Skip to content
FonteumPublic-records evidence
Free screen

Screen an identifier against the currently loaded exclusion sources.

Paste a healthcare roster or a federal contractor and check it against the OIG LEIE, SAM.gov debarments, and supported state Medicaid exclusion lists in one pass. The loaded states are GA, IA, MD, MS, MT, NC, ND, NH, NY, OH, PA, TN, and WA; the other states are not covered. For healthcare NPIs, the screen also reports OIG Corporate Integrity Agreements and CMS civil-money-penalty records, when an NPI-linked record is available. The free result shows counts and the matched-source breakdown on screen only. Don't trust us — re-check every consequential match at the primary source.

Up to 25 unique ten-digit NPI inputs are screened.

Public NPIs only. No PHI. No free artifact, email, or monitoring enrollment. Do not submit a confidential roster or affiliation list. This public GET URL can appear in browser history, logs, analytics, shared links, and referrers.
How it works
  1. 01
    Paste your identifiers

    Up to 25 unique ten-digit provider NPIs for healthcare, or 10 contractor UEIs for procurement. Public registry keys only — no PHI, no roster upload kept.

  2. 02
    Run the on-demand screen

    The supported registries are checked and the free workflow returns aggregate counts plus a matched-source breakdown on screen.

  3. 03
    Read the coverage limit

    The free workflow creates no download, email, or monitoring enrollment. Stale or incomplete coverage returns indeterminate rather than a negative determination.

Screening aid, not a certification. Re-confirm every match at the primary source before any adverse action. A no-match result is issued only under reconciled current coverage; stale or incomplete coverage returns indeterminate and is not a clearance.

See also

Fonteum presents public-record information with source, date, and limitation context. Sources can change after capture. This service is not a consumer reporting agency and is not for employment, housing, credit, insurance, or other FCRA-regulated eligibility decisions.

What’s on file, by the numbers

Platform snapshot · 2026-08-26

13.4Mproviders & companiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities on file
26.2Msource-linked factsSource-linked field facts in the dated platform snapshot
90sources with dataDistinct snapshot source IDs with at least one positive record count
70fresh sourcesDistinct source IDs whose latest positive-data snapshot falls within the preceding 45 days
111sources integratedActive registry rows; integration does not establish a load
13state Medicaid jurisdictionsDistinct states represented in the state-exclusions serving table

Integrated, with-data, and fresh-observation counts are separate. No platform-wide source-completeness count is published. Completeness is source-specific and must be evaluated against the named source's expected scope. State coverage is a separate jurisdiction measure.

Source authority is record-specific

Use the issuer named on the record.

Fonteum spans federal, state, and global public publishers. A source page or returned record identifies its issuer and dataset where that metadata is available. A platform registry count does not assign every page to one authority or establish loaded, fresh, or complete coverage.

Browse source records and their stated limitations →

Reproducible by design

Inspect the evidence each published figure actually supplies.

Source and date

Research pages expose the named public file and observation date where those fields are available. Source-file SHA-256 coverage is separate; facts do not currently link deterministically to signatures.

Available derivation

Studies with a retained release and committed derivation link the SQL or method used. Other studies state the evidence and reproduction limits they actually have.

Daily observations

Dated table row-count observations can detect local drift. They do not imply that an upstream publisher released or Fonteum ingested new data that day.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Request access