Skip to content

Role profile

Editorial Lead

Fonteum Research

About

Listed as a role rather than a person — see the body for the current responsibility split.

The Editorial Lead reviews every published figure for tone, sourcing rigour, and YMYL safety before a study ships. The role owns the editorial policy as a living document and is the named arbiter for any reader-flagged correction.

This role is currently fulfilled by the founder. We list it as a separate role here so the responsibilities are explicit and so the masthead is shaped for the dedicated hire when one closes. When a named Editorial Lead is appointed, this profile is replaced with their named profile in the same shape.

Reach the Editorial Lead via the corrections form. Substantive editorial inquiries route to press@fonteum.com.

Responsibilities

Pre-publish review of every research study
Owner of the published editorial policy
Named arbiter on reader-flagged corrections
Tone and YMYL-safety review on user-facing copy

← Back to the masthead

What’s on file, by the numbers

Platform snapshot · 2026-08-11

13.4Mproviders & companiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities on file

26.2Msource-linked factsSource-linked field facts in the dated platform snapshot

90sources with dataDistinct snapshot source IDs with at least one positive record count

73fresh sourcesDistinct source IDs whose latest positive-data snapshot falls within the preceding 45 days

111sources integratedActive registry rows; integration does not establish a load

13state Medicaid jurisdictionsDistinct states represented in the state-exclusions serving table

Integrated, with-data, and fresh-observation counts are separate. No platform-wide source-completeness count is published. Completeness is source-specific and must be evaluated against the named source's expected scope. State coverage is a separate jurisdiction measure.

Source authority is record-specific

Use the issuer named on the record.

Fonteum spans federal, state, and global public publishers. A source page or returned record identifies its issuer and dataset where that metadata is available. A platform registry count does not assign every page to one authority or establish loaded, fresh, or complete coverage.

Browse source records and their stated limitations →

Reproducible by design

Inspect the evidence each published figure actually supplies.

Source and date

Research pages expose the named public file and observation date where those fields are available. Source-file SHA-256 coverage is separate; facts do not currently link deterministically to signatures.

Available derivation

Studies with a retained release and committed derivation link the SQL or method used. Other studies state the evidence and reproduction limits they actually have.

Daily observations

Dated table row-count observations can detect local drift. They do not imply that an upstream publisher released or Fonteum ingested new data that day.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →