Skip to content
FonteumPublic-records evidence
Fonteum · Tools

MIPS Score Lookup by Physician

Search CMS Quality Payment Program MIPS scores by physician name, NPI, or specialty in the loaded CMS QPP PY2023 dataset. Free, no signup.

477,137 clinician-score rows·CMS QPP PY2023·Annual source release

What this tool covers

Clinician-score rows
477,137
PY2023 individual records
Source
CMS QPP
qpp.cms.gov — federal public domain
Update cadence
Annual
CMS QPP source cadence
Methodology
cms-qpp/v1
Documented field mapping

The CMS Quality Payment Program publishes individual clinician MIPS scores annually. Each record includes the final composite score (0–100), component scores for Quality, Cost, Improvement Activities, and Promoting Interoperability when those values are present, plus participation type. The loaded PY2023 rows identify their performance year and CMS QPP dataset; they do not carry a per-row source-snapshot link or payment-adjustment percentage.

PY2023 payment threshold

Above threshold
> 75
At threshold
75
Below threshold
< 75

CMS maps PY2023 final scores above 75 to a positive adjustment, exactly 75 to neutral, and below 75 to negative. The loaded table does not include each clinician's payment-adjustment percentage.

Frequently asked questions

What is a MIPS score?
MIPS stands for Merit-based Incentive Payment System, part of the CMS Quality Payment Program (QPP). Eligible clinicians receive a composite score from 0 to 100 based on four performance categories: Quality (30%), Cost (30%), Improvement Activities (15%), and Promoting Interoperability (25%). The score determines a Medicare payment adjustment applied two years later — higher scores earn positive adjustments; lower scores receive negative adjustments.
How do I look up a physician's MIPS score by name?
Enter the physician's first or last name in the Physician Name tab. Fonteum searches the CMS NPPES registry to find matching providers and overlays their MIPS scores from the CMS Quality Payment Program PY2023 dataset. For an exact match, use the NPI tab with the provider's 10-digit National Provider Identifier. For specialty-wide searches, use the Specialty tab and enter a specialty description such as 'Internal Medicine' or 'Family Practice'.
What does the PY2023 MIPS performance threshold mean?
For PY2023, CMS used 75 points as the performance threshold. A score above 75 maps to a positive payment adjustment, exactly 75 maps to a neutral adjustment, and below 75 maps to a negative adjustment. The additional exceptional-performance bonus ended after PY2022.
Why might a physician have no MIPS score?
Not all clinicians participate in MIPS. A physician may not have a MIPS score because: (1) they are not a MIPS-eligible clinician type; (2) they qualified for an exception — small practice, extreme hardship, low-volume threshold; (3) they participate in an Advanced Alternative Payment Model (AAPM) instead of MIPS; or (4) they opted out of Medicare entirely. Fonteum shows the most recent performance year data available in the CMS QPP dataset.

Source & limitations

Data source: CMS Quality Payment Program (QPP) — MIPS Individual Clinician Performance Data, published annually by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services at qpp.cms.gov. Federal public domain (US-Government-Works). Provider name and specialty sourced from the CMS NPPES public registry in real-time.

Limitations: MIPS scores reflect individual clinician performance for PY2023 only. Not all eligible clinicians are included — those with low Medicare volume, small-practice exceptions, or extreme hardship exceptions may be absent. Group practice scores are tracked separately and not shown here. Do not use for credentialing, contracting, or regulatory decisions without verifying at the official CMS QPP portal.

Free to cite with attribution to Fonteum Research and a link to this tool.

Methodology · Sources · Corrections log · Editorial policy

What’s on file, by the numbers

Platform snapshot · 2026-08-12

13.4Mproviders & companiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities on file
26.2Msource-linked factsSource-linked field facts in the dated platform snapshot
90sources with dataDistinct snapshot source IDs with at least one positive record count
73fresh sourcesDistinct source IDs whose latest positive-data snapshot falls within the preceding 45 days
111sources integratedActive registry rows; integration does not establish a load
13state Medicaid jurisdictionsDistinct states represented in the state-exclusions serving table

Integrated, with-data, and fresh-observation counts are separate. No platform-wide source-completeness count is published. Completeness is source-specific and must be evaluated against the named source's expected scope. State coverage is a separate jurisdiction measure.

Source authority is record-specific

Use the issuer named on the record.

Fonteum spans federal, state, and global public publishers. A source page or returned record identifies its issuer and dataset where that metadata is available. A platform registry count does not assign every page to one authority or establish loaded, fresh, or complete coverage.

Browse source records and their stated limitations →

Reproducible by design

Inspect the evidence each published figure actually supplies.

Source and date

Research pages expose the named public file and observation date where those fields are available. Source-file SHA-256 coverage is separate; facts do not currently link deterministically to signatures.

Available derivation

Studies with a retained release and committed derivation link the SQL or method used. Other studies state the evidence and reproduction limits they actually have.

Daily observations

Dated table row-count observations can detect local drift. They do not imply that an upstream publisher released or Fonteum ingested new data that day.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Request access