Skip to content
FonteumPublic-records evidence
PROVIDER ACCESS GAP · STATE

urologists per 100,000 in Kansas

4.21 active urologists per 100,000 residents — ranked 31 of 51 U.S. states + DC.

urologists per 100,000 residents
4.21
125 active urologists · 2,970,606 residents · Kansas

National rank
31 / 51
Percentile
41th
below national median
Underserved threshold
2.5 / 100k
above
Quartile
Q3

Comparable areas

Three states whose urologist per-100k density is closest to Kansas's — useful for benchmarking.

Citeable result

Plain-text citation block — paste verbatim into a brief, story, or report.

Kansas has 125 active urologists (4.21 per 100,000 residents) — ranked 31 of 51 U.S. states + DC. Source: CMS NPPES NPI Registry + U.S. Census Bureau, snapshot 2026-05-06. Threshold for "underserved" in the parent study: 2.5 per 100,000. Citation: Fonteum Research, /research/urologist-supply-by-state-2026.

Source provenance

  • U.S. Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services NPI Registry (NPPES) — public API
  • U.S. Census Bureau Population Estimates Program, 2024 Vintage (V2024)
  • Snapshot date: 2026-05-06

Limitations

  • This figure measures density (per-capita supply), not access. Drive time, appointment availability, insurance acceptance, and wait times are not modeled here.
  • The CMS NPPES registry counts NPI-1 individual providers with the relevant taxonomy code. It does not capture PA-led or NP-led practices that operate under a different taxonomy.
  • NPPES does not publish a county-level field of practice in its public API. County- and ZIP-scoped queries surface state-level density, with the geographic context preserved on this page.
  • Population is the U.S. Census Bureau 2024 vintage estimate. Population shifts post-2024 are not yet reflected.
  • The "underserved" threshold is the parent study's transparent baseline cutoff; it is not a regulatory or clinical definition. See the parent study for the rationale.

What’s on file, by the numbers

Platform snapshot · 2026-08-14

13.4Mproviders & companiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities on file
26.2Msource-linked factsSource-linked field facts in the dated platform snapshot
90sources with dataDistinct snapshot source IDs with at least one positive record count
72fresh sourcesDistinct source IDs whose latest positive-data snapshot falls within the preceding 45 days
111sources integratedActive registry rows; integration does not establish a load
13state Medicaid jurisdictionsDistinct states represented in the state-exclusions serving table

Integrated, with-data, and fresh-observation counts are separate. No platform-wide source-completeness count is published. Completeness is source-specific and must be evaluated against the named source's expected scope. State coverage is a separate jurisdiction measure.

Source authority is record-specific

Use the issuer named on the record.

Fonteum spans federal, state, and global public publishers. A source page or returned record identifies its issuer and dataset where that metadata is available. A platform registry count does not assign every page to one authority or establish loaded, fresh, or complete coverage.

Browse source records and their stated limitations →

Reproducible by design

Inspect the evidence each published figure actually supplies.

Source and date

Research pages expose the named public file and observation date where those fields are available. Source-file SHA-256 coverage is separate; facts do not currently link deterministically to signatures.

Available derivation

Studies with a retained release and committed derivation link the SQL or method used. Other studies state the evidence and reproduction limits they actually have.

Daily observations

Dated table row-count observations can detect local drift. They do not imply that an upstream publisher released or Fonteum ingested new data that day.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Request access