Skip to content
FonteumPublic-records evidence
Screen 25 NPIs free →Buy $129 certificate →
Fonteum Care Compare · Wyoming

Wyoming dialysis facilities: 10 Medicare-certified, 5-star quality data, chain-ownership transparency.

CMS-published 5-star ratings, profit-vs-nonprofit status, chain affiliation, and service offerings (in-center hemodialysis, peritoneal, home hemodialysis training) for every ESRD facility in Wyoming.

Editorial note: Wyoming is a state where source-cited public-data coverage of dialysis chain-ownership is materially thinner than national averages — Fonteum prioritizes full provenance + state context here.

Chain concentration — Wyoming

Dialysis is the most consolidated category in CMS Care Compare. 50.0% of Wyoming facilities are chain-owned; here are the largest chains by facility count in this state.

Independent
5
US Renal Care, Inc.
2
Dialysis Clinic, Inc.
2
Fresenius Medical Care
1

Dialysis facilities — Wyoming

Showing 10 of 10 Medicare-certified facilities, highest CMS 5-star rating first (10 carry a published rating; the remainder are suppressed for low patient volume and shown without a star).

FacilityCityChainRating (of 5)
532501 cheyenne dialysis (fmc)CHEYENNEFresenius Medical Care5
533501 evanston regional hospital/dialysisEVANSTONIndependent5
532304 mem hosp of sweetwater county/dialysisROCK SPRINGSIndependent3
532305 ccmh dialysis unitGilletteIndependent3
Usrc wyoming kidneyCASPERUS Renal Care, Inc.3
532505 big horn basin regional dialysis (dci)CODYDialysis Clinic, Inc.3
532306 ivinson memorial hosp - dialysis centerLARAMIEIndependent2
532506 watt dialysis center llcSHERIDANDialysis Clinic, Inc.2
Usrc cheyenne dialysischeyenneUS Renal Care, Inc.2
532503 wind river dialysis centerFORT WASHAKIEIndependent1

Methodology · Sources · Corrections log · Editorial policy

What’s on file, by the numbers

Platform snapshot · 2026-09-20

13.4Mproviders & companiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities on file
26.2Msource-linked factsSource-linked field facts in the dated platform snapshot
90sources with dataDistinct snapshot source IDs with at least one positive record count
8fresh sourcesDistinct source IDs whose latest positive-data snapshot falls within the preceding 45 days
111sources integratedActive registry rows; integration does not establish a load
13state Medicaid jurisdictionsDistinct states represented in the state-exclusions serving table

Integrated, with-data, and fresh-observation counts are separate. No platform-wide source-completeness count is published. Completeness is source-specific and must be evaluated against the named source's expected scope. State coverage is a separate jurisdiction measure.

Source authority is record-specific

Use the issuer named on the record.

Fonteum spans federal, state, and global public publishers. A source page or returned record identifies its issuer and dataset where that metadata is available. A platform registry count does not assign every page to one authority or establish loaded, fresh, or complete coverage.

Browse source records and their stated limitations →

Reproducible by design

Inspect the evidence each published figure actually supplies.

Source and date

Research pages expose the named public file and observation date where those fields are available. Source-file SHA-256 coverage is separate; facts do not currently link deterministically to signatures.

Available derivation

Studies with a retained release and committed derivation link the SQL or method used. Other studies state the evidence and reproduction limits they actually have.

Daily observations

Dated table row-count observations can detect local drift. They do not imply that an upstream publisher released or Fonteum ingested new data that day.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Request access