Skip to content
FonteumPublic-records evidence
Federal Contracting · Fonteum Data GlossaryRegulatory

What is FAPIIS?

Full name: Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System

The Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System (FAPIIS) is a federal database that records contractor integrity and performance information used in responsibility determinations. It captures terminations for cause or default, defective-pricing findings, non-responsibility determinations, and certain proceedings, giving a contracting officer a record of an entity's past conduct before a new award is made.

Source file
Not reported
Published
Not reported
Retrieved
Not reported
Snapshot
Not retained for this reference page
Data as of
Not reported
Last updated: 2026-07-11Reviewed by: Fonteum data standards deskSource-provenance editorial review. Definitions checked against primary federal sources.

How it’s used

  • Responsibility determinations: contracting officers review FAPIIS before award to judge whether an entity is a responsible source under FAR Part 9.
  • SAM.gov integration: FAPIIS records are reached through SAM.gov and keyed to the entity's Unique Entity Identifier.
  • Fonteum resolves FAPIIS-style integrity signals to the same entity identity it builds from SAM.gov exclusions and registration, so an entity's record reads in one place.

Frequently asked questions

What is FAPIIS?
FAPIIS (Federal Awardee Performance and Integrity Information System) is a federal database of contractor integrity and performance records that contracting officers consult before making an award.
What information is in FAPIIS?
FAPIIS records include terminations for cause or default, defective-pricing determinations, non-responsibility determinations, and certain civil, criminal, or administrative proceedings.
Who can see FAPIIS data?
Some FAPIIS information is public through SAM.gov, while other records are restricted to federal officials making responsibility determinations.

Explore in Fonteum

How Fonteum sources, resolves, and publishes data tied to this term.

What’s on file, by the numbers

Platform snapshot · 2026-08-23

13.4Mproviders & companiesProviders, organizations, owners, and facilities on file
26.2Msource-linked factsSource-linked field facts in the dated platform snapshot
90sources with dataDistinct snapshot source IDs with at least one positive record count
70fresh sourcesDistinct source IDs whose latest positive-data snapshot falls within the preceding 45 days
111sources integratedActive registry rows; integration does not establish a load
13state Medicaid jurisdictionsDistinct states represented in the state-exclusions serving table

Integrated, with-data, and fresh-observation counts are separate. No platform-wide source-completeness count is published. Completeness is source-specific and must be evaluated against the named source's expected scope. State coverage is a separate jurisdiction measure.

Source authority is record-specific

Use the issuer named on the record.

Fonteum spans federal, state, and global public publishers. A source page or returned record identifies its issuer and dataset where that metadata is available. A platform registry count does not assign every page to one authority or establish loaded, fresh, or complete coverage.

Browse source records and their stated limitations →

Reproducible by design

Inspect the evidence each published figure actually supplies.

Source and date

Research pages expose the named public file and observation date where those fields are available. Source-file SHA-256 coverage is separate; facts do not currently link deterministically to signatures.

Available derivation

Studies with a retained release and committed derivation link the SQL or method used. Other studies state the evidence and reproduction limits they actually have.

Daily observations

Dated table row-count observations can detect local drift. They do not imply that an upstream publisher released or Fonteum ingested new data that day.

Named medical review

Reviewed by Jennifer Montecillo, MD, medical reviewer. Non-practicing medical reviewer.

Read the full provenance and attestation methodology →

Request access