Skip to content
FonteumPublic-records evidence
Fonteum Care Compare · Maine

Maine dialysis facilities: 21 Medicare-certified, 5-star quality data, chain-ownership transparency.

CMS-published 5-star ratings, profit-vs-nonprofit status, chain affiliation, and service offerings (in-center hemodialysis, peritoneal, home hemodialysis training) for every ESRD facility in Maine.

Chain concentration — Maine

Dialysis is the most consolidated category in CMS Care Compare. 95.2% of Maine facilities are chain-owned; here are the largest chains by facility count in this state.

Fresenius Medical Care
13
DaVita
4
Dialysis Clinic, Inc.
3
Independent
1

Dialysis facilities — Maine

Showing 21 of 21 Medicare-certified facilities, highest CMS 5-star rating first (20 carry a published rating; the remainder are suppressed for low patient volume and shown without a star).

FacilityCityChainRating (of 5)
Fmc southern maine dialysis facilityPORTLANDFresenius Medical Care5
Fmc casco bay dialysis facilityWESTBROOKFresenius Medical Care5
Dci skowheganSKOWHEGANDialysis Clinic, Inc.5
Fmc york county dialysis centerBIDDEFORDFresenius Medical Care4
Fmc damariscotta dialysisDAMARISCOTTAFresenius Medical Care4
Fmc umbagog kidney centerWILTONFresenius Medical Care4
Davita eastern maine dialysisELLSWORTHDaVita4
Dci greater watervilleFAIRFIELDDialysis Clinic, Inc.4
Fmc freedom center fore riverPortlandFresenius Medical Care4
Fmc lewiston auburn kidney centerLewistonFresenius Medical Care3
Fmc coastal dialysis centerBATHFresenius Medical Care3
Fmc kennebec kidney centerAUGUSTAFresenius Medical Care3
Fmc androscoggin kidney centerAUBURNFresenius Medical Care3
Fmc - sunrise county dialysisEASTPORTFresenius Medical Care3
Dialysis clinic inc. - belfastBELFASTDialysis Clinic, Inc.3
Davita boyd dialysisBANGORDaVita3
Davita lincoln lakes regional dialysisLINCOLNDaVita3
Fresenius kidney care gardinerGARDINERFresenius Medical Care3
Northern light dialysisPRESQUE ISLEIndependent3
Davita brewer dialysisBrewerDaVita2
Fresenius kidney care greater lewistonLewistonFresenius Medical Care

Methodology · Sources · Corrections log · Editorial policy

What’s on file, by the numbers

Platform snapshot · 2026-09-20

13.4Mproviders & companiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities on file
26.2Msource-linked factsSource-linked field facts in the dated platform snapshot
90sources with dataDistinct snapshot source IDs with at least one positive record count
8fresh sourcesDistinct source IDs whose latest positive-data snapshot falls within the preceding 45 days
111sources integratedActive registry rows; integration does not establish a load
13state Medicaid jurisdictionsDistinct states represented in the state-exclusions serving table

Integrated, with-data, and fresh-observation counts are separate. No platform-wide source-completeness count is published. Completeness is source-specific and must be evaluated against the named source's expected scope. State coverage is a separate jurisdiction measure.

Source authority is record-specific

Use the issuer named on the record.

Fonteum spans federal, state, and global public publishers. A source page or returned record identifies its issuer and dataset where that metadata is available. A platform registry count does not assign every page to one authority or establish loaded, fresh, or complete coverage.

Browse source records and their stated limitations →

Reproducible by design

Inspect the evidence each published figure actually supplies.

Source and date

Research pages expose the named public file and observation date where those fields are available. Source-file SHA-256 coverage is separate; facts do not currently link deterministically to signatures.

Available derivation

Studies with a retained release and committed derivation link the SQL or method used. Other studies state the evidence and reproduction limits they actually have.

Daily observations

Dated table row-count observations can detect local drift. They do not imply that an upstream publisher released or Fonteum ingested new data that day.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Request access