Skip to content
FonteumThe Graph

By use case

Exclusion & monitoring (self-serve)Free roster screen — no accountExclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & provider-data enrichmentAudit evidence & defensible programsProvider data for AI / RAGM&A & network diligence

By buyer

Compliance & riskJournalists & newsroomsDevelopers & AI teams

By industry

HealthcareProviders & facilitiesSanctionsOFAC / EU / UK / UN / OIG / SAMFederal contractingSAM · USASpending · FAPIIS

The capability layer

APIREST + bulk accessFor AI agentsModel Context Protocol serverFHIR R4 APIBulk exportAudit packSigned report artifacts; source facts remain separately citedReconciliationSource-vs-source diffsAI answers with sourcesHow records link upHistoryRetained versions for named sources

The differentiator

Coverage & sourcesThe catalogFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareFacility qualityAI answers, comparedBrowse all datasets →
Research

The dev on-ramp

DocsAPI referenceConnect your AI agent (MCP)One-paste installFHIR sandboxLive API surfaceQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrations
Pricing
Sign inFree roster screen →Get a signed certificate →

Solutions

Exclusion & monitoring (self-serve)Exclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & provider-data enrichmentAudit evidence & defensible programsProvider data for AI / RAGM&A & network diligenceCompliance & riskJournalists & newsroomsDevelopers & AI teamsHealthcareSanctionsFederal contracting

Platform

APIFor AI agentsFHIR R4 APIBulk exportAudit packReconciliationAI answers with sourcesHow records link upHistory

Data

Coverage & sourcesFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareAI answers, comparedBrowse all datasets →
Research

Developers

DocsAPI referenceConnect your AI agent (MCP)FHIR sandboxQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrations
Pricing
Sign inFree roster screen →Get a signed certificate →
Fonteum Care Compare · Kansas

Kansas dialysis facilities: 59 Medicare-certified, 5-star quality data, chain-ownership transparency.

CMS-published 5-star ratings, profit-vs-nonprofit status, chain affiliation, and service offerings (in-center hemodialysis, peritoneal, home hemodialysis training) for every ESRD facility in Kansas.

Cross-check at Medicare.gov →All states →
Snapshot May 7, 2026·59 Medicare-certified dialysis facilities in Kansas · 91.5% chain-owned·CMS Care Compare — Dialysis·Module overview →·Methodology →·Audit Pack →
Source-modified 2026-03-25 · Quality measures suppressed when <11 patients in measure period · ICH CAHPS patient-experience measures are a separate CMS dataset, not included in this snapshot

Editorial note: Kansas is a state where source-cited public-data coverage of dialysis chain-ownership is materially thinner than national averages — Fonteum prioritizes full provenance + state context here.

Chain concentration — Kansas

Dialysis is the most consolidated category in CMS Care Compare. 91.5% of Kansas facilities are chain-owned; here are the largest chains by facility count in this state.

DaVita
34
Fresenius Medical Care
20
Independent
5

Dialysis facilities — Kansas

Showing 25 of 59 Medicare-certified facilities, highest CMS 5-star rating first (54 carry a published rating; the remainder are suppressed for low patient volume and shown without a star).

FacilityCityChainRating (of 5)
Renal care group - dodge cityDODGE CITYFresenius Medical Care5
Davita parsons dialysis centerParsonsDaVita5
Fmc - garden cityGARDEN CITYFresenius Medical Care5
Fkc - lenexaLENEXAFresenius Medical Care5
Fmc - wichitaWichitaFresenius Medical Care4
Davita ottawa dialysisOTTAWADaVita4
Renal care group - liberalLIBERALFresenius Medical Care4
Flint hills dialysis llcManhattanIndependent4
Davita renal treatment center-newtonNewtonDaVita4
Renal care group - newtonNewtonFresenius Medical Care4
Davita wyandotte west dialysisKANSAS CITYDaVita4
Renal care group - wichita westWICHITAFresenius Medical Care4
Davita olathe dialysisOLATHEDaVita4
Davita ne wichita dialysis centerWICHITADaVita4
Fresenius medical care- wichita eastWICHITAFresenius Medical Care4
Davita maize dialysis centerMAIZEDaVita4
Fresenius medical care derbyDERBYFresenius Medical Care4
Davita nall dialysisOverland ParkDaVita4
Davita andover dialysisANDOVERDaVita4
Davita emporia at home dialysisEMPORIADaVita4
Davita nottingham dialysisOLATHEDaVita4
Davita overland park dialysisOVERLAND PARKDaVita4
Davita walnut river dialysisEl DoradoDaVita4
Davita johnson county dialysisLENEXADaVita3
Fmc - salinaSalinaFresenius Medical Care3

Compliance posture

Methodology · Corrections log · Editorial policy

What’s on file, by the numbers

Platform snapshot · 2026-07-15

13.4Mproviders & companiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities on file
26.2Msource-linked factsSource-linked field facts in the dated platform snapshot
—sources liveCrosswalk-resolved sources with a proved content transition in the preceding 45 days
111sources integratedActive registry rows; integration does not establish a load
13state Medicaid jurisdictionsDistinct states represented in the state-exclusions serving table

Built on the authoritative federal record

The primary sources, named on every page.

These are the federal agencies whose public datasets Fonteum ingests and attributes — the issuing authorities, not customers or partners. Every figure on the site links back to one of them.

  • CMS
  • HHS-OIG
  • HRSA
  • FDA
  • NLM
  • NUCC
  • Census
  • BLS
  • BEA

See the full source registry, with license and refresh cadence for each →

Reproducible by design

Published figures name their source and date.

Source and date

Published research identifies its government file and observation date. Source-file SHA-256 coverage is disclosed separately; facts do not currently link deterministically to signatures.

Reproducible SQL

Each study ships the exact query behind its figures, run against the same dated copy of the federal file we used. Re-run it yourself.

Daily observations

The platform records table row counts daily. Those observations detect local drift; they do not imply that an upstream publisher released or Fonteum ingested new data that day.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Fonteum
Platform
Platform overviewAPIFor AI agents (MCP)FHIR R4 APIBulk exportAudit packReconciliationAI answers with sourcesHow records link upHistory
Solutions
All solutionsExclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & enrichmentAudit evidenceProvider data for AI / RAGUse casesM&A & network diligenceCompliance & riskJournalists & newsroomsDevelopers & AI teams
Data & sources
Coverage & sourcesBrowse all datasetsState Medicaid exclusionsFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareNursing homesRecall recordsSanctions screeningOIG LEIE listOwnershipStaffingDeficienciesSpecial Focus Facilities
Federal contracting
OverviewAwards during active exclusionFederal debarment scorecardProcurement questionsContractor lookup8(a) certification guide
Developers
Developer hubDocsAPI referenceQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrationsWebhooks
Research & guides
Research hubLearnHow it worksGuidesHealthcare provider dataExclusion & sanctions screeningProvider credentialing dataHealthcare data for AIHospital margin gapProvider access gapsGlossaryComparisonsSourced data vs plain LLM answersCitationsManifestoWhy Fonteum
Company
AboutPressCustomersPricingContactEditorial policyCorrections
Trust & legal
TrustTrust markQualitySecurityPrivacy policyTerms of serviceAPI termsMedical disclaimer

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

© 2026 Fonteum LLC. All rights reserved.

·hello@fonteum.com

A public-records graph that exposes source and observation metadata where supplied.

Fonteum's provenance ledger contained 26.2M source-linked facts on July 12, 2026. All but 14 carried a source-file SHA-256; 0 linked deterministically to a signature. Inspect a supplied snapshot id at fonteum.com/verify · source-mark coverage and limitations.
Request access→