Skip to content
FonteumPublic-records evidence
Screen 25 NPIs free →Buy $129 certificate →
Fonteum Care Compare · West Virginia

West Virginia dialysis facilities: 41 Medicare-certified, 5-star quality data, chain-ownership transparency.

CMS-published 5-star ratings, profit-vs-nonprofit status, chain affiliation, and service offerings (in-center hemodialysis, peritoneal, home hemodialysis training) for every ESRD facility in West Virginia.

Editorial note: West Virginia is a state where source-cited public-data coverage of dialysis chain-ownership is materially thinner than national averages — Fonteum prioritizes full provenance + state context here.

Chain concentration — West Virginia

Dialysis is the most consolidated category in CMS Care Compare. 95.1% of West Virginia facilities are chain-owned; here are the largest chains by facility count in this state.

Fresenius Medical Care
30
DaVita
9
Independent
2

Dialysis facilities — West Virginia

Showing 25 of 41 Medicare-certified facilities, highest CMS 5-star rating first (39 carry a published rating; the remainder are suppressed for low patient volume and shown without a star).

FacilityCityChainRating (of 5)
Fresenius medical care of charles townKEARNEYSVILLEFresenius Medical Care4
Bma martinsburgMARTINSBURGFresenius Medical Care3
Fmc elkinsELKINSFresenius Medical Care3
Davita new martinsville dialysisNew MartinsvilleDaVita3
Fresenius medical care of westonWESTONFresenius Medical Care3
Fresenius medical care of bruceton millsBRUCETON MILLSFresenius Medical Care3
Davita mountaineer dialysisBECKLEYDaVita3
Davita harrison county dialysisCLARKSBURGDaVita3
Fresenius medical care eastern panhandleMARTINSBURGFresenius Medical Care3
Davita wood county dialysisPARKERSBURGDaVita3
Davita wheeling dialysisWHEELINGDaVita2
Fmc dialysis services two virginiasBLUEFIELDFresenius Medical Care2
Davita grand central dialysisVIENNADaVita2
Davita greater charleston dialysisSOUTH CHARLESTONDaVita2
Fmc dialysis services of fairmontPleasant ValleyFresenius Medical Care2
Fresenius medical care clarksburgBRIDGEPORTFresenius Medical Care2
Mountain ridge dialysis llcSUMMERSVILLEFresenius Medical Care2
Fresenius medical care ripleyRIPLEYFresenius Medical Care2
Davita renal center of keyserKEYSERDaVita2
Fresenius medical care appalachian dialysisBECKLEYFresenius Medical Care2
Fresenius medical care of graftonGRAFTONFresenius Medical Care2
Fresenius medical care upshur countyBUCKHANNONFresenius Medical Care2
Fresenius medical care braxton countySUTTONFresenius Medical Care2
Bma charlestonCHARLESTONFresenius Medical Care1
Bma beckleyBECKLEYFresenius Medical Care1

Methodology · Sources · Corrections log · Editorial policy

What’s on file, by the numbers

Platform snapshot · 2026-09-20

13.4Mproviders & companiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities on file
26.2Msource-linked factsSource-linked field facts in the dated platform snapshot
90sources with dataDistinct snapshot source IDs with at least one positive record count
8fresh sourcesDistinct source IDs whose latest positive-data snapshot falls within the preceding 45 days
111sources integratedActive registry rows; integration does not establish a load
13state Medicaid jurisdictionsDistinct states represented in the state-exclusions serving table

Integrated, with-data, and fresh-observation counts are separate. No platform-wide source-completeness count is published. Completeness is source-specific and must be evaluated against the named source's expected scope. State coverage is a separate jurisdiction measure.

Source authority is record-specific

Use the issuer named on the record.

Fonteum spans federal, state, and global public publishers. A source page or returned record identifies its issuer and dataset where that metadata is available. A platform registry count does not assign every page to one authority or establish loaded, fresh, or complete coverage.

Browse source records and their stated limitations →

Reproducible by design

Inspect the evidence each published figure actually supplies.

Source and date

Research pages expose the named public file and observation date where those fields are available. Source-file SHA-256 coverage is separate; facts do not currently link deterministically to signatures.

Available derivation

Studies with a retained release and committed derivation link the SQL or method used. Other studies state the evidence and reproduction limits they actually have.

Daily observations

Dated table row-count observations can detect local drift. They do not imply that an upstream publisher released or Fonteum ingested new data that day.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Request access