Skip to content
FonteumPublic-records evidence
Fonteum Care Compare · Washington

Washington nursing homes: 194 Medicare-certified facilities, source-cited quality data.

CMS overall star rating, staffing rating, health inspection rating, ownership type, and Special Focus Facility / candidate status for every Medicare-certified nursing home in Washington — every column traced to the CMS Care Compare NH Provider Information dataset.

Special Focus Facility transparency

0 active Special Focus Facility designations and 5 candidates in Washington — facilities CMS has flagged for repeat health-inspection deficiencies.

  • BREMERTON TRAILS POST ACUTE (BREMERTON) — 1 of 5 stars overall, SFF Candidate
  • Crystal Cove Post Acute (LACEY) — 1 of 5 stars overall, SFF Candidate
  • Colville Health and Rehabilitation of Cascadia (COLVILLE) — 1 of 5 stars overall, SFF Candidate
  • SPOKANE HEALTH & REHABILITATION (SPOKANE) — 1 of 5 stars overall, SFF Candidate
  • AUBURN POST ACUTE (AUBURN) — 1 of 5 stars overall, SFF Candidate

Ownership breakdown — Washington

For profit - Limited Liability company
80
For profit - Corporation
63
Non profit - Corporation
22
For profit - Individual
7

Highest-rated facilities — Washington

Top 25 by CMS overall star rating. The table is an unlinked state inventory.

ProviderCityOverall (of 5)Staffing (of 5)Beds
Grays Harbor Health & Rehabilitation CenterAberdeen53105
Panorama City Conv & Rehab CtrLacey55155
Park Manor Rehabilitation CtrWalla Walla5599
Pacific Care And RehabilitationHoquiam5372
Tacoma Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterTacoma53150
Redmond Care And Rehabilitation CenterRedmond54139
Queen Anne HealthcareSeattle55120
The Oaks At TimberlineVancouver5385
Life Care Center Of Port OrchardPort Orchard54125
Olympia Transitional Care And RehabilitationOlympia54113
Hudson Bay Health And RehabilitationVancouver5392
Shoreline Health And RehabilitationSeattle53114
Lacamas Creek Post AcuteCamas5483
Beacon Hill RehabilitationLongview5467
Regency OmakOmak5556
Rainier RehabilitationPuyallup53117
Life Care Center Of Port TownsendPort Townsend5494
Mira Vista Care CenterMount Vernon5461
Bainbridge Island Health & Rehab CenterBainbridge Island5458
The Oaks At LakewoodTacoma5380
Good Samaritan Health Care CtrYakima54105
Regency Care Center At MonroeMonroe5592
Willow Springs Care And RehabilitationYakima5275
Regency At NorthpointeSpokane54120
Regency Canyon Lakes Rehab And Nursing CenterKennewick5553

Nursing homes by city — Washington

88 cities with Medicare-certified nursing homes in Washington.

Seattle19
Spokane14
Tacoma11
Bellingham6
Everett6
Vancouver6
Yakima6
Puyallup5
Auburn4
Federal Way4
Olympia4
Bremerton3
Centralia3
Des Moines3
Gig Harbor3
Issaquah3
Lacey3
Longview3
Renton3
Walla Walla3
Colville2
Edmonds2
Kennewick2
Lynnwood2
Marysville2
Moses Lake2
Mount Vernon2
Port Orchard2
Redmond2
Richland2
Sequim2
Shelton2
Shoreline2
Wenatchee2
Aberdeen1
Anacortes1
Arlington1
Bainbridge Island1
Battle Ground1
Bellevue1
Blaine1
Bothell1
Brewster1
Burien1
Camas1
Cashmere1
Cheney1
Clarkston1
Colfax1
College Place1
Coupeville1
Ellensburg1
Enumclaw1
Ephrata1
Hoquiam1
Kent1
Kirkland1
Lynden1
Medical Lake1
Mercer Island1
Monroe1
Montesano1
Nespelem1
North Bend1
Omak1
Orting1
Othello1
Pasco1
Port Angeles1
Port Townsend1
Poulsbo1
Pt Orchard1
Pullman1
Raymond1
Sedro Woolley1
Selah1
Silverdale1
Snohomish1
Soap Lake1
Spokane Valley1
Stanwood1
Sunnyside1
Tonasket1
Toppenish1
Union Gap1
University Place1
Wapato1
Woodland1

Methodology · Sources · Corrections log · Editorial policy

What’s on file, by the numbers

Platform snapshot · 2026-08-29

13.4Mproviders & companiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities on file
26.2Msource-linked factsSource-linked field facts in the dated platform snapshot
90sources with dataDistinct snapshot source IDs with at least one positive record count
19fresh sourcesDistinct source IDs whose latest positive-data snapshot falls within the preceding 45 days
111sources integratedActive registry rows; integration does not establish a load
13state Medicaid jurisdictionsDistinct states represented in the state-exclusions serving table

Integrated, with-data, and fresh-observation counts are separate. No platform-wide source-completeness count is published. Completeness is source-specific and must be evaluated against the named source's expected scope. State coverage is a separate jurisdiction measure.

Source authority is record-specific

Use the issuer named on the record.

Fonteum spans federal, state, and global public publishers. A source page or returned record identifies its issuer and dataset where that metadata is available. A platform registry count does not assign every page to one authority or establish loaded, fresh, or complete coverage.

Browse source records and their stated limitations →

Reproducible by design

Inspect the evidence each published figure actually supplies.

Source and date

Research pages expose the named public file and observation date where those fields are available. Source-file SHA-256 coverage is separate; facts do not currently link deterministically to signatures.

Available derivation

Studies with a retained release and committed derivation link the SQL or method used. Other studies state the evidence and reproduction limits they actually have.

Daily observations

Dated table row-count observations can detect local drift. They do not imply that an upstream publisher released or Fonteum ingested new data that day.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Request access