Skip to content
FonteumPublic-records evidence
Fonteum Care Compare · Alaska

Alaska nursing homes: 20 Medicare-certified facilities, source-cited quality data.

CMS overall star rating, staffing rating, health inspection rating, ownership type, and Special Focus Facility / candidate status for every Medicare-certified nursing home in Alaska — every column traced to the CMS Care Compare NH Provider Information dataset.

Editorial note: Alaska is a state where source-cited public-data coverage is materially thinner than national averages — Fonteum prioritizes full provenance + state context here.

Ownership breakdown — Alaska

Non profit - Corporation
8
For profit - Limited Liability company
5
Government - City/county
4
Government - City
2

Highest-rated facilities — Alaska

Top 20 by CMS overall star rating. The table is an unlinked state inventory.

ProviderCityOverall (of 5)Staffing (of 5)Beds
Wrangell Medical Center LtcWrangell5518
Quyanna Care CenterNome5418
Cordova Community Med LtcCordova5510
South Peninsula Hospital LtcHomer5528
Searhc Sitka Long Term CareSitka5519
Utuqqanaat InaatKotzebue5518
Maple Springs Of WasillaWasilla5567
Heritage PlaceSoldotna4560
Petersburg Medical Center LtcPetersburg3115
Denali CenterFairbanks3471
Providence Seward Mountain HavenSeward3440
Wildflower CourtJuneau3457
Polaris Transitional CareAnchorage2450
Providence Kodiak Island Med LtcKodiak222
Providence Valdez Medical CenterValdez210
Yukon Kuskokwim Elder'S HomeBethel218
Ketchikan Med Ctr New Horizons Transitional CareKetchikan1129
Centennial Post AcuteAnchorage14102
Polaris Extended CareAnchorage1196
Maple Springs Of PalmerPalmer1467

Nursing homes by city — Alaska

18 cities with Medicare-certified nursing homes in Alaska.

Anchorage3
Bethel1
Cordova1
Fairbanks1
Homer1
Juneau1
Ketchikan1
Kodiak1
Kotzebue1
Nome1
Palmer1
Petersburg1
Seward1
Sitka1
Soldotna1
Valdez1
Wasilla1
Wrangell1

Methodology · Sources · Corrections log · Editorial policy

What’s on file, by the numbers

Platform snapshot · 2026-09-10

13.4Mproviders & companiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities on file
26.2Msource-linked factsSource-linked field facts in the dated platform snapshot
90sources with dataDistinct snapshot source IDs with at least one positive record count
11fresh sourcesDistinct source IDs whose latest positive-data snapshot falls within the preceding 45 days
111sources integratedActive registry rows; integration does not establish a load
13state Medicaid jurisdictionsDistinct states represented in the state-exclusions serving table

Integrated, with-data, and fresh-observation counts are separate. No platform-wide source-completeness count is published. Completeness is source-specific and must be evaluated against the named source's expected scope. State coverage is a separate jurisdiction measure.

Source authority is record-specific

Use the issuer named on the record.

Fonteum spans federal, state, and global public publishers. A source page or returned record identifies its issuer and dataset where that metadata is available. A platform registry count does not assign every page to one authority or establish loaded, fresh, or complete coverage.

Browse source records and their stated limitations →

Reproducible by design

Inspect the evidence each published figure actually supplies.

Source and date

Research pages expose the named public file and observation date where those fields are available. Source-file SHA-256 coverage is separate; facts do not currently link deterministically to signatures.

Available derivation

Studies with a retained release and committed derivation link the SQL or method used. Other studies state the evidence and reproduction limits they actually have.

Daily observations

Dated table row-count observations can detect local drift. They do not imply that an upstream publisher released or Fonteum ingested new data that day.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Request access