers are listed on all three registries simultaneously — federal OIG, federal SAM.gov, and a state Medicaid list — 8.2% of the distinct identified set. These are the parties the separate lists would each miss most of.
providers appear on both the OIG LEIE and the SAM.gov exclusion list — the largest pairwise overlap. 1,763 are on LEIE and a state list, and 1,101 on SAM.gov and a state list.
of overlapping providers carry a program-related-conviction exclusion (LEIE §1128(a)(1), 1,788 providers) — the single most common statutory basis among parties on multiple lists, ahead of license-action exclusions (§1128(b)(4), 1,453).
CA and NY record the most multi-list providers (574 and 503), ahead of OH (412) and FL (352). Geography follows population and program-integrity activity, not a single state's list.
EU sanctions designations carry the United Nations' own published reference number and resolve to an active UN listing — the international list publisher's OWN cross-reference, not our inference. The OFAC, EU, and UN lists share no contracting key, so cross-system name matching is deliberately not attempted here.
At a glance
Why no single list shows this
The HHS Office of Inspector General (OIG LEIE), the General Services Administration (SAM.gov), and each state Medicaid program publish exclusions independently. A party can be on several at once, and no one list reveals that. Joining them on the shared National Provider Identifier shows that 43.2% of the 11,093 NPI-identified excluded providers are listed by more than one authority — and 908 by all three. This is the overlap the graph computes; it is exactly what a screen against any single list would miss.
The lists profiled
Six published lists, with the active record count and the snapshot date each was read as-of. The three U.S. exclusion registries and the EU/UN pair participate in an exact-identifier overlap join; the OFAC list is profiled for scale but shares no machine key with the others, so it is not cross-joined.
| List | Active records | Snapshot as-of | In overlap join |
|---|---|---|---|
| OIG LEIE (HHS Office of Inspector General — List of Excluded Individuals/Entities) | 68,055 | 2026-05-08 | Yes |
| SAM.gov Exclusions | 324,126 | 2026-06-18 | Yes |
| State Medicaid exclusion lists (13 states with ingested records) | 22,917 | 2026-06-15 | Yes |
| OFAC Specially Designated Nationals & Consolidated Sanctions lists | 20,009 | 2026-06-23 | Profiled only |
| EU Consolidated Financial Sanctions List (FSF) | 5,994 | 2026-06-05 | Yes |
| UN Security Council Consolidated Sanctions List | 1,002 | 2026-06-20 | Yes |
Pending: the UK OFSI Consolidated List is named in scope but not yet ingested; it will join the international cross-reference once its source family lands.
How many lists each provider is on
The membership distribution across the three U.S. exclusion registries. Buckets are mutually exclusive, so the first three rows sum to the distinct total; the fourth row is the overlap (two or more) called out on its own.
| Listed on… | Providers | Share of distinct set |
|---|---|---|
| On exactly one registry | 6,298 | 56.8% |
| On exactly two registries | 3,887 | 35% |
| On all three registries | 908 | 8.2% |
| On two or more (the overlap) | 4,795 | 43.2% |
The pairwise overlap matrix
Distinct providers (by NPI) on each registry along the diagonal, and the pairwise intersections off it. Read a cell as “providers on the row registry that are also on the column registry.” The matrix is symmetric; 908 providers sit in all three at once.
| OIG LEIE | SAM.gov | State Medicaid | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| On OIG LEIE (federal) | 6,880 | — | 3,747 | 1,763 |
| On SAM.gov (federal) | 3,747 | 4,692 | — | 1,101 |
| On a state Medicaid list | 1,763 | 1,101 | 5,224 | — |
Top overlap categories
For the overlapping providers recorded on the OIG LEIE, the statutory basis of the federal exclusion (the OIG's own exclusion-type code under 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7). A provider can carry more than one code, so the shares are of the category total, not of distinct providers. This is the published code, not any conduct attributed to a named person.
| Code | Statutory basis | Providers | Share |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1128a1 | Mandatory — conviction of a program-related crime [§1128(a)(1)] | 1,788 | 38.1% |
| 1128b4 | Permissive — license revocation, suspension, or surrender [§1128(b)(4)] | 1,453 | 30.9% |
| 1128a4 | Mandatory — felony conviction relating to controlled substances [§1128(a)(4)] | 584 | 12.4% |
| 1128a3 | Mandatory — felony conviction relating to health-care fraud [§1128(a)(3)] | 342 | 7.3% |
| 1128a2 | Mandatory — conviction relating to patient abuse or neglect [§1128(a)(2)] | 225 | 4.8% |
| 1128b14 | Permissive — default on health-education loan or scholarship obligations [§1128(b)(14)] | 130 | 2.8% |
| 1128b7 | Permissive — fraud, kickbacks, and other prohibited activities [§1128(b)(7)] | 53 | 1.1% |
| 1128b5 | Permissive — exclusion / suspension under a federal or state health program [§1128(b)(5)] | 40 | 0.9% |
| 1128b1 | Permissive — misdemeanor conviction relating to fraud [§1128(b)(1)] | 29 | 0.6% |
| 1128b8 | Permissive — entities controlled by a sanctioned individual [§1128(b)(8)] | 27 | 0.6% |
| Other statutory bases | Other statutory bases (§1128(b)(2/3/6), settlement/CIA breaches) | 24 | 0.5% |
Overlap by state
The LEIE-recorded state of the overlapping (two-or-more-list) providers — the geography of the overlap. The largest states track population and program-integrity activity; this is a state cut, not a single state's own list.
| State | Overlapping providers |
|---|---|
| CA | 574 |
| NY | 503 |
| OH | 412 |
| FL | 352 |
| PA | 299 |
| TX | 196 |
| NJ | 153 |
| IL | 124 |
| WV | 121 |
| MI | 114 |
| MD | 100 |
| KY | 92 |
Across borders: the international cross-reference
The international sanctions lists share no contracting key with the U.S. exclusion registries, so they are not cross-joined to them. They do, however, cross-reference each other: the EU Consolidated Financial Sanctions List carries the UN Security Council's own published reference number for each UN-derived designation. Of 5,994 active EU designations, 87 carry such a UN reference and 84 resolve to an active UN listing — parties that appear on both the EU and UN lists at once, on the publisher's own cross-reference rather than our inference. No OFAC-to-EU or OFAC-to-UN match is attempted, because no shared identifier exists and a name-based match is not safe to publish.
What this counts — and what it does not
- Exact identifiers only. The U.S. overlap is keyed on the National Provider Identifier, the one machine key the three exclusion registries share. The international overlap uses the EU's own published UN reference number. No fuzzy name matching is used anywhere.
- NPI-identified slice. Only records carrying a valid 10-digit NPI can join the U.S. overlap. Most SAM.gov exclusions carry no NPI (they are non-healthcare or name-only), so this counts the NPI-identified provider slice, not the whole registry.
- No cross-system claim. The OFAC, EU, and UN sanctions lists are not joined to the U.S. exclusion registries — different identity spaces, no shared key. No party on a sanctions list is matched to a party on an exclusion list here.
- No party named, no score. Every figure is an aggregate count. This study names no individual or entity, produces no per-person report or dossier, and assigns no risk score. An identifier on more than one list is a count of administrative records, not a judgment.
Methodology
The study aggregates the current bitemporal slice of the signed source tables in the fonteum-platform warehouse. The U.S. overlap joins three exclusion registries — public.oig_leie_exclusions (OIG LEIE), public.sam_exclusions (SAM.gov), and public.state_exclusions (state Medicaid lists, 13 states) — on the 10-digit National Provider Identifier, normalized to a valid form (leading digit 1-9). Set membership is a three-way GROUP BY over the distinct NPI sets; the pairwise matrix and the all-three figure are intersections of those sets.
The international cross-reference joins public.eu_sanctions_listings to public.un_sanctions_listings on the EU-published UN reference number (un_id → the UN record's un_data_id / reference_number), filtered to valid_to IS NULL. Every published figure is re-derivable from the SQL below, whose expected-result comments match the committed JSON snapshot exactly. Each source feed refreshes on its own cadence and every snapshot is content-hashed and witness co-signed.
Reproduce it
Re-derive every figure on this page from the published artifacts:
- Reproducible SQL — the exact set-membership and intersection queries, with expected-result comments.
- Download JSON · Download CSV — the committed overlap snapshot.
Re-check the source snapshots
Every figure here traces to signed source snapshots, not our word for it. Each daily pull is content-hashed and chained; you can re-hash the published bytes against the attestation yourself.
Re-check a snapshot → — re-hash any Fonteum snapshot and confirm the bytes match the chained attestation.
How to cite this
Fonteum (2026). Sanctioned Across Borders: Cross-List Overlap of U.S. and International Sanctions & Exclusion Lists. Derived from OIG LEIE, SAM.gov Exclusions, state Medicaid exclusion lists, and the EU and UN consolidated sanctions lists (snapshots 2026-06-25). https://fonteum.com/gov/research/sanctioned-across-borders-2026
Canonical URL: https://fonteum.com/gov/research/sanctioned-across-borders-2026 · License: U.S. Government Works (public domain; 17 U.S.C. §105)
Act on the lists, and related evidence
- Sanctions & exclusion-list monitoring — screen a roster against the live lists →
- The US + EU Sanctions Universe — composition & growth →
- The UN Consolidated Sanctions List, Profiled — 92.8% predates 2020 →
- The Name-Only Exclusion List — 72% of federal exclusions carry no contracting ID →
- Federal Suspension & Debarment Scorecard — the US exclusion registry, ranked →
- Federal records questions, answered →
- Government records evidence — all studies →
Limitations
- This counts active records on each list's snapshot date, not a historical time series. Reinstated or delisted parties age off and are not counted.
- The U.S. overlap is restricted to records carrying a valid NPI. The true overlap including name-only and UEI-only exclusion records is necessarily larger; this is the exact-identifier floor, not a ceiling.
- The category and state cuts use the OIG LEIE fields for the overlapping providers present on the LEIE; an overlapping provider on SAM.gov and a state list but not on LEIE is counted in the membership totals but not in those two cuts.
- A list membership is an administrative fact about the published list on the date queried, not a judgment about any party. Confirm any specific party's current status at the official source.
Sources
Six published lists. The U.S. exclusion registries — the HHS-OIG List of Excluded Individuals/Entities (LEIE), the GSA SAM.gov Exclusions registry, and the state Medicaid exclusion lists — are U.S. and state public records. The international lists are the EU Consolidated Financial Sanctions List (European Commission, CC-BY-4.0) and the UN Security Council Consolidated List (UN material, © United Nations). Each figure is sourced to its list's snapshot date, shown in the table above.
Sources: OIG LEIE (release 2026-05-08), SAM.gov Exclusions (snapshot 2026-06-18), state Medicaid exclusion lists (snapshot 2026-06-15), OFAC SDN (snapshot 2026-06-23), EU Consolidated List (snapshot 2026-06-05), UN Consolidated List (snapshot 2026-06-20). Aggregate counts only; no party named. Confirm current status at SAM.gov →
Frequently asked questions
What does it mean for a party to appear on more than one sanctions or exclusion list?
Each authority — the HHS Office of Inspector General (OIG LEIE), the General Services Administration (SAM.gov), and individual state Medicaid programs — publishes its own exclusion list, and they do not cross-check one another. When the same National Provider Identifier (NPI) appears on more than one of these published lists, the party is listed by more than one authority at once. As of these snapshots, 4,795 of 11,093 NPI-identified providers (43.2%) appear on two or more, and 908 on all three. These are counts of administrative records sharing an identifier; no party is named and no determination is made about anyone.
How is the overlap computed — does it use name matching?
No fuzzy name matching is used. The three U.S. exclusion registries are joined on the 10-digit National Provider Identifier (NPI), the one machine key they share, normalized to a valid form (leading digit 1-9). The international overlap uses the EU Consolidated List's own published UN reference number — the EU itself flags which of its designations derive from a UN listing — so the EU→UN overlap is the publisher's cross-reference, not our inference. The OFAC, EU, and UN lists carry no shared contracting key with the U.S. exclusion registries, so no cross-system identity match is attempted.
Which statutory categories show up most among parties on multiple lists?
Among overlapping providers recorded on the OIG LEIE, the most common statutory basis is a program-related criminal conviction (§1128(a)(1), 1,788 providers), followed by a license revocation, suspension, or surrender (§1128(b)(4), 1,453) and a felony controlled-substance conviction (§1128(a)(4), 584). These are the OIG's own published exclusion-type codes under 42 U.S.C. § 1320a-7; the study reports the code, not any conduct of a named individual.
Is the UK OFSI list included?
Not yet. The UK Office of Financial Sanctions Implementation (OFSI) Consolidated List is named in this study's scope but is not yet ingested on the platform, so it does not join the overlap here. The international cross-reference is currently the EU→UN published link only. The UK list will join once its source family lands; the analysis is built from the lists that are live today and notes the one that is pending.
Does this study identify or score any sanctioned person or entity?
No. Every figure is an aggregate count — by list-membership, statutory category, and state. No sanctioned or excluded individual or entity is named anywhere on this page or in its downloads, and the study produces no per-person report, dossier, or risk score. An identifier appearing on more than one list is a count of administrative records, not a judgment about any party. To check whether a specific party is currently listed, search the official source linked below; status changes over time, so always confirm at the source.
How can I reproduce these numbers?
Every figure is re-derivable in Postgres from the published SQL (linked on this page) against the signed source tables, each filtered to its current bitemporal slice. The U.S. overlap is plain GROUP BY aggregation over the NPI sets; the international figure joins the EU list to the UN list on the EU-published reference number. Each query carries an expected-result comment that matches the committed JSON snapshot exactly, and every source snapshot is content-hashed and witness co-signed.