Skip to content
FonteumPublic-records evidence

METHODOLOGY · v2026.05.0

Dialysis Facility Quality by State (CMS Care Compare)

State-level rollups of CMS Care Compare dialysis-facility ratings.

Version v2026.05.0Snapshot date April 1, 2026Publisher cadence Quarterly (matches CMS Care Compare release cadence).

What this methodology is

This page is the public, versioned methodology for the Dialysis Facility Quality by State (CMS Care Compare) dataset. It documents how the figures defined by the matched Fonteum Research study, /api/v1 endpoint, and Audit Pack were constructed — from registered public-source ingest through aggregation rules to the rendered output. It exists so buyers can satisfy auditor questions by linking to a single durable URL.

The sections below define Fonteum's transformation rules. Where the methodology differs from the underlying source's own description (for example: which taxonomies count, how Type-1 vs Type-2 NPIs are treated, how density per 100k is computed), the rule lives here, not in the source. Methodology versions (v2026.05.0 today) increment when those rules change; recorded snapshot observations are listed separately from publisher cadence and appear only where this manifest includes them.

Source provenance

Source families
CMS Care Compare datasets (public)
Spatial resolution
Facility (point) + state rollups.
Temporal coverage
CMS quarterly Care Compare release (current snapshot 2026-04-01).
Publisher cadence
Quarterly (matches CMS Care Compare release cadence).
Snapshot scope
7,700 facilities across 51 states + DC; snapshot dated April 1, 2026.

The Fonteum sources registry holds the canonical entry for each source family — Tier classification, ToS posture, publisher cadence, and catalog status. Publisher cadence is not a loaded-date guarantee: /sources.

Reproducibility statement

An independent researcher with access only to the public sources listed above can recreate this dataset by following these steps. Discrepancies between an independent reproduction and the published figures belong in /corrections-log; we publish them when they arise.

1. Pull the CMS Care Compare Dialysis Facility dataset from data.cms.gov/provider-data/dataset/23ew-n7w9. 2. Bucket by state. 3. Compute per-state count + rating distribution. 4. Publish state rollups with methodology link to the original CMS dataset.

Limitations

Limitations are surfaced explicitly, not buried. Each item below is a constraint a buyer’s compliance team should review before relying on the dataset for a specific use case.

  • Each CMS measure carries its own published limitations; readers should review the CMS dataset documentation linked in the methodology for measure-specific caveats. We do not modify CMS's published measure values, only re-aggregate to state-level rollups.
  • Sampling-based measures (e.g. patient-experience surveys) carry confidence bands CMS publishes alongside the values. State-level rollups average across facilities and do not preserve those bands; for facility-specific decisions, reference the original CMS Care Compare record.
  • Date alignment: state rollups are computed from the CMS file's published reporting period, not the file release date. The reporting period typically lags the release date by 6-12 months per CMS convention.

Field schema

This manifest lists the documented fields for this dataset with source, publisher-cadence, and confidence definitions. Runtime responses can return a subset, and record-level provenance fields may be null or absent.

FieldDescriptionSourcePublisher cadenceConfidence
facility_ccnCMS Certification Number for the dialysis facility.CMS Care Compare — Dialysis Compare Quarterly1.0 (verbatim)
stateFacility state (USPS code).CMS Care Compare — Dialysis Compare Quarterly1.0 (verbatim)
ratingCMS dialysis-facility rating where published.CMS Care Compare — Dialysis Compare Quarterly1.0 (verbatim)

Version history

The methodology versions recorded in this manifest appear here with their change rationale. A listed data-only snapshot observation can appear as a same-version entry; the table is not a universal history or replay service.

VersionReleasedWhat changed
v2026.05.0currentMay 6, 2026Initial Audit Pack release. Methodology, provenance map, reproducibility statement, and limitations stack baselined.

Cite this methodology

For procurement attachments, audit responses, footer attribution, or academic use. Pick a format and copy.

Fonteum. (2026). Dialysis Facility Quality by State (CMS Care Compare) (v2026.05.0) [Dataset]. Fonteum LLC. https://fonteum.com/methodology/dialysis-quality

Methodology questions: methodology@fonteum.com. Data corrections: /corrections-log. B2B inquiries: api@fonteum.com.

This page is the durable URL a buyer’s compliance officer can link from their product. The version pinned at the URL (v2026.05.0) is the active methodology. The Version history table is a changelog, not a promise that each historical dataset snapshot remains queryable.

What’s on file, by the numbers

Platform snapshot · 2026-08-08

13.4Mproviders & companiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities on file
26.2Msource-linked factsSource-linked field facts in the dated platform snapshot
90sources with dataDistinct snapshot source IDs with at least one positive record count
74fresh sourcesDistinct source IDs whose latest positive-data snapshot falls within the preceding 45 days
111sources integratedActive registry rows; integration does not establish a load
13state Medicaid jurisdictionsDistinct states represented in the state-exclusions serving table

Integrated, with-data, and fresh-observation counts are separate. No platform-wide source-completeness count is published. Completeness is source-specific and must be evaluated against the named source's expected scope. State coverage is a separate jurisdiction measure.

Source authority is record-specific

Use the issuer named on the record.

Fonteum spans federal, state, and global public publishers. A source page or returned record identifies its issuer and dataset where that metadata is available. A platform registry count does not assign every page to one authority or establish loaded, fresh, or complete coverage.

Browse source records and their stated limitations →

Reproducible by design

Inspect the evidence each published figure actually supplies.

Source and date

Research pages expose the named public file and observation date where those fields are available. Source-file SHA-256 coverage is separate; facts do not currently link deterministically to signatures.

Available derivation

Studies with a retained release and committed derivation link the SQL or method used. Other studies state the evidence and reproduction limits they actually have.

Daily observations

Dated table row-count observations can detect local drift. They do not imply that an upstream publisher released or Fonteum ingested new data that day.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Request access