Skip to content
FonteumThe Graph

By use case

Exclusion & monitoring (self-serve)Free roster screen — no accountExclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & provider-data enrichmentAudit evidence & defensible programsProvider data for AI / RAGM&A & network diligence

By buyer

Compliance & riskJournalists & newsroomsDevelopers & AI teams

By industry

HealthcareProviders & facilitiesSanctionsOFAC / EU / UK / UN / OIG / SAMFederal contractingSAM · USASpending · FAPIIS

The capability layer

APIREST + bulk accessFor AI agentsModel Context Protocol serverFHIR R4 APIBulk exportAudit packSigned report artifacts; source facts remain separately citedReconciliationSource-vs-source diffsAI answers with sourcesHow records link upHistoryRetained versions for named sources

The differentiator

Coverage & sourcesThe catalogFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareFacility qualityAI answers, comparedBrowse all datasets →
Research

The dev on-ramp

DocsAPI referenceConnect your AI agent (MCP)One-paste installFHIR sandboxLive API surfaceQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrations
Pricing
Sign inFree roster screen →Get a signed certificate →

Solutions

Exclusion & monitoring (self-serve)Exclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & provider-data enrichmentAudit evidence & defensible programsProvider data for AI / RAGM&A & network diligenceCompliance & riskJournalists & newsroomsDevelopers & AI teamsHealthcareSanctionsFederal contracting

Platform

APIFor AI agentsFHIR R4 APIBulk exportAudit packReconciliationAI answers with sourcesHow records link upHistory

Data

Coverage & sourcesFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareAI answers, comparedBrowse all datasets →
Research

Developers

DocsAPI referenceConnect your AI agent (MCP)FHIR sandboxQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrations
Pricing
Sign inFree roster screen →Get a signed certificate →
Fonteum · Tools

MIPS Score Lookup by Physician

Search CMS Quality Payment Program MIPS scores by physician name, NPI, or specialty. Source-provenanced to the CMS QPP PY2023 federal dataset. Free, no signup.

540K+ clinicians·CMS QPP PY2023·Updated quarterly

What this tool covers

Clinicians covered
540K+
PY2023 individual participants
Source
CMS QPP
qpp.cms.gov — federal public domain
Update cadence
Quarterly
Annual QPP release, quarterly ingest
Methodology
cms-qpp/v1
Pinned, audit-traceable

The CMS Quality Payment Program publishes individual clinician MIPS scores annually. Each record includes the final composite score (0–100), component scores for Quality, Cost, Improvement Activities, and Promoting Interoperability, and the resulting Medicare payment adjustment percentage. Fonteum adds field-level provenance — source identifier, performance year, ingest timestamp — so every record is traceable to its CMS origin.

Score bands

Exceptional
75–100
Above Average
60–74.99
Met Threshold
45–59.99
Below Threshold
0–44.99

Thresholds reflect CMS QPP PY2023 performance category structure.

Frequently asked questions

What is a MIPS score?
MIPS stands for Merit-based Incentive Payment System, part of the CMS Quality Payment Program (QPP). Eligible clinicians receive a composite score from 0 to 100 based on four performance categories: Quality (30%), Cost (30%), Improvement Activities (15%), and Promoting Interoperability (25%). The score determines a Medicare payment adjustment applied two years later — higher scores earn positive adjustments; lower scores receive negative adjustments.
How do I look up a physician's MIPS score by name?
Enter the physician's first or last name in the Physician Name tab. Fonteum searches the CMS NPPES registry to find matching providers and overlays their MIPS scores from the CMS Quality Payment Program PY2023 dataset. For an exact match, use the NPI tab with the provider's 10-digit National Provider Identifier. For specialty-wide searches, use the Specialty tab and enter a specialty description such as 'Internal Medicine' or 'Family Practice'.
What do the MIPS score bands mean — Exceptional, Above Average, Met Threshold, Below Threshold?
Fonteum classifies MIPS final scores into four bands based on CMS QPP performance thresholds. Exceptional (75+): clinician performance significantly above the national average, typically qualifies for exceptional performance bonus payments. Above Average (60–74.99): above the performance threshold with a positive payment adjustment. Met Threshold (45–59.99): meets the minimum performance threshold with a minimal positive adjustment. Below Threshold (below 45): performance below the minimum threshold; subject to a negative payment adjustment.
Why might a physician have no MIPS score?
Not all clinicians participate in MIPS. A physician may not have a MIPS score because: (1) they are not a MIPS-eligible clinician type; (2) they qualified for an exception — small practice, extreme hardship, low-volume threshold; (3) they participate in an Advanced Alternative Payment Model (AAPM) instead of MIPS; or (4) they opted out of Medicare entirely. Fonteum shows the most recent performance year data available in the CMS QPP dataset.

Source & limitations

Data source: CMS Quality Payment Program (QPP) — MIPS Individual Clinician Performance Data, published annually by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services at qpp.cms.gov. Federal public domain (US-Government-Works). Provider name and specialty sourced from the CMS NPPES public registry in real-time.

Limitations: MIPS scores reflect individual clinician performance for PY2023 only. Not all eligible clinicians are included — those with low Medicare volume, small-practice exceptions, or extreme hardship exceptions may be absent. Group practice scores are tracked separately and not shown here. Do not use for credentialing, contracting, or regulatory decisions without verifying at the official CMS QPP portal.

Free to cite with attribution to Fonteum Research and a link to this tool.

NPI Provider Lookup → · All free tools →

Compliance posture

Methodology · Corrections log · Editorial policy

What’s on file, by the numbers

Platform snapshot · 2026-07-15

13.4Mproviders & companiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities on file
26.2Msource-linked factsSource-linked field facts in the dated platform snapshot
—sources liveCrosswalk-resolved sources with a proved content transition in the preceding 45 days
111sources integratedActive registry rows; integration does not establish a load
13state Medicaid jurisdictionsDistinct states represented in the state-exclusions serving table

Built on the authoritative federal record

The primary sources, named on every page.

These are the federal agencies whose public datasets Fonteum ingests and attributes — the issuing authorities, not customers or partners. Every figure on the site links back to one of them.

  • CMS
  • HHS-OIG
  • HRSA
  • FDA
  • NLM
  • NUCC
  • Census
  • BLS
  • BEA

See the full source registry, with license and refresh cadence for each →

Reproducible by design

Published figures name their source and date.

Source and date

Published research identifies its government file and observation date. Source-file SHA-256 coverage is disclosed separately; facts do not currently link deterministically to signatures.

Reproducible SQL

Each study ships the exact query behind its figures, run against the same dated copy of the federal file we used. Re-run it yourself.

Daily observations

The platform records table row counts daily. Those observations detect local drift; they do not imply that an upstream publisher released or Fonteum ingested new data that day.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Fonteum
Platform
Platform overviewAPIFor AI agents (MCP)FHIR R4 APIBulk exportAudit packReconciliationAI answers with sourcesHow records link upHistory
Solutions
All solutionsExclusion & sanctions screeningCredentialing & enrichmentAudit evidenceProvider data for AI / RAGUse casesM&A & network diligenceCompliance & riskJournalists & newsroomsDevelopers & AI teams
Data & sources
Coverage & sourcesBrowse all datasetsState Medicaid exclusionsFreshnessMethodologyCare CompareNursing homesRecall recordsSanctions screeningOIG LEIE listOwnershipStaffingDeficienciesSpecial Focus Facilities
Federal contracting
OverviewAwards during active exclusionFederal debarment scorecardProcurement questionsContractor lookup8(a) certification guide
Developers
Developer hubDocsAPI referenceQuickstartStatusChangelogSDKs & integrationsWebhooks
Research & guides
Research hubLearnHow it worksGuidesHealthcare provider dataExclusion & sanctions screeningProvider credentialing dataHealthcare data for AIHospital margin gapProvider access gapsGlossaryComparisonsSourced data vs plain LLM answersCitationsManifestoWhy Fonteum
Company
AboutPressCustomersPricingContactEditorial policyCorrections
Trust & legal
TrustTrust markQualitySecurityPrivacy policyTerms of serviceAPI termsMedical disclaimer

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

© 2026 Fonteum LLC. All rights reserved.

·hello@fonteum.com

A public-records graph that exposes source and observation metadata where supplied.

Fonteum's provenance ledger contained 26.2M source-linked facts on July 12, 2026. All but 14 carried a source-file SHA-256; 0 linked deterministically to a signature. Inspect a supplied snapshot id at fonteum.com/verify · source-mark coverage and limitations.
Request access→