Skip to content
FonteumThe Graph

By use case

Exclusion & monitoring (self-serve)Free roster screen — no accountExclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & provider-data enrichmentAudit evidence & defensible programsProvider data for AI / RAGM&A & network diligence

By buyer

Compliance & riskJournalists & newsroomsDevelopers & AI teams

By industry

HealthcareProviders & facilitiesSanctionsOFAC / EU / UK / UN / OIG / SAMFederal contractingSAM · USASpending · FAPIIS

The capability layer

APIREST + bulk accessFor AI agentsModel Context Protocol serverFHIR R4 APIBulk exportAudit packSigned report artifacts; source facts remain separately citedReconciliationSource-vs-source diffsAI answers with sourcesHow records link upHistoryRetained versions for named sources

The differentiator

Coverage & sourcesThe catalogFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareFacility qualityAI answers, comparedBrowse all datasets →
Research

The dev on-ramp

DocsAPI referenceConnect your AI agent (MCP)One-paste installFHIR sandboxLive API surfaceQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrations
Pricing
Sign inFree roster screen →Get a signed certificate →

Solutions

Exclusion & monitoring (self-serve)Exclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & provider-data enrichmentAudit evidence & defensible programsProvider data for AI / RAGM&A & network diligenceCompliance & riskJournalists & newsroomsDevelopers & AI teamsHealthcareSanctionsFederal contracting

Platform

APIFor AI agentsFHIR R4 APIBulk exportAudit packReconciliationAI answers with sourcesHow records link upHistory

Data

Coverage & sourcesFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareAI answers, comparedBrowse all datasets →
Research

Developers

DocsAPI referenceConnect your AI agent (MCP)FHIR sandboxQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrations
Pricing
Sign inFree roster screen →Get a signed certificate →
Fonteum Care Compare · Alaska

Alaska nursing homes: 20 Medicare-certified facilities, source-cited quality data.

CMS overall star rating, staffing rating, health inspection rating, ownership type, and Special Focus Facility / candidate status for every Medicare-certified nursing home in Alaska — every column traced to the CMS Care Compare NH Provider Information dataset.

View at Medicare.gov →All states →
Snapshot May 7, 2026·20 Medicare-certified nursing homes in Alaska·CMS Care Compare — NH Provider Info·Module overview →·Methodology →·Audit Pack →
Source-published 2026-04-29 · State-scoped subset of CMS national snapshot · CMS star-rating publisher cadence: quarterly; loaded snapshot shown separately

Editorial note: Alaska is a state where source-cited public-data coverage is materially thinner than national averages — Fonteum prioritizes full provenance + state context here.

Ownership breakdown — Alaska

Non profit - Corporation
8
For profit - Limited Liability company
5
Government - City/county
4
Government - City
2

Highest-rated facilities — Alaska

Top 20 by CMS overall star rating. The table is an unlinked state inventory.

ProviderCityOverall (of 5)Staffing (of 5)Beds
Wrangell Medical Center LtcWrangell5518
Quyanna Care CenterNome5418
Cordova Community Med LtcCordova5510
South Peninsula Hospital LtcHomer5528
Searhc Sitka Long Term CareSitka5519
Utuqqanaat InaatKotzebue5518
Maple Springs Of WasillaWasilla5567
Heritage PlaceSoldotna4560
Petersburg Medical Center LtcPetersburg3115
Denali CenterFairbanks3471
Providence Seward Mountain HavenSeward3440
Wildflower CourtJuneau3457
Polaris Transitional CareAnchorage2450
Providence Kodiak Island Med LtcKodiak2—22
Providence Valdez Medical CenterValdez2—10
Yukon Kuskokwim Elder'S HomeBethel2—18
Ketchikan Med Ctr New Horizons Transitional CareKetchikan1129
Centennial Post AcuteAnchorage14102
Polaris Extended CareAnchorage1196
Maple Springs Of PalmerPalmer1467

Nursing homes by city — Alaska

18 cities with Medicare-certified nursing homes in Alaska.

Anchorage3
Bethel1
Cordova1
Fairbanks1
Homer1
Juneau1
Ketchikan1
Kodiak1
Kotzebue1
Nome1
Palmer1
Petersburg1
Seward1
Sitka1
Soldotna1
Valdez1
Wasilla1
Wrangell1

Compliance posture

Methodology · Corrections log · Editorial policy

What’s on file, by the numbers

Platform snapshot · 2026-07-15

13.4Mproviders & companiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities on file
26.2Msource-linked factsSource-linked field facts in the dated platform snapshot
—sources liveCrosswalk-resolved sources with a proved content transition in the preceding 45 days
111sources integratedActive registry rows; integration does not establish a load
13state Medicaid jurisdictionsDistinct states represented in the state-exclusions serving table

Built on the authoritative federal record

The primary sources, named on every page.

These are the federal agencies whose public datasets Fonteum ingests and attributes — the issuing authorities, not customers or partners. Every figure on the site links back to one of them.

  • CMS
  • HHS-OIG
  • HRSA
  • FDA
  • NLM
  • NUCC
  • Census
  • BLS
  • BEA

See the full source registry, with license and refresh cadence for each →

Reproducible by design

Published figures name their source and date.

Source and date

Published research identifies its government file and observation date. Source-file SHA-256 coverage is disclosed separately; facts do not currently link deterministically to signatures.

Reproducible SQL

Each study ships the exact query behind its figures, run against the same dated copy of the federal file we used. Re-run it yourself.

Daily observations

The platform records table row counts daily. Those observations detect local drift; they do not imply that an upstream publisher released or Fonteum ingested new data that day.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Fonteum
Platform
Platform overviewAPIFor AI agents (MCP)FHIR R4 APIBulk exportAudit packReconciliationAI answers with sourcesHow records link upHistory
Solutions
All solutionsExclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & enrichmentAudit evidenceProvider data for AI / RAGUse casesM&A & network diligenceCompliance & riskJournalists & newsroomsDevelopers & AI teams
Data & sources
Coverage & sourcesBrowse all datasetsState Medicaid exclusionsFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareNursing homesRecall recordsSanctions screeningOIG LEIE listOwnershipStaffingDeficienciesSpecial Focus Facilities
Federal contracting
OverviewAwards during active exclusionFederal debarment scorecardProcurement questionsContractor lookup8(a) certification guide
Developers
Developer hubDocsAPI referenceQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrationsWebhooks
Research & guides
Research hubLearnHow it worksGuidesHealthcare provider dataExclusion & sanctions screeningProvider credentialing dataHealthcare data for AIHospital margin gapProvider access gapsGlossaryComparisonsSourced data vs plain LLM answersCitationsManifestoWhy Fonteum
Company
AboutPressCustomersPricingContactEditorial policyCorrections
Trust & legal
TrustTrust markQualitySecurityPrivacy policyTerms of serviceAPI termsMedical disclaimer

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

© 2026 Fonteum LLC. All rights reserved.

·hello@fonteum.com

A public-records graph that exposes source and observation metadata where supplied.

Fonteum's provenance ledger contained 26.2M source-linked facts on July 12, 2026. All but 14 carried a source-file SHA-256; 0 linked deterministically to a signature. Inspect a supplied snapshot id at fonteum.com/verify · source-mark coverage and limitations.
Request access→