Skip to content
FonteumThe Graph

By use case

Exclusion & monitoring (self-serve)Free roster screen — no accountExclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & provider-data enrichmentAudit evidence & defensible programsProvider data for AI / RAGM&A & network diligence

By buyer

Compliance & riskJournalists & newsroomsDevelopers & AI teams

By industry

HealthcareProviders & facilitiesSanctionsOFAC / EU / UK / UN / OIG / SAMFederal contractingSAM · USASpending · FAPIIS

The capability layer

APIREST + bulk accessFor AI agentsModel Context Protocol serverFHIR R4 APIBulk exportAudit packSigned report artifacts; source facts remain separately citedReconciliationSource-vs-source diffsAI answers with sourcesHow records link upHistoryRetained versions for named sources

The differentiator

Coverage & sourcesThe catalogFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareFacility qualityAI answers, comparedBrowse all datasets →
Research

The dev on-ramp

DocsAPI referenceConnect your AI agent (MCP)One-paste installFHIR sandboxLive API surfaceQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrations
Pricing
Sign inFree roster screen →Get a signed certificate →

Solutions

Exclusion & monitoring (self-serve)Exclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & provider-data enrichmentAudit evidence & defensible programsProvider data for AI / RAGM&A & network diligenceCompliance & riskJournalists & newsroomsDevelopers & AI teamsHealthcareSanctionsFederal contracting

Platform

APIFor AI agentsFHIR R4 APIBulk exportAudit packReconciliationAI answers with sourcesHow records link upHistory

Data

Coverage & sourcesFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareAI answers, comparedBrowse all datasets →
Research

Developers

DocsAPI referenceConnect your AI agent (MCP)FHIR sandboxQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrations
Pricing
Sign inFree roster screen →Get a signed certificate →
Fonteum Care Compare · Arkansas

Arkansas nursing homes: 221 Medicare-certified facilities, source-cited quality data.

CMS overall star rating, staffing rating, health inspection rating, ownership type, and Special Focus Facility / candidate status for every Medicare-certified nursing home in Arkansas — every column traced to the CMS Care Compare NH Provider Information dataset.

View at Medicare.gov →All states →
Snapshot May 7, 2026·221 Medicare-certified nursing homes in Arkansas · 1 SFF + 5 candidates·CMS Care Compare — NH Provider Info·Module overview →·Methodology →·Audit Pack →
Source-published 2026-04-29 · State-scoped subset of CMS national snapshot · CMS star-rating publisher cadence: quarterly; loaded snapshot shown separately

Editorial note: Arkansas is a state where source-cited public-data coverage is materially thinner than national averages — Fonteum prioritizes full provenance + state context here.

Special Focus Facility transparency

1 active Special Focus Facility designation and 5 candidates in Arkansas — facilities CMS has flagged for repeat health-inspection deficiencies.

  • Concordia Nursing & Rehab, LLC (Bella Vista) — 1 of 5 stars overall, SFF Candidate
  • BARNES HEALTHCARE (LONOKE) — 2 of 5 stars overall, SFF Candidate
  • MEADOWVIEW HEALTHCARE AND REHAB (HUNTSVILLE) — 2 of 5 stars overall, SFF Candidate
  • Pine Bluff Transitional Care (Pine Bluff) — 1 of 5 stars overall, SFF Candidate
  • PINK BUD HOME FOR THE GOLDEN YEARS (GREENWOOD) — 1 of 5 stars overall, SFF Candidate

Ownership breakdown — Arkansas

For profit - Limited Liability company
135
For profit - Corporation
57
Non profit - Corporation
12
Government - County
6

Highest-rated facilities — Arkansas

Top 25 by CMS overall star rating. The table is an unlinked state inventory.

ProviderCityOverall (of 5)Staffing (of 5)Beds
The Springs JonesboroJonesboro54136
The Springs MagnoliaMagnolia52140
The Blossoms At Mountain View Rehab & Nursing CenMountain View5297
Cave City Nursing Home IncCave City5390
The Green House Cottages Of Walnut RidgeWalnut Ridge53119
Ash Flat Healthcare And Rehabilitation CenterAsh Flat54105
The Springs Of Mine CreekNashville5278
The Green House Cottages Of Wentworth PlaceMagnolia55126
Southridge Village Nursing And RehabHeber Springs53122
The Springs Of HarrisonHarrison5290
Heartland Rehabilitation And Care CenterBenton53140
The Crossing At Riverside Health And RehabilitatioSearcy54138
Gassville Therapy And LivingGassville55105
Crestpark Helena, LlcHelena55100
Pleasant Manor Nursing & RehabAshdown5488
The Blossoms At Stamps Rehab & Nursing CenterStamps5394
Belle View Estates Rehabilitation And Care CenterMonticello5380
Stella Manor Nursing And Rehabilitation CenterRussellville54124
Southfork River Therapy And LivingSalem5384
Montgomery County Nursing HomeMount Ida55112
The Springs Of ChenalLittle Rock5370
Lonoke Health And Rehab Center, LlcLonoke5380
Dardanelle Nursing And Rehabilitation Center,incDardanelle54110
Manila Healthcare CenterManila5584
The Springs Of HillcrestPrescott5390

Nursing homes by city — Arkansas

121 cities with Medicare-certified nursing homes in Arkansas.

Little Rock15
Hot Springs8
Fort Smith7
Rogers7
Springdale6
Conway5
El Dorado5
Fayetteville5
North Little Rock5
Benton4
Jonesboro4
Batesville3
Cabot3
Camden3
Harrison3
Mountain Home3
Pine Bluff3
Russellville3
Texarkana3
Van Buren3
Arkadelphia2
Ash Flat2
Ashdown2
Bella Vista2
Bentonville2
Bryant2
Crossett2
De Witt2
Heber Springs2
Lonoke2
Magnolia2
Malvern2
Monticello2
Nashville2
Newport2
Paragould2
Pocahontas2
Prescott2
Searcy2
Walnut Ridge2
West Memphis2
Wynne2
Alma1
Atkins1
Barling1
Beebe1
Berryville1
Blytheville1
Booneville1
Brinkley1
Calico Rock1
Carlisle1
Cave City1
Centerton1
Charleston1
Clarksville1
Clinton1
Corning1
Danville1
Dardanelle1
De Queen1
Dermott1
Des Arc1
Dierks1
England1
Eureka Springs1
Fairfield Bay1
Flippin1
Fordyce1
Forrest City1
Gassville1
Glenwood1
Gosnell1
Greenbrier1
Greenwood1
Harrisburg1
Hazen1
Helena1
Hope1
Hot Springs Village1
Huntsville1
Jacksonville1
Jasper1
Judsonia1
Lake City1
Lake Village1
Manila1
Marianna1
Marion1
Marked Tree1
Marshall1
Maumelle1
Mccrory1
Melbourne1
Mena1
Monette1
Morrilton1
Mount Ida1
Mountain View1
Murfreesboro1
Osceola1
Ozark1
Paris1
Perryville1
Piggott1
Prairie Grove1
Rector1
Rison1
Salem1
Sheridan1
Sherwood1
Siloam Springs1
Stamps1
Star City1
Stuttgart1
Taylor1
Trumann1
Waldron1
Warren1
White Hall1
Yellville1

Compliance posture

Methodology · Corrections log · Editorial policy

What’s on file, by the numbers

Platform snapshot · 2026-07-15

13.4Mproviders & companiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities on file
26.2Msource-linked factsSource-linked field facts in the dated platform snapshot
—sources liveCrosswalk-resolved sources with a proved content transition in the preceding 45 days
111sources integratedActive registry rows; integration does not establish a load
13state Medicaid jurisdictionsDistinct states represented in the state-exclusions serving table

Built on the authoritative federal record

The primary sources, named on every page.

These are the federal agencies whose public datasets Fonteum ingests and attributes — the issuing authorities, not customers or partners. Every figure on the site links back to one of them.

  • CMS
  • HHS-OIG
  • HRSA
  • FDA
  • NLM
  • NUCC
  • Census
  • BLS
  • BEA

See the full source registry, with license and refresh cadence for each →

Reproducible by design

Published figures name their source and date.

Source and date

Published research identifies its government file and observation date. Source-file SHA-256 coverage is disclosed separately; facts do not currently link deterministically to signatures.

Reproducible SQL

Each study ships the exact query behind its figures, run against the same dated copy of the federal file we used. Re-run it yourself.

Daily observations

The platform records table row counts daily. Those observations detect local drift; they do not imply that an upstream publisher released or Fonteum ingested new data that day.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Fonteum
Platform
Platform overviewAPIFor AI agents (MCP)FHIR R4 APIBulk exportAudit packReconciliationAI answers with sourcesHow records link upHistory
Solutions
All solutionsExclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & enrichmentAudit evidenceProvider data for AI / RAGUse casesM&A & network diligenceCompliance & riskJournalists & newsroomsDevelopers & AI teams
Data & sources
Coverage & sourcesBrowse all datasetsState Medicaid exclusionsFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareNursing homesRecall recordsSanctions screeningOIG LEIE listOwnershipStaffingDeficienciesSpecial Focus Facilities
Federal contracting
OverviewAwards during active exclusionFederal debarment scorecardProcurement questionsContractor lookup8(a) certification guide
Developers
Developer hubDocsAPI referenceQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrationsWebhooks
Research & guides
Research hubLearnHow it worksGuidesHealthcare provider dataExclusion & sanctions screeningProvider credentialing dataHealthcare data for AIHospital margin gapProvider access gapsGlossaryComparisonsSourced data vs plain LLM answersCitationsManifestoWhy Fonteum
Company
AboutPressCustomersPricingContactEditorial policyCorrections
Trust & legal
TrustTrust markQualitySecurityPrivacy policyTerms of serviceAPI termsMedical disclaimer

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

© 2026 Fonteum LLC. All rights reserved.

·hello@fonteum.com

A public-records graph that exposes source and observation metadata where supplied.

Fonteum's provenance ledger contained 26.2M source-linked facts on July 12, 2026. All but 14 carried a source-file SHA-256; 0 linked deterministically to a signature. Inspect a supplied snapshot id at fonteum.com/verify · source-mark coverage and limitations.
Request access→