Skip to content
FonteumPublic-records evidence
Fonteum Care Compare · Arkansas

Arkansas nursing homes: 221 Medicare-certified facilities, source-cited quality data.

CMS overall star rating, staffing rating, health inspection rating, ownership type, and Special Focus Facility / candidate status for every Medicare-certified nursing home in Arkansas — every column traced to the CMS Care Compare NH Provider Information dataset.

Editorial note: Arkansas is a state where source-cited public-data coverage is materially thinner than national averages — Fonteum prioritizes full provenance + state context here.

Special Focus Facility transparency

1 active Special Focus Facility designation and 5 candidates in Arkansas — facilities CMS has flagged for repeat health-inspection deficiencies.

  • Concordia Nursing & Rehab, LLC (Bella Vista) — 1 of 5 stars overall, SFF Candidate
  • BARNES HEALTHCARE (LONOKE) — 2 of 5 stars overall, SFF Candidate
  • MEADOWVIEW HEALTHCARE AND REHAB (HUNTSVILLE) — 2 of 5 stars overall, SFF Candidate
  • Pine Bluff Transitional Care (Pine Bluff) — 1 of 5 stars overall, SFF Candidate
  • PINK BUD HOME FOR THE GOLDEN YEARS (GREENWOOD) — 1 of 5 stars overall, SFF Candidate

Ownership breakdown — Arkansas

For profit - Limited Liability company
135
For profit - Corporation
57
Non profit - Corporation
12
Government - County
6

Highest-rated facilities — Arkansas

Top 25 by CMS overall star rating. The table is an unlinked state inventory.

ProviderCityOverall (of 5)Staffing (of 5)Beds
The Springs JonesboroJonesboro54136
The Springs MagnoliaMagnolia52140
The Blossoms At Mountain View Rehab & Nursing CenMountain View5297
Cave City Nursing Home IncCave City5390
The Green House Cottages Of Walnut RidgeWalnut Ridge53119
Ash Flat Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterAsh Flat54105
The Springs Of Mine CreekNashville5278
The Green House Cottages Of Wentworth PlaceMagnolia55126
Southridge Village Nursing And RehabHeber Springs53122
The Springs Of HarrisonHarrison5290
Heartland Rehabilitation And Care CenterBenton53140
The Crossing At Riverside Health And RehabilitatioSearcy54138
Gassville Therapy And LivingGassville55105
Crestpark Helena, LlcHelena55100
Pleasant Manor Nursing & RehabAshdown5488
The Blossoms At Stamps Rehab & Nursing CenterStamps5394
Belle View Estates Rehabilitation And Care CenterMonticello5380
Stella Manor Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterRussellville54124
Southfork River Therapy And LivingSalem5384
Montgomery County Nursing HomeMount Ida55112
The Springs Of ChenalLittle Rock5370
Lonoke Health And Rehab Center, LlcLonoke5380
Dardanelle Nursing And Rehabilitation Center,incDardanelle54110
Manila Healthcare CenterManila5584
The Springs Of HillcrestPrescott5390

Nursing homes by city — Arkansas

121 cities with Medicare-certified nursing homes in Arkansas.

Little Rock15
Hot Springs8
Fort Smith7
Rogers7
Springdale6
Conway5
El Dorado5
Fayetteville5
North Little Rock5
Benton4
Jonesboro4
Batesville3
Cabot3
Camden3
Harrison3
Mountain Home3
Pine Bluff3
Russellville3
Texarkana3
Van Buren3
Arkadelphia2
Ash Flat2
Ashdown2
Bella Vista2
Bentonville2
Bryant2
Crossett2
De Witt2
Heber Springs2
Lonoke2
Magnolia2
Malvern2
Monticello2
Nashville2
Newport2
Paragould2
Pocahontas2
Prescott2
Searcy2
Walnut Ridge2
West Memphis2
Wynne2
Alma1
Atkins1
Barling1
Beebe1
Berryville1
Blytheville1
Booneville1
Brinkley1
Calico Rock1
Carlisle1
Cave City1
Centerton1
Charleston1
Clarksville1
Clinton1
Corning1
Danville1
Dardanelle1
De Queen1
Dermott1
Des Arc1
Dierks1
England1
Eureka Springs1
Fairfield Bay1
Flippin1
Fordyce1
Forrest City1
Gassville1
Glenwood1
Gosnell1
Greenbrier1
Greenwood1
Harrisburg1
Hazen1
Helena1
Hope1
Hot Springs Village1
Huntsville1
Jacksonville1
Jasper1
Judsonia1
Lake City1
Lake Village1
Manila1
Marianna1
Marion1
Marked Tree1
Marshall1
Maumelle1
Mccrory1
Melbourne1
Mena1
Monette1
Morrilton1
Mount Ida1
Mountain View1
Murfreesboro1
Osceola1
Ozark1
Paris1
Perryville1
Piggott1
Prairie Grove1
Rector1
Rison1
Salem1
Sheridan1
Sherwood1
Siloam Springs1
Stamps1
Star City1
Stuttgart1
Taylor1
Trumann1
Waldron1
Warren1
White Hall1
Yellville1

Methodology · Sources · Corrections log · Editorial policy

What’s on file, by the numbers

Platform snapshot · 2026-09-27

13.4Mproviders & companiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities on file
26.2Msource-linked factsSource-linked field facts in the dated platform snapshot
90sources with dataDistinct snapshot source IDs with at least one positive record count
9fresh sourcesDistinct source IDs whose latest positive-data snapshot falls within the preceding 45 days
111sources integratedActive registry rows; integration does not establish a load
13state Medicaid jurisdictionsDistinct states represented in the state-exclusions serving table

Integrated, with-data, and fresh-observation counts are separate. No platform-wide source-completeness count is published. Completeness is source-specific and must be evaluated against the named source's expected scope. State coverage is a separate jurisdiction measure.

Source authority is record-specific

Use the issuer named on the record.

Fonteum spans federal, state, and global public publishers. A source page or returned record identifies its issuer and dataset where that metadata is available. A platform registry count does not assign every page to one authority or establish loaded, fresh, or complete coverage.

Browse source records and their stated limitations →

Reproducible by design

Inspect the evidence each published figure actually supplies.

Source and date

Research pages expose the named public file and observation date where those fields are available. Source-file SHA-256 coverage is separate; facts do not currently link deterministically to signatures.

Available derivation

Studies with a retained release and committed derivation link the SQL or method used. Other studies state the evidence and reproduction limits they actually have.

Daily observations

Dated table row-count observations can detect local drift. They do not imply that an upstream publisher released or Fonteum ingested new data that day.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Request access